The skin, the body's largest organ, acts as the primary defense against external environmental threats and is crucial for maintaining homeostasis. It encounters various challenges in healing diverse wound types, including mechanical injuries, diabetic ulcers, and burns. Zinc oxide nanoparticles (ZnO NPs) are increasingly recognized for their unique properties and potential in promoting skin wound healing. However, the effects and specific mechanisms of ZnO NPs in pathological microenvironments remain poorly understood. This systematic review aims to elucidate the roles of ZnO NPs in the wound healing processes associated with mechanical injuries, diabetic ulcers, and burns. Relevant literature was identified using defined search terms related to skin wounds treated by ZnO NPs. The findings across studies show that ZnO-loaded dressings exhibit superior efficacy in promoting tissue regeneration. At appropriate concentrations, ZnO NPs demonstrate superior performance compared to non-ZnO materials in promoting wound healing. Additionally, ZnO NP-containing materials possess characteristics such as antibacterial and anti-inflammatory properties. The mechanisms underlying the promotion of wound healing by ZnO in mechanical traumas, diabetic ulcers, and burns are summarized, highlighting its promising potential for tissue regeneration applications.

Zinc-based biodegradable metals (BMs) have been developed for biomedical implant materials. However, the cytotoxicity of Zn and its alloys has caused controversy. This work aims to investigate whether Zn and its alloys possess cytotoxic effects and the corresponding influence factors. According to the guidelines of the PRISMA statement, an electronic combined hand search was conducted to retrieve articles published in PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus (2013.1–2023.2) following the PICOS strategy. Eighty-six eligible articles were included. The quality of the included toxicity studies was assessed utilizing the ToxRTool. Among the included articles, extract tests were performed in 83 studies, and direct contact tests were conducted in 18 studies. According to the results of this review, the cytotoxicity of Zn-based BMs is mainly determined by three factors, namely, Zn-based materials, tested cells, and test system. Notably, Zn and its alloys did not exhibit cytotoxic effects under certain test conditions, but significant heterogeneity existed in the implementation of the cytotoxicity evaluation. Furthermore, there is currently a relatively lower quality of current cytotoxicity evaluation in Zn-based BMs owing to the adoption of nonuniform standards. Establishing a standardized in vitro toxicity assessment system for Zn-based BMs is required for future investigations.

Computer-aided design (CAD) and additive manufacturing (AM) have shown promise in facilitating the fabrication of custom trays. Due to the clinical requirements, custom tray materials should achieve good bonding to the impression/adhesive systems. This study evaluated the retention of three fused deposition modeling (FDM) custom tray materials to a silicone impression/adhesive system before and after gritblasting (GB) by peel-off test. CAD-designed experimental test blocks were printed by FDM using acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS), polyethylene terephthalate glycol copolyester (PETG), and high impact polystyrene (HIPS), and the reference test blocks were made of a conventional light-curing resin (n = 11). Before and after GB, the surface topography of all tray materials was analysed, and the maximum strength of the test block peeled off from a silicone impression/adhesive system was measured. After GB, the arithmetic mean height (Sa) and the valley fluid retention index (Svi) of the four material groups declined (p < 0.05). The peel-off strength of each of the four material groups significantly decreased by GB (p < 0.05), but no statistical difference could be found among them before or after GB. In all peel-off tests, adhesive failure occurred at the adhesive-impression material interface. The results indicated ABS, HIPS, and PETG could provide sufficient adhesion to the adhesive as the conventional light-curing resin, and GB could reduce the roughness generated by FDM and weaken the bonding between the adhesive and the silicone impression.