David Rodríguez Salgado

Dr. David Rodríguez Salgado

Escuela de Ingenierías Industriales, University of Extremadura, 06006 Badajoz, Spain
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

23Years (2004-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
9 January 2020 in Materials
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JMJorge Barrios Muriel
Jorge Barrios Muriel
Francisco RomeroFrancisco Romero
Francisco Romero
FAFrancisco Javier Alonso-Sánchez
Francisco Javier Alonso-Sánchez
David Rodríguez SalgadoDavid Rodríguez Salgado
David Rodríguez Salgado
In this work, the recent advances for rapid prototyping in the orthoprosthetic industry are presented. Specifically, the manufacturing process of orthoprosthetic aids are analysed, as thier use is widely extended in orthopedic surgery. These devices are devoted to either correct posture or movement (orthosis) or to substitute a body segment (prosthesis) while maintaining functionality. The manufacturing process is traditionally mainly hand-crafted: The subject’s morphology is taken by means of plaster molds, and the manufacture is performed individually, by adjusting the prototype over the subject. This industry has incorporated computer aided design (CAD), computed aided engineering (CAE) and computed aided manufacturing (CAM) tools; however, the true revolution is the result of the application of rapid prototyping technologies (RPT). Techniques such as fused deposition modelling (FDM), selective laser sintering (SLS), laminated object manufacturing (LOM), and 3D printing (3DP) are some examples of the available methodologies in the manufacturing industry that, step by step, are being included in the rehabilitation engineering market—an engineering field with growth and prospects in the coming years. In this work we analyse different methodologies for additive manufacturing along with the principal methods for collecting 3D body shapes and their application in the manufacturing of functional devices for rehabilitation purposes such as splints, ankle-foot orthoses, or arm prostheses.

1 November 2007 in International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
David Rodríguez SalgadoDavid Rodríguez Salgado
David Rodríguez Salgado
FAFrancisco Javier Alonso-Sánchez
Francisco Javier Alonso-Sánchez

1 April 2008 in Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
FAFrancisco Javier Alonso-Sánchez
Francisco Javier Alonso-Sánchez
David Rodríguez SalgadoDavid Rodríguez Salgado
David Rodríguez Salgado

6 September 2008 in The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
David Rodríguez SalgadoDavid Rodríguez Salgado
David Rodríguez Salgado
FAFrancisco Javier Alonso-Sánchez
Francisco Javier Alonso-Sánchez
ICI. Cambero
I. Cambero
AMA. Marcelo
A. Marcelo

1 February 2006 in Journal of Materials Processing Technology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
David Rodríguez SalgadoDavid Rodríguez Salgado
David Rodríguez Salgado
FAFrancisco Javier Alonso-Sánchez
Francisco Javier Alonso-Sánchez

30 August 2018 in Energies
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
A.G. GonzálezA.G. González
A.G. González
Justo Garcia-Sanz-CalcedoJusto Garcia-Sanz-Calcedo
Justo Garcia-Sanz-Calcedo
David Rodríguez SalgadoDavid Rodríguez Salgado
David Rodríguez Salgado
The use of benchmarking in the management of healthcare facilities enables immediate comparison between hospitals. Benchmarking allows ascertaining their expected energy consumption and estimating the possible savings margin. In the 2005–2015 period, 90 EU Eco-Audits of 23 public hospitals in Germany were studied to analyze the energy consumption related with weather conditions, built surface area, gross domestic product (GDP), geographic location (GL), bed numbers, and employee numbers. The results reveal that the average annual energy consumption of a hospital under normal conditions, both climatic and operational, is 0.27 MWh/m2, 14.37 MWh/worker, and 23.41 MWh/bed. The indicator dependent on the number of beds proved to be the most suitable as a reference to quantify the energy consumption of a hospital.