Eva Harmel

Dr. Eva Harmel

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

5Years (2022-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
13 December 2022 in Life
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
TSTimo Schmitz
Timo Schmitz
EHEva Harmel
Eva Harmel
MHMargit Heier
Margit Heier
APAnnette Peters
Annette Peters
JLJakob Linseisen
Jakob Linseisen
CMChrista Meisinger
Christa Meisinger
The aim of this study was to compare characteristics of incident acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and first and second time reinfarctions in terms of sociodemographic characteristics, comorbidities, symptoms, treatment, clinical characteristics, medication and outcome. A further aim was to identify predictors for an increased risk of hospitalized reinfarction. Between 2000 and 2017, a total of 13,276 AMI cases were recorded by a population-based registry in the area of Augsburg, Germany, and were included in this study (11,871 incident events, 1217 cases of first-time reinfarction and 202 cases of second-time reinfarction). Median follow-up time was 5.3 years. For differences in baseline characteristics, Chi-square tests and analysis of variance (ANOVA) were calculated. To determine factors that are associated with an increased risk of hospitalized reinfarction COX regression models were fitted. Myocardial reinfarctions differ from incident events in some major characteristics such as the frequency of comorbidities, laboratory values, ECG presentation and therapy, but not regarding 28-day mortality. Moreover, typical comorbidities and risk factors (diabetes, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, smoking, impaired renal function) are associated with an increased risk of hospitalized reinfarction. Conversely, STEMI ECG, being married, German nationality and bypass surgery are predictors for a lower risk of hospitalized reinfarction. Incident AMI and reinfarction are distinctly different in many characteristics, which physicians should have in mind when treating patients with prior AMI. Typical comorbidities are risk factors for hospitalized reinfarction. This underlines the importance of comprehensive treatment of these comorbidities including education of patients and encouragement towards lifestyle adjustments.

4 January 2024 in The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
FRFranka Risch
Franka Risch
EHEva Harmel
Eva Harmel
KRKatharina Rippel
Katharina Rippel
BWBastian Wein
Bastian Wein
PRPhilip Raake
Philip Raake
JDJosua A. Decker
Josua A. Decker
The aim of our study was to evaluate two different virtual non-contrast (VNC) algorithms applied to photon counting detector (PCD)-CT data in terms of noise, effectiveness of contrast media subtraction and aortic valve calcium (AVC) scoring compared to reference true non-contrast (TNC)-based results. Consecutive patients underwent TAVR planning examination comprising a TNC scan, followed by a CTA of the heart. VNC series were reconstructed using a conventional (VNCconv) and a calcium-preserving (VNCpc) algorithm. Noise was analyzed by means of the standard deviation of CT-values within the left ventricle. To assess the effectiveness of contrast media removal, heart volumes were segmented and the proportion of their histograms > 130HU was taken. AVC was measured by Agatston and volume score. 41 patients were included. Comparable noise levels to TNC were achieved with all VNC reconstructions. Contrast media was effectively virtually removed (proportions > 130HU from 81% to < 1%). Median calcium scores derived from VNCconv underestimated TNC-based scores (up to 74%). Results with smallest absolute difference to TNC were obtained with VNCpc reconstructions (0.4 mm, Br36, QIR 4), but with persistent significant underestimation (median 29%). Both VNC algorithms showed near-perfect (r²>0.9) correlation with TNC. Thin-slice VNC reconstructions provide equivalent noise levels to standard thick-slice TNC series and effective virtual removal of iodinated contrast. AVC scoring was feasible on both VNC series, showing near-perfect correlation, but with significant underestimation. VNCpc with 0.4 mm slices and Br36 kernel at QIR 4 gave the most comparable results and, with further advances, could be a promising replacement for additional TNC.

Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SKStephanie Gladys Kühne
Stephanie Gladys Kühne
APAndrea Patrignani Patrignani
Andrea Patrignani Patrignani
SWSimon Woelbert
Simon Woelbert
EHEva Harmel
Eva Harmel
DPDamyan Penev
Damyan Penev
DBDario Bongiovanni
Dario Bongiovanni
Severe mitral regurgitation (MR) is one of the most common valvular heart diseases and is frequently associated with advanced left ventricular (LV) systolic dysfunction. Transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER) offers effective symptom relief but may induce abrupt hemodynamic changes leading to afterload mismatch and acute LV failure. Levosimendan may help mitigate this complication by improving contractility, yet evidence supporting its use in this setting is scarce. Therefore, the aim of this study was to systematically evaluate the evidence on the effects of Levosimendan in patients with severe MR and LV dysfunction undergoing TEER. We performed a comprehensive search of PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Google Scholar. Primary outcomes were postprocedural LV ejection fraction (LVEF) and systolic pulmonary artery pressure (sPAP). Secondary outcomes included procedural success, procedure duration, and in-hospital complications. Five studies comprising 315 patients (n = 141 Levosimendan, n = 174 controls) met the inclusion criteria. Pooled analysis showed no significant difference in postprocedural LVEF between Levosimendan-treated patients and controls (mean difference 0.45%, 95% CI [−1.46–2.35] p = 0.65) and no significant change from baseline. Similarly, postprocedural sPAP did not differ significantly. Procedural success was higher with Levosimendan, and procedure duration was shorter. These hypothesis-generating findings highlight the need for larger, prospective randomized trials to clarify the role of Levosimendan in this setting.