Eriona Canga

Dr. Eriona Canga


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

16Years (2011-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 September 2011 in Water Science & Technology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
ECEriona Canga
Eriona Canga
SSSara Dal Santo
Sara Dal Santo
APAlexander Pressl
Alexander Pressl
Maurizio BorinMaurizio Borin
Maurizio Borin
Guenter LangergraberGuenter Langergraber
Guenter Langergraber
In this paper the nitrogen elimination rates of different constructed wetland (CW) designs reported in literature are compared with those obtained for outdoor and indoor 2-stage vertical flow (VF) systems. The outdoor system is located about 150 km west of Vienna. Both stages are planted with Phragmites australis and the system has been operated for 4 years continuously. During this period the average value of the nitrogen elimination rate was 3.30 g N m−2 d−1. The indoor system comprises three parallel operated 2-stage VF systems and is located in the technical lab hall at BOKU University. The design of the indoor system resembles the outdoor system. However, there are a few differences: (1) the indoor systems are not planted, and (2) different filter media have been used for the main layer of the first stages. With the indoor system the highest nitrogen elimination rate achieved was 2.24 g N m−2 d−1 for the system with zeolite and impounded drainage layer. Similar results have been found in France for treating raw wastewater with VF and horizontal flow (HF) beds in series with nitrogen elimination rates of 1.89 and 2.82 g N m−2 d−1 for differently designed HF beds. The highest nitrogen elimination rates of 15.9 g N m−2 d−1 reported were for pilot-scale VF CWs treating high-strength synthetic wastewater (total nitrogen of 305 mg L−1 in the influent) in Thailand. It has been shown that the outdoor two-stage VF CW system has one of the highest nitrogen elimination rates of CWs treating domestic wastewater.

21 July 2016 in Water, Air, & Soil Pollution
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
ECEriona Canga
Eriona Canga
GHGoswin Johann Heckrath
Goswin Johann Heckrath
CKCharlotte Kjaergaard
Charlotte Kjaergaard

30 October 2023 in Water Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
LPLorenzo Pugliese
Lorenzo Pugliese
ECEriona Canga
Eriona Canga
HHHans Chr. Bruun Hansen
Hans Chr. Bruun Hansen
CKCharlotte Kjærgaard
Charlotte Kjærgaard
GHGoswin J. Heckrath
Goswin J. Heckrath
TPTjalfe G. Poulsen
Tjalfe G. Poulsen
Phosphorus (P) losses from tile-drained agricultural fields may degrade surface water quality by accelerating eutrophication. Among the different edge-of-field technologies, compact filter systems using different filter materials have been identified as potentially effective solutions for removing P from drainage water before discharge downstream. This study investigated the long-term (>696 days) P removal efficiency of 5 different filter materials in a column setup, using artificial drainage water (pH 6). Filter materials included two iron-based granulates (calcinated diatomaceous earth (CDE), ferric hydroxide granules (CFH)), and three calcium-based granulates (seashells, limestone, calcinated silicate/calcium oxide (Filtralite-P)). Experiments were performed under variable flow rates (0.037 and 1.52 L h-1; hydraulic retention time of 26-43 min and 18-30 h) and inlet P concentrations (0.14 and 0.7 mg L-1). An overall analysis revealed that the Fe-based materials achieved higher P retention than Ca-based materials. In particular, CFH was capable of retaining 99 and 98 % of the high and low inlet P concentrations, respectively. Conversely, limestone retained only 25 % of the high P load. CDE performed moderately well, independently of the inlet P concentration. Filtralite-P and Seashells performed well at high inlet P concentration but relatively poorly at low P concentration. The sensitivity of filter material P removal efficiency to variations in P loading was generally lowest for CFH and highest for limestone.

29 November 2013 in Water, Air, & Soil Pollution
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
ECEriona Canga
Eriona Canga
Bo Vangsø IversenBo Vangsø Iversen
Bo Vangsø Iversen
CKCharlotte Kjaergaard
Charlotte Kjaergaard

29 July 2016 in Water, Air, & Soil Pollution
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
ECEriona Canga
Eriona Canga
CKCharlotte Kjaergaard
Charlotte Kjaergaard
BIBo V. Iversen
Bo V. Iversen
GHGoswin J. Heckrath
Goswin J. Heckrath

15 March 2013 in Water, Air, & Soil Pollution
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
RARune R. Andreasen
Rune R. Andreasen
ECEriona Canga
Eriona Canga
CKCharlotte Kjaergaard
Charlotte Kjaergaard
Bo Vangsø IversenBo Vangsø Iversen
Bo Vangsø Iversen
TPTjalfe G. Poulsen
Tjalfe G. Poulsen