CD20-positive multiple myeloma complicated by cold agglutinin disease - Gulhane Medical Journal

Background/aim: A proliferation-inducing ligand (APRIL) has been investigated as a prognostic marker in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) patients. However, there is no cut-off level for serum APRIL (sAPRIL) levels that predict time to treatment in CLL patients. Materials and methods: Between May and December 2012, 94 consecutive CLL patients and 25 healthy controls were assessed. sAPRIL levels were measured by ELISA. Demographic data and prognostic markers were obtained from the patients' files. Treatment-naive patients were followed up for 6.5 years for any treatment need. Results: Patients were divided into 3 groups: Treatment-naive (n = 47), chemotherapy receiving (n = 25), and those who had received chemotherapy previously (n = 22). There was no difference in median sAPRIL levels of patients who were receiving chemotherapy at the sampling time and the healthy controls, which indicates that sAPRIL levels might be influenced by treatment. For treatment-naive patients, the best cut-off in predicting time to treatment was found at the sAPRIL level of 2.04 ng/mL, with 78% sensitivity and 63% specificity. Time to treatment was significantly earlier in the APRIL high group (n = 27) than in the APRIL low group (n = 20) (P = 0.010, log-rank test). Conclusion: sAPRIL, a simple, promising blood test which can be measured by ELISA, will likely obtain a place in the wide range of prognostic markers in CLL. Prospective large-scale studies are required to validate and confirm the feasibility of the proposed cut-off level of 2.04 ng/mL as a predictor of time to treatment in treatment-naive CLL patients.

Multiple myeloma (MM) is a hematological disease characterized by the increase of abnormal immunoglobulin. Clinical features of MM are anemia, recurrent bacterial infections, osteolytic bone lesions, and renal failure. Bortezomib is a frequently used agent in the treatment of disease. A male patient was admitted to our hematology department with dermal lesions. Physical findings revealed a gross hyperemic dermal area. The purpose of this case is to present the bortezomib associated rash and its treatment in a 71-year-old male patient treated with bortezomib. Although bortezomib is a frequently used agent in the treatment of MM, side effects may occur rarely. Therefore, during patient follow-up, drug side effects should be carefully evaluated.

Background/Objectives: Eltrombopag, a thrombopoietin receptor agonist, is widely used in the treatment of relapsed or refractory (R/R) immune thrombocytopenia (ITP). This study aimed to compare the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of generic eltrombopag (Rompag^®) with original eltrombopag (Revolade^®) in adult patients with R/R ITP. Methods: In this prospective, multicenter study conducted at 10 centers, 104 adult ITP patients were followed for at least 3 months. A total of 35 (33.7%) patients received Rompag^® and 69 (66.3%) received Revolade^®. The primary endpoint was platelet (PLT) response, defined as achieving a PLT count ≥50 × 10⁹/L and at least a twofold increase from baseline, without the need for rescue therapy or transfusion. Secondary endpoints included bleeding rates, fatigue-related quality of life, adverse events (AEs), and rescue therapy requirements. Results: PLT response was achieved in 94.2% of patients in the Revolade^® group and 85.7% in the Rompag^® group (p = 0.16). Bleeding rates decreased significantly in both groups (Revolade^®: 56.5% to 2.9%, p < 0.001; Rompag^®: 62.9% to 2.9%, p < 0.001). Although overall AE rates were similar (30.4% in the Revolade^® group and 42.9% in the Rompag^® group; p = 0.22), arthralgia (28.6% vs. 7.2%, p = 0.01) and vomiting (11.4% vs. 0%, p = 0.008) were more frequent with Rompag^®. Conclusions: Both generic and original eltrombopag demonstrated no statistically significant difference in efficacy in achieving PLT response, reducing bleeding, and improving fatigue-related quality of life in adult patients with R/R ITP. Although minor differences in AE profiles were observed, particularly arthralgia and vomiting, both formulations showed acceptable safety and tolerability.