Chordoma and chondrosarcoma share common radiographic characteristics yet are distinct clinically. A radiomic machine learning model differentiating these tumors preoperatively would help plan surgery. MR images were acquired from 57 consecutive patients with chordoma (N = 32) or chondrosarcoma (N = 25) treated at the University of Tokyo Hospital between September 2012 and February 2020. Preoperative T1-weighted images with gadolinium enhancement (GdT1) and T2-weighted images were analyzed. Datasets from the first 47 cases were used for model creation, and those from the subsequent 10 cases were used for validation. Feature extraction was performed semi-automatically, and 2438 features were obtained per image sequence. Machine learning models with logistic regression and a support vector machine were created. The model with the highest accuracy incorporated seven features extracted from GdT1 in the logistic regression. The average area under the curve was 0.93 ± 0.06, and accuracy was 0.90 (9/10) in the validation dataset. The same validation dataset was assessed by 20 board-certified neurosurgeons. Diagnostic accuracy ranged from 0.50 to 0.80 (median 0.60, 95% confidence interval 0.60 ± 0.06%), which was inferior to that of the machine learning model (p = 0.03), although there are some limitations, such as the risk of overfitting and the lack of an extramural cohort for truly independent final validation. In summary, we created a novel MRI-based machine learning model to differentiate skull base chordoma and chondrosarcoma from multiparametric signatures.

We aimed to predict the neurological prognosis of cardiac arrest (CA) patients using quantitative imaging biomarkers extracted from brain computed tomography images. We retrospectively enrolled 86 CA patients (good prognosis, 32; poor prognosis, 54) who were treated at three hospitals between 2017 and 2019. We then extracted 1131 quantitative imaging biomarkers from whole-brain and local volumes of interest in the computed tomography images of the patients. The data were split into training and test sets containing 60 and 26 samples, respectively, and the training set was used to select representative quantitative imaging biomarkers for classification. In univariate analysis, the classification was evaluated using the p-value of the Brunner-Munzel test and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for the test set. In multivariate analysis, machine learning models reflecting nonlinear and complex relations were trained, and they were evaluated using the AUC on the test set. The best performance provided p = 0.009 (<0.01) and an AUC of 0.775 (95% confidence interval, 0.590-0.960) for the univariate analysis and an AUCof0.813 (95% confidence interval, 0.640-0.985) for the multivariate analysis. Overall, the gray level with the maximum gradient in the histogram of the three-dimensionally low-pass-filtered image was an important feature for prediction across the analyses. Quantitative imaging biomarkers can be used in neurological prognosis prediction for CA patients. Relevant biomarkers may contribute to protocolized computed tomography image acquisition to ensure proper decision support in acute care.

Background/Objectives: The severity of radiation-induced toxicity in head and neck cancer (HNC) radiotherapy should be predicted for the prognosis of the patient’s quality of life. Multiple organs at risk (OARs) are susceptible to toxicity in the head and neck. Hence, we aimed to investigate the feasibility of evaluating radiation-induced xerostomia and dysphagia based on multi-OAR dosiomics in HNC radiotherapy. Methods: We used radiotherapy treatment planning and toxicity data collected from 44 patients with HNC. High- and low-toxicity grades were classified using dosiomic models derived from multiple OARs. Dosiomic features were computed from the planned dose distribution per OAR. A prediction model was derived using selected dosiomic features and toxicity grades based on extreme gradient boosting for every OAR and all OARs. The model performance was evaluated in terms of the area under the curve (AUC) from leave-one-out cross-validation. Models based on dose volume histogram features and combining these with dosiomic features were derived to compare the prediction performance per OAR. Performance comparisons across OARs were also conducted. Results: The prediction models with the highest AUCs for xerostomia and dysphagia were the dosiomic model using all OARs, with an AUC of 0.843 (95% confidence interval—CI, 0.725–0.961), and that using the middle pharyngeal constrictor muscle, with an AUC of 0.878 (95% CI, 0.772–0.984). Conclusions: The evaluation results demonstrated the feasibility and potential of predicting radiation-induced toxicities based on multi-OAR dosiomics in HNC radiotherapy. Further investigations are required to determine the generalizability of our findings.