The reliability and durability of reinforced concrete structures depend on the amount of concrete cracking. The risk associated with cracks generates a need for diagnostic methods for the evaluation of reinforced concrete structures. This paper presents the results of a study of 10 single-span reinforced concrete beams to follow the process of crack formation and changes in their width. The beams were loaded to failure with two forces in a monotonic manner with unloading and in a cyclic manner. Continuous observation of the crack formation process was provided by the digital image correlation system. The simplified method for estimating the maximum crack width is proposed. The presented results confirmed the stochastic character of the process of crack formation and development. The maximum crack widths calculated on the basis of the proposed formula were on the safe side in relation to those calculated according to Eurocode 2. It was also confirmed that the distances between cracks do not depend on the loading manner. Hence the density function describing the distribution of distances between cracks can be used to assess the condition of reinforced concrete elements. The research has also shown the suitability of the DIC system (ARAMIS) for testing concrete elements.

Existing buildings, especially historical buildings, require periodic or situational diagnostic tests. If a building is in use, advanced non-destructive or semi-destructive methods should be used. In the diagnosis of reinforced concrete structures, tests allowing to assess the condition of the reinforcement and concrete cover are particularly important. The article presents non-destructive and semi-destructive research methods that are used for such tests, as well as the results of tests performed for selected elements of a historic water tower structure. The assessment of the corrosion risk of the reinforcement was carried out with the use of a semi-destructive galvanostatic pulse method. The protective properties of the concrete cover were checked by the carbonation test and the phase analysis of the concrete. X-ray diffractometry and thermal analysis methods were used for this. In order to determine the position of the reinforcement and to estimate the concrete cover thickness distribution, a ferromagnetic detection system was used. The comprehensive application of several test methods allowed mutual verification of the results and the drawing of reliable conclusions. The results indicated a very poor state of the reinforcement, loss in the depth of cover and sulphate corrosion.

This paper compares three nondestructive methods used to detect and locate defects such as delaminations or voids in externally bonded fiber reinforced polymer (FRP) concrete structures: infrared thermography, ground-penetrating radar, and measurement of acoustic wave velocity. One of the main goals was to check whether it was possible to distinguish overlapping defects. For this purpose, eight concrete samples were made with a bonded carbon fiber reinforced polymer (CFRP) strip with the following dimensions 100 × 100 × 500 mm. Two samples had no defects, four had single defects varying in location (at the edge of the strip or in the centre) simulating delamination or voids in the concrete cover, and the remaining samples had overlapping defects. Both infrared thermography and acoustic wave velocity measurement methods allow the detection of defects/voids in the adhesive layer and a concrete defect (void in the concrete cover). However, ground penetration failed to detect defects in the adhesive layer. Only infrared thermography allows for the differentiation of overlapping defects. On the basis of the conducted research, the methodology, differences, advantages, and limitations of each method were described, along with recommendations based on the authors’ experience.