Forest fires are one of the most severe natural disasters facing global ecosystems, as they have a significant impact on ecological security and social development. As remote sensing technology has developed, burned areas can now be quickly extracted to support fire monitoring and post-disaster recovery. This study focused on monitoring forest fires that occurred in Chongqing, China, in August 2022. The burned area was identified using various satellite images, including Sentinel-2, Landsat8, Environmental Mitigation II A (HJ2A), and Gaofen-6 (GF-6). The burned area was extracted using visual interpretation, differenced Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (dNDVI), and differenced Normalized Burnup Ratio (dNBR). The results showed that: (1) The results of the three monitoring methods were very consistent, with a coefficient of determination R² > 0.96. (2) A threshold method based on the dNBR-extracted burned area was used to analyze fire severity, with moderate-severity fires making up the majority (58.05%) of the fires. (3) Different topographic factors had some influence on the severity of the forest fires. High elevation, steep slopes and the northwestern aspect had the largest percentage of burned area.

Land surface temperature (LST) is a crucial parameter in the study of Land Surface processes. Currently, there are great progresses in LST retrieval based on thermal infrared (TIR) remote sensing. However, TIR-based LST suffers from serious spatial discontinuities due to clouds. Although there are methods developed to address this issue, the methods show high uncertainty in days with extremely clouds. Therefore, this study proposed an integrated method to reconstruct cloudy LSTs using Terra Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) and the China Land Data Assimilation System (CLDAS) LST. This method was separated into two parts according to the ratio of clear-sky pixels (RCP). On days with RCP more than 30%, a random forest reconstruction method was used to establish the complicated relationship between LST and its predicting variables, including solar radiation factor, vegetation index, water index, topographic information and latitude, and then applied to cloudy pixels to derive LSTs. For the rest days, the CLDAS LST was selected to assist the reconstruction via downscaling it to 1 km and then merged with clear-sky data to generate spatially continuous results. The proposed method was applied to the Southwest China and generate daily LST product in 2019. Validation with ground measurements demonstrated a high accuracy with the correlation coefficient changing from 0.73 to 0.88. Additionally, the reconstructed LST dataset exhibits similar temporal variability as existing all-weather satellite-based and reanalysis LST products. The findings reveal that this method shows good potential in generating gap-free LST dataset, especially for the mountain regions with heavy clouds.

The rapid advancement of remote sensing technology has given rise to numerous global- and regional-scale medium- to high-resolution land cover (LC) datasets, making significant contributions to the exploration of worldwide environmental shifts and the sustainable governance of natural resources. Nonetheless, owing to the inherent uncertainties embedded within remote sensing imagery, LC datasets inevitably exhibit inaccuracies. In this study, a local accuracy assessment of LC datasets in Southwest China was conducted. The datasets utilized in our analysis include ESA WorldCover, CLCD, Esri Land Cover, CRLC, FROM-GLC10, GLC_FCS30, GlobeLand30, and SinoLC-1. This study employed a sampling approach that combines proportional allocation and stratified random sampling (SRS) to gather sample points and compute confusion matrices to validate eight LC products. The local accuracy of the eight LC maps differs significantly from the overall accuracy provided by the original authors in Southwest China. ESA WorldCover and CLCD demonstrate higher local accuracy than other products in Southwest China, with their overall accuracy (OA) values being 87.1% and 85.48%, respectively. Simultaneously, we computed the area for each LC map based on categories, quantifying uncertainty through the reporting of confidence intervals for both accuracy and area parameters. This study aims to validate and compare eight LC datasets and assess precision and area of diverse spatial resolution datasets for mapping and monitoring across Southwest China.

Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) Land Surface Temperature (LST) products are essential data sources for global and regional climate change research. Currently, several versions of the MODIS LST product have been released, yet the performance differences and uncertainties they introduce in land surface studies remain insufficiently addressed. To bridge this gap, this study focuses on four distinct versions of the LST product: MxD11A1 Collection 5 (C5), Collection 6 (C6), Collection 6.1 (C6.1), and MxD21A1 Collection 6.1 (MxD21). The spatial resolution of all product generations is 1 km, and the temporal resolution is 0.5 days. This study provides a comprehensive analysis of the errors arising from different generations of these products in various land surface process studies. The error assessment includes cross-comparisons between product versions and evaluations of the absolute errors generated. Absolute errors in evaluation data were collected from 13 surface sites within the Heihe Watershed Allied Telemetry Experimental Research (HiWATER) project during the period 2013–2018. Cross-validation results show that the largest difference between C5 and C6.1 occurs over bare land, with an RMSE of approximately 1.45 K, while there is no significant change between C6 and C6.1. MOD21 shows considerable variation compared to C6.1 at night across different land cover types, with RMSE over cropland exceeding 2 K. The temperature difference between MOD21 and C6.1 is more pronounced at night (2.01 K) than during the day (0.30 K). Validation results based on temperature indicate that C5 has greater uncertainty compared to C6, especially over bare land, where errors are 2.06 K and 1.06 K, respectively. Furthermore, MxD21 demonstrates significant day–night performance discrepancies, with an average bias of 0.10 K at night, while daytime errors over bare land can reach 2 K, potentially influenced by atmospheric conditions. Based on the research in this paper, it is possible to clarify the performance of different versions of MODIS products, reflecting the appropriateness of their past applications; on the other hand, it is recommended to prioritize the use of the MxD11A1 C6 and C6.1 products for monitoring and applications in bare soil areas to ensure higher accuracy. Furthermore, for day and night monitoring, it may be beneficial to alternate between the MxD11A1 and MxD21A1 products to fully leverage their respective advantages and enhance overall monitoring effectiveness.

Accurate estimates of downward surface shortwave radiation (DSSR) are critical for hydrological, biogeochemical, and ecological studies and remote sensing-based estimation of DSSR is an important way to derive DSSR at different spatio-temporal ranges. However, current estimation algorithms usually somewhat rely on atmospheric parameters or in-situ measurements, further blocking the application of these methods. Inspired by the emerging DSSR reanalysis data from the model simulation, this study proposed an integrated method by initializing the estimation model with ERA5 reanalysis data and further refining the estimation through iterative training. The random forest regression method was applied in the estimation model to build the connection between DSSR with the MODIS top-of-atmosphere reflectance, cloud flag, geometry information, elevation, latitude, and coefficient of Sun-Earth distance as input features. To separately consider the impact from cloud cover, the estimation model was established for clear-sky and cloudy-sky conditions, respectively. The proposed method was applied to estimate instantaneous DSSR of MODIS daytime overpasses in the Southwest part of China in 2020. Comparison between the estimates of the initialized model and the finalized model shows that the iterative process improves the DSSR estimates on both spatial distribution and accuracy. Validated by the measurements from nine sites in the study area, the DSSR estimates of the finalized model show a 0.02 higher correlation coefficient (CC) and 7.35 W m ^-2 lower root mean squared error (RMSE) than that of the initialized model. To better evaluate the performance of the proposed method, three popular DSSR products including ERA5, MCD18A1, and Himawari-8 were introduced to make an inter-comparison with the estimation of this study. The validation results showed that the all-sky DSSR estimated in this study had the best accuracy, with a CC of 0.90, a mean bias error of 37.80 W m ^-2 , a RMSE of 125.30 W m ^-2 , and a relative root mean squared error of 42.73%. Obvious improvements can be observed under cloudy-sky and clear-sky conditions, respectively. Because of the simplicity and reliable performance of the proposed method, it shows good potential for DSSR estimation.