Laia Fontané

Ms. Laia Fontané


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

1Year (2026-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
30 January 2026 in Nutrients
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LFLaia Fontané
Laia Fontané
MRMaria Helena Reig
Maria Helena Reig
MHMíriam Herranz
Míriam Herranz
MRMaria Antònia Roig
Maria Antònia Roig
APAltea Perez
Altea Perez
David BenaigesDavid Benaiges
David Benaiges
Background/Objectives: The Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition (GLIM) recently updated its inflammation criterion through a Delphi consensus to standardize its assessment. This study aimed to assess the impact of these new recommendations on the concurrent and predictive validity of the GLIM criteria in hospitalized medical patients. Methods: This post hoc analysis re-evaluated a previously published cohort of 119 hospitalized patients with acute medical conditions, originally assessed using the GLIM criteria and the Subjective Global Assessment (SGA) as the reference standard. Inflammation was redefined according to the 2024 GLIM Delphi consensus, and the concurrent and predictive validity of the modified GLIM criteria (GLIM-I) were examined. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to compare the discriminative ability of SGA, original GLIM, and GLIM-I to predict prolonged hospital stay. Results: With the updated inflammation definition, all patients met the etiologic criterion, increasing malnutrition prevalence from 41.7% to 52.2%. GLIM-I showed a sensitivity of 78.0% and specificity of 67.7% versus SGA, not reaching the predefined ≥80% threshold for concurrent validity. Predictive validity was maintained (adjusted odds ratio (OR) = 3.40; 95% CI: 1.31–8.83). SGA achieved the highest discriminative ability (area under the curve (AUC) = 0.783; 95% CI: 0.693–0.874), significantly outperforming the original GLIM (AUC = 0.723; 95% CI: 0.616–0.830; p = 0.049). GLIM-I showed similar performance (AUC = 0.731; 95% CI: 0.620–0.843; p = 0.727). Conclusions: SGA should continue to be considered the method of choice for nutritional diagnosis in hospitalized medical patients. Further research is needed to determine how the new inflammation criteria influence the validity of the GLIM framework in other clinical contexts before their widespread implementation.

26 June 2026 in Nutrients
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MAMaryam Choulli Amgait
Maryam Choulli Amgait
Sara TousSara Tous
Sara Tous
GPGonzalo Peón Pena
Gonzalo Peón Pena
BCBeatriz Oncology Cirauqui
Beatriz Oncology Cirauqui
ASAnna Sumarroca
Anna Sumarroca
LALorena Arribas
Lorena Arribas
Background/Objectives: Human papillomavirus (HPV) is a well-established prognostic marker in oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC); however, the short-term treatment response remains heterogeneous, particularly among HPV-positive patients. Given the high prevalence of malnutrition in head and neck cancer, this study examined whether baseline nutritional status, body composition and functional status were associated with early treatment response in OPSCC according to HPV status. Methods: A prospective observational multicenter cohort study of newly diagnosed OPSCC patients eligible for curative-intent treatment was conducted at three tertiary hospitals in Barcelona, Spain. Baseline assessments comprised anthropometry, computed tomography (CT)-based body composition at L3, functional performance tests, systemic inflammatory biomarkers and nutritional diagnosis by the Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment (PG-SGA). Early treatment response, assessed around 12 weeks post-therapy, was classified as complete remission (CR) or non-complete remission (NCR). Classification tree analyses were performed separately by HPV status. Results: Of 101 enrolled patients, 97 completed post-treatment assessment, of whom 51% were HPV-positive. Among HPV-positive patients, PG-SGA score was the main discriminating variable for early response within the classification tree model, with CR achieved in 74% of patients scoring <6 versus 33% of those scoring ≥6 (AUC 0.68, 95% CI 0.55–0.82). Conversely, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) and age were the primary discriminating variables in HPV-negative patients (AUC 0.81, 95% CI 0.70–0.93). In both HPV subgroups, body composition and inflammatory markers were not retained in the analysis once nutritional and functional status were considered. Conclusions: PG-SGA-defined nutritional status was associated with early treatment response in HPV-positive patients, while functional status was the main variable retained in HPV-negative patients. These findings support the potential clinical value of standardized nutritional assessment in OPSCC and suggest that early identification of poor nutritional status or functional impairment may help refine supportive care planning at treatment initiation.