Luis Leon-Mateos

Dr. Luis Leon-Mateos

Hospital Clinico Universitario Santiago de Compostela
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

26Years (2001-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 January 2013 in American Journal of Roentgenology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
RGRoberto García-Figueiras
Roberto García-Figueiras
VGVicky Goh
Vicky Goh
APAnwar R. Padhani
Anwar R. Padhani
SBSandra Baleato-González
Sandra Baleato-González
MGMiguel Garrido
Miguel Garrido
AGAntonio Gomez-Caamaño
Antonio Gomez-Caamaño
OBJECTIVE. This article summarizes the current status of CT perfusion in oncologic imaging, including lesion characterization, staging, prediction of patient outcome or response to therapy, assessment of response to different therapies, and evaluation of tumor relapse. Technical limitations and drawbacks of CT perfusion are also discussed. CONCLUSION. Tumor angiogenesis is essential for cancer growth and provides an attractive target for oncologic therapies. CT perfusion is an emerging imaging tool that provides both qualitative and quantitative information regarding tumor angiogenesis.

28 October 2020 in Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
EBElena María Brozos-Vázquez
Elena María Brozos-Vázquez
RDRoberto Diaz-Peña
Roberto Diaz-Peña
Jorge Garcia-GonzalezJorge Garcia-Gonzalez
Jorge Garcia-Gonzalez
LLLuis Leon-Mateos
Luis Leon-Mateos
PMPatricia Mondelo-Macía
Patricia Mondelo-Macía
RLRafael López-López
Rafael López-López

1 October 2002 in Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
CGChristian Gortázar
Christian Gortázar
JVJ. Vicente
J. Vicente
YFY. Fierro
Y. Fierro
LLLuis Leon-Mateos
Luis Leon-Mateos
MPMARIA JOSE CUBERO PABLO
MARIA JOSE CUBERO PABLO
MGM. González
M. González

1 June 2020 in Radiation Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
AZAlmudena Zapatero
Almudena Zapatero
AGAntonio Gómez-Caamaño
Antonio Gómez-Caamaño
MRMaría Ángeles Cabeza Rodriguez
María Ángeles Cabeza Rodriguez
LMLaura Muinelo
Laura Muinelo
CVCarmen Martin de Vidales
Carmen Martin de Vidales
LPLorena Vega Vega Piris
Lorena Vega Vega Piris
Background: Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) are an established prognostic marker in castration-resistant prostate cancer but have received little attention in localized high-risk disease. We studied the detection rate of CTCs in patients with high-risk prostate cancer before and after androgen deprivation therapy and radiotherapy to assess its value as a prognostic and monitoring marker. Patients and methods: We performed a prospective analysis of CTCs in the peripheral blood of 65 treatment-naïve patients with high-risk prostate cancer. EpCAM-positive CTCs were enumerated using the CELLSEARCH system at 4 timepoints. A cut off of 0 vs ≥ 1 CTC/7.5 ml blood was defined as a threshold for negative versus positive CTCs status. Results: CTCs were detected in 5/65 patients (7.5%) at diagnosis, 8/62 (12.9%) following neoadjuvant androgen deprivation and 11/59 (18.6%) at the end of radiotherapy, with a median CTC count/7.5 ml of 1 (range, 1–136). Only 1 patient presented a positive CTC result 9 months after radiotherapy. Positive CTC status (at any timepoint) was not significantly associated with any clinical or pathologic factors. However, when we analyzed variations in CTC patterns following treatment, we observed a significant association between conversion of CTCs and stages T3 (P = 0.044) and N1 (P = 0.002). Detection of CTCs was not significantly associated with overall survival (P > 0.40). Conclusions: Our study showed a low detection rate for CTCs in patients with locally advanced high-risk prostate cancer. The finding of a de novo positive CTC count after androgen deprivation therapy is probably due to a passive mechanism associated with the destruction of the tumor. Further studies with larger samples and based on more accurate detection of CTCs are needed to determine the potential prognostic and therapeutic value of this approach in non-metastatic prostate cancer. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT01800058.

31 August 2021 in Molecular Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
PMPatricia Mondelo
Patricia Mondelo
JGJorge García‐GonzálEz
Jorge García‐GonzálEz
LLLuis Leon-Mateos
Luis Leon-Mateos
UAUrbano Anido
Urbano Anido
SASantiago Aguín
Santiago Aguín
RDRoberto Diaz-Peña
Roberto Diaz-Peña
Immune checkpoint inhibitors, such as pembrolizumab, are revolutionizing therapeutic strategies for different cancer types, including non‐small‐cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, only a subset of patients benefits from this therapy, and new biomarkers are needed to select better candidates. In this study, we explored the value of liquid biopsy analyses, including circulating free DNA (cfDNA) and circulating tumour cells (CTCs), as a prognostic or predictive tool to guide pembrolizumab therapy. For this purpose, a total of 109 blood samples were collected from 50 patients with advanced NSCLC prior to treatment onset and at 6 and 12 weeks after the initiation of pembrolizumab. Plasma cfDNA was measured using hTERT quantitative PCR assay. The CTC levels at baseline were also analysed using two enrichment technologies (CellSearch® and Parsortix systems) to evaluate the efficacy of both approaches at detecting the presence of programmed cell death ligand 1 on CTCs. Notably, patients with high baseline hTERT cfDNA levels had significantly shorter progression‐free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) than those with low baseline levels. Moreover, patients with unfavourable changes in the hTERT cfDNA levels from baseline to 12 weeks showed a higher risk of disease progression. Additionally, patients in whom CTCs were detected using the CellSearch® system had significantly shorter PFS and OS than patients who had no CTCs. Finally, multivariate regression analyses confirmed the value of the combination of CTCs and cfDNA levels as an early independent predictor of disease progression, identifying a subgroup of patients who were negative for CTCs, who presented low levels of cfDNA and who particularly benefited from the treatment.

1 April 2016 in Annals of Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
BPB. Pérez-Valderrama
B. Pérez-Valderrama
JAJ.A. Arranz Arija
J.A. Arranz Arija
ASA. Rodríguez Sánchez
A. Rodríguez Sánchez
AMA. Pinto Marín
A. Pinto Marín
PGP. Borrega García
P. Borrega García
JLJ.L. González Larriba
J.L. González Larriba
Background Patients with metastatic renal carcinoma (mRCC) treated with first-line pazopanib were not included in the International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium (IMDC) prognostic model. SPAZO (NCT02282579) was a nation-wide retrospective observational study designed to assess the effectiveness and validate the IMDC prognostic model in patients treated with first-line pazopanib in clinical practice. Patients and Methods Data of 278 patients, treated with first-line pazopanib for mRCC in 34 centres in Spain, were locally recorded and externally validated. Mean age was 66 years, there were 68.3% male, 93.5% clear cell type, 74.8% nephrectomized, and 81.3% had ECOG 0-1. Metastatic sites were: lung 70.9%, lymph node 43.9%, bone 26.3%, soft tissue/skin 20.1%, liver 15.1%, CNS 7.2%, adrenal gland 6.5%, pleura/peritoneum 5.8%, pancreas 5%, and kidney 2.2%. After median follow-up of 23 months, 76.4% had discontinued pazopanib, (57.2% due to progression), 47.9% had received 2nd-line targeted therapy, and 48.9% had died. Results According to IMDC prognostic model, 19.4% had favourable-risk (FR), 57.2% intermediate-risk (IR), and 23.4% poor-risk (PR). No unexpected toxicities were recorded. Response rate was 30.3% (FR: 44%, IR: 30% PR: 17.3%). Median progression-free survival (whole population) was 11 months (32 in FR, 11 in IR, 4 in PR). Median and 2-year overall survival (whole population) were 22 months and 48.1% respectively, (FR: not reached and 81.6%, IR: 22 and 48.7%, PR: 7 and 18.8%). These estimations and their 95% confidence intervals are fully consistent with the outcomes predicted by the IMDC prognostic model. Conclusion Our results validate the IMDC model for first-line pazopanib in mRCC, and confirm the effectiveness and safety of this treatment.