Kuzmina Oxana

Dr. Kuzmina Oxana


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

7Years (2020-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
16 November 2020 in Minerals
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Sergey KhromykhSergey Khromykh
Sergey Khromykh
Tatyana OitsevaTatyana Oitseva
Tatyana Oitseva
PKPavel Kotler
Pavel Kotler
BDBoris Dyachkov
Boris Dyachkov
SSSergey Zakharovich Smirnov
Sergey Zakharovich Smirnov
BABakytgul Agaliyeva
Bakytgul Agaliyeva
The paper presents new geological, mineralogical, and isotope geochronological data for rare-metal pegmatites in the Kalba granitic batholith (Eastern Kazakhstan). Mineralization is especially abundant in the Central-Kalba ore district, where pegmatite bodies occur at the top of large granite plutons and at intersections of deep faults. The pegmatites contain several successive mineral assemblages from barren quartz-microcline and quartz-microcline-albite to Li-Cs-Ta-Nb-Be-Sn-bearing cleavelandite-lepidolite-spodumene. Ar-Ar muscovite and lepidolite ages bracket the metallogenic event between 291 and 286 Ma. The pegmatite mineral deposits formed synchronously with the emplacement of the phase 1 Kalba granites during the evolution of hydrous silicate rare-metal magmas that are produced by the differentiation of granite magma at large sources with possible inputs of F and rare metals with fluids.

10 June 2022 in Minerals
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
BDBoris Dyachkov
Boris Dyachkov
MMMarina Alexandrovna Mizernaya
Marina Alexandrovna Mizernaya
Sergey KhromykhSergey Khromykh
Sergey Khromykh
ABAinel Y. Bissatova
Ainel Y. Bissatova
Tatyana OitsevaTatyana Oitseva
Tatyana Oitseva
YYYertay T. Yeskaliyev
Yertay T. Yeskaliyev
The Great Altai region, located at the boundary of Russia, Mongolia, China, and Kazakhstan, belongs to the system of the Central Asian Orogenic Belt. It has undergone a long complex geological and metallogenic history. Extremely rich resources of base, precious, and rare metals (Fe, Cu, Pb, Zn, Ag, Au, Li, Cs, Ta, Nb, REE, etc.) maintain developed mining and metallurgical industry, especially in East Kazakhstan, which is the key metallogenic province. The East Kazakhstan province comprises the Rudny Altai, Kalba-Narym, West-Kalba, and Zharma-Saur metallogenic belts, each having its typical mineralization profiles and deposits. The reconstructed geodynamic and metallogenic history of the Great Altai province, along with the revealed relationships between tectonic settings and mineralization patterns, allowed us to formulate a number of geodynamic, structural, lithostratigraphic, magmatic, mineralogical, and geochemical criteria for exploration and appraisal of mineral potential in Eastern Kazakhstan. Geodynamic criteria are based on the origin of different mineralization types in certain geodynamic settings during the Late Paleozoic–Early Mesozoic orogenic cycle. Structural criteria mean that the location of base-metal deposits in Rudny Altai, gold deposits in the West Kalba belt, rare and base metals in the Kalba-Narym and Zharma-Saur zones is controlled by faults of different sizes. Lithostratigraphic criteria consist of the relation of orebodies with certain types of sedimentary or volcanic-sedimentary rocks. Magmatic criteria are due to the relation between mineralization types and igneous lithologies. Mineralogical and geochemical criteria include typical minerals and elements that can serve as tracers of mineralization. The joint use of all these criteria will open new avenues in prospecting and exploration at a more advanced level.

28 February 2021 in Minerals
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
BDBoris Dyachkov
Boris Dyachkov
ABAinel Y. Bissatova
Ainel Y. Bissatova
MMMarina Alexandrovna Mizernaya
Marina Alexandrovna Mizernaya
Sergey KhromykhSergey Khromykh
Sergey Khromykh
Tatyana OitsevaTatyana Oitseva
Tatyana Oitseva
SASaltanat S. Aitbayeva
Saltanat S. Aitbayeva
Replenishment of mineral resources, especially gold and rare metals, is critical for progress in the mining and metallurgical industry of Eastern Kazakhstan. To substantiate the scientific background for mineral exploration, we study microinclusions in minerals from gold and rare-metal fields, as well as trace-element patterns in ores and their hosts that may mark gold and rare-metal mineralization. The revealed compositions of gold-bearing sulfide ores and a number of typical minerals (magnetite, goethite, arsenopyrite, antimonite, gold and silver) and elements (Fe, Mn, Cu, Pb, Zn, As, and Sb) can serve as exploration guides. The analyzed samples contain rare micrometer lead (alamosite, kentrolite, melanotekite, cotunnite) and nickel (bunsenite, trevorite, gersdorffite) phases and accessory cassiterite, wolframite, scheelite, and microlite. The ores bear native gold (with Ag and Pt impurities) amenable to concentration by gravity and flotation methods. Multistage rare-metal pegmatite mineralization can be predicted from the presence of mineral assemblages including cleavelandite, muscovite, lepidolite, spodumene, pollucite, tantalite, microlite, etc. and such elements as Ta, Nb, Be, Li, Cs, and Sn. Pegmatite veins bear diverse Ta minerals (columbite, tantalite-columbite, manganotantalite, ixiolite, and microlite) that accumulated rare metals late during the evolution of the pegmatite magmatic system. The discovered mineralogical and geochemical criteria are useful for exploration purposes.

15 July 2025 in Minerals
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Tatyana OitsevaTatyana Oitseva
Tatyana Oitseva
Sergey KhromykhSergey Khromykh
Sergey Khromykh
ANAnna V. Naryzhnova
Anna V. Naryzhnova
PKPavel Kotler
Pavel Kotler
MMMarina Alexandrovna Mizernaya
Marina Alexandrovna Mizernaya
АДАртём Константинович Дремов
Артём Константинович Дремов
The Kalba–Narym metallogenic belt is located in East Kazakhstan, which displays rare metal mineralization. The Kvartsevoye rare metal Li–Ta–Nb deposit is located in the north-western ore district. This study presents the results of geological, mineralogical, geochemical, and geochronological analyses of rare metal granite pegmatites. Rare metal mineralization belongs to a field of variably differentiated pegmatites, including barren, quartz–albite–muscovite, muscovite, and muscovite–quartz–albite microcline mineral associations. This study established that the rare metal mineralization is localized in the quartz–albite–muscovite zone. The main concentrator minerals of rare metals are spodumene for Li and tantalite–columbite for Ta and Nb. Ar/Ar dating of the muscovite allowed us to establish the age of mineralization during the period of 288–285 Ma. The present study enabled the linkage of rare metal mineralization with the differentiation processes of the granites of the Kalba complex.

9 February 2026 in Minerals
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MMMarina Alexandrovna Mizernaya
Marina Alexandrovna Mizernaya
SASaltanat Aitbayeva
Saltanat Aitbayeva
PKPavel Kotler
Pavel Kotler
ADAlla Dolgopolova
Alla Dolgopolova
RSReimar Seltmann
Reimar Seltmann
ABAkmaral Baisalova
Akmaral Baisalova
This study investigates the trace-element geochemistry of rare-metal pegmatites from the Kalba–Narym Batholith, Eastern Kazakhstan, to establish geochemical indicators of zonation and subtype differentiation within pegmatite fields. Detailed ICP-MS analyses of muscovite and K-feldspar reveal systematic variations in Li, Cs, Rb, Ta, Nb, P, and Ga contents that reflect progressive melt fractionation during the evolution of granitic magmas. These data allow the identification of four main pegmatite subtypes, including barren, beryl, albite–spodumene, and albite, representing successive stages of LCT (Li-Cs-Ta) pegmatite evolution. Both vertical and lateral geochemical zonation are recognized across the Kalba–Narym Batholith, controlled by magmatic differentiation and volatile enrichment. The results highlight the diagnostic value of trace-element systematics in rock-forming minerals as reliable indicators of fractionation and ore potential, and they provide quantitative criteria for the classification and exploration of rare-metal pegmatites within the Kalba–Narym Batholith.

19 September 2026 in Minerals
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
KOKuzmina Oxana
Kuzmina Oxana
Sergey KhromykhSergey Khromykh
Sergey Khromykh
MTMaria Dmitrievna Tsareva
Maria Dmitrievna Tsareva
ASArseniy Dmitrievich Senko
Arseniy Dmitrievich Senko
MSMaria Shapovalova
Maria Shapovalova
MMMarina Alexandrovna Mizernaya
Marina Alexandrovna Mizernaya
This study presents new data on the Cherdoyak Sn–W deposit in Eastern Kazakhstan. The deposit is spatially associated with the northeastern contact of the Cherdoyak granite intrusion and comprises a stockwork of quartz veins and greisen bodies developed within the earlier-emplaced Kunush granite intrusion. Three granite varieties were distinguished: (1) biotite plagiogranites of the Kunush massif, (2) first-phase biotite granites of the Cherdoyak intrusion, and (3) second-phase muscovite granites and leucogranites of the Cherdoyak intrusion. The Kunush granites underwent extensive graphitization and greisenization, resulting in the development of stockwork-type Sn–W–As mineralization composed of cassiterite, scheelite, and arsenopyrite. The crystallization ages of the granites were determined by U–Pb zircon geochronology and yielded ages of 296 Ma for the Kunush intrusion, 290 Ma for the first-phase Cherdoyak intrusion, and 289 Ma for the second-phase intrusion. Muscovite from the Cherdoyak greisens yielded an Ar/Ar age of 280 ± 5 Ma. The available geochronological and geochemical evidence suggest a genetic relationship of Cherdoyak deposit with the emplacement and magmatic evolution of the Cherdoyak intrusion. Ore formation was driven by advanced fluid–magma differentiation during the evolution of the Cherdoyak magmatic system.