Sludge, a by-product of wastewater treatment, contains harmful components that negatively impact the environment. One of the most ecologically viable and cost-effective methods for sludge treatment is anaerobic digestion, which produces biogas and stabilized digestate that can be applied to agricultural land. However, anaerobic digestion has certain limitations that reduce biogas yield. To address these issues, various improvement methods have been developed, including the addition of biochar. Biochar, a carbon-rich biomass, enhances the decomposition of organic matter, reduces ammonia toxicity, and supports the growth of methanogenic archaea. Additionally, biochar improves the quality of the resulting digestate, making it more suitable for agricultural use and plant growth. This sustainable approach to sludge management not only benefits the wastewater sector, but also contributes to the energy and agricultural industries.

Non-invasive acidic pretreatments using acetic acid (1–5 mM) and citric acid (0.02–0.1 g g⁻¹ TS) were investigated to enhance anaerobic digestion (AD) of waste-activated sludge (WAS). Both pretreatments improved short-term process stability, with pH (6.5–7.1) and alkalinity (1000–5000 mg CaCO₃ L⁻¹) remaining within optimal ranges during 10-day digestion. Acetic acid markedly enhanced solubilization and acidification, increasing volatile fatty acids to ~2500 mg L⁻¹ (+67% vs. control), whereas citric acid achieved ~2000 mg L⁻¹ (+37%). EPS analysis revealed pronounced redistribution of polysaccharides and proteins, with acetic acid inducing stronger disruption of the EPS matrix (SB-EPS polysaccharides up to 34.1 mg eq Glc mL⁻¹). Specific methane yield increased from 28.5 mL CH₄ g⁻¹ VS (control) to 101.7 mL CH₄ g⁻¹ VS with acetic acid (3.6-fold) and to 73.8 mL CH₄ g⁻¹ VS with citric acid (2.5-fold). Gompertz modeling confirmed higher maximum methane potential, ~68% higher maximum methane production rates, and reduced lag phases for both pretreatments. In contrast, pharmaceutical concentrations (31 compounds) were largely unaffected by acid pretreatment, with significant reductions observed only for selected biodegradable molecules.

Heavy metals are non-biodegradable environmental pollutants, and if present in sludge/sediment in elevated concentrations, they can cause serious problems. In this paper, the possibility of applying two-anode electrokinetic treatment was investigated for the ex situ remediation of copper (Cu) and nickel (Ni)-contaminated sediments. The influence of the following parameters on the treatment efficiency was investigated: applied electric field, physicochemical changes in the system, and the characteristics of the pollution (concentration and forms of metal occurrence). Additionally, based on the results of the sequential extraction procedure, a risk assessment of sediment before and after treatment was performed. Also, we developed a mathematical model that allows us to define the time required to reduce nickel and copper to non-hazardous levels from contaminated sediment via electrokinetic treatment. The results obtained indicate that changes in the pseudo-total content and changes in Cu and Ni availability along the electrokinetic cell are consistent with the physicochemical changes in the sediment. The amount of applied electric field does not notably affect the treatment efficiency in most cases. Based on the results, the majority of samples of treated sediment can be dislocated without special protection measures. The most acceptable treatment for ex situ remediation is the one with solar panels, as it is considered economically and environmentally most appropriate. For this treatment, according to risk assessment code, the risk was found to be low (Cu) to moderately low (Ni). Since more than 50% of Cu and Ni content is related to the organic and residual fraction, and based on the physicochemical conditions and high percentage of clay, we can assume that there are no environmental hazards. This work serves as a starting point for the developed mathematical model that has proven to be very promising for prediction of the time necessary for sediment metal remediation.

Sludge from wastewater treatment plants as an organic substrate rich in nutrients has great potential for use in agriculture. Given the potential risks of contamination with bacteria, pathogens, heavy metals, preliminary sludge treatment is necessary. Anaerobic digestion of sludge is an environmentally acceptable and energy-efficient method especially if further use of sludge in agriculture is planned, in order to further improve it, additional pretreatments are required. In our study, we used acetic acid as a pretreatment. Acetic acid has been shown to be effective in promoting biogas production. The produced digestate showed an increase in carbon content with in increase in the dose of acetic acid, which is considered suitable for plant growth. The lowest C/N ratio was 5.82 in the sample with highest dose of acetic acid. Analyzed sludge is rich in nutrients; the phosphours concentration is 50 mg/L, while magnesium is 11.4 mg/L. Heavy metal concentrations are low, which reduces the risk from contaminations. All of the above points to the convinience of applying sludge to agricultural lands, which would strengthen the agricultural sector and replace the use commercial artificial fertilizers.