Matías Pozo

Mr. Matías Pozo

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

2Years (2025-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
11 July 2025 in Diabetology & Metabolic Syndrome
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
NMNayely García Méndez
Nayely García Méndez
María Fernanda GarcíaMaría Fernanda García
María Fernanda García
EMEdgardo Álvarez Muñoz
Edgardo Álvarez Muñoz
JRJosue Rivadeneira
Josue Rivadeneira
PCPatricio Javier Besnier Cabrera
Patricio Javier Besnier Cabrera
MPMatías Pozo
Matías Pozo
The integration of new technologies has shown potential to enhance self-care practices among patients with diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs). Understanding the effectiveness of these interventions can inform clinical and public health strategies to prevent complications and improve patient outcomes. This scoping review aims to assess the impact of digital and educational technologies on self-care practices and health outcomes in individuals with diabetic foot ulcers. Databases searched encompassed EMBASE, MEDLINE, SciELO, WoS, Scopus, and PubMed, covering publications up to September 2024. The search strategy incorporated MeSH terms and keywords related to “self-care,” “diabetic foot ulcers,” and “educational technology.” After duplicate removal, titles and abstracts were screened independently by three reviewers. Full texts of selected articles were analyzed, and data regarding study design, interventions, outcomes, and populations were extracted using standardized forms. Discrepancies were resolved by consensus. From 442 identified records, 12 studies met inclusion criteria, primarily highlighting the role of mobile applications and digital educational tools in enhancing self-care behaviors, adherence, and complication prevention. Positive effects on patient knowledge and routine adherence were frequently reported. Technological interventions show promise in improving self-care among DFU patients; however, further high-quality, longitudinal studies are needed to establish best practices and long-term benefits.

16 October 2026 in Cancers
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
PCPaz Cook
Paz Cook
RPRuth M. Pfeiffer
Ruth M. Pfeiffer
JSJennifer S Smith
Jennifer S Smith
JAJuan Carlos Araya
Juan Carlos Araya
NMNoldy Mardones
Noldy Mardones
TGthe Chile BiLS Study Group
the Chile BiLS Study Group
Background/Objectives: Gallbladder cancer (GBC) remains a leading cause of cancer death in Chilean women. Gallstones are present in >90% of GBC cases, but few individuals with gallstones develop cancer, suggesting additional factors are needed. Methods: To determine whether obesity increases the risk of progression from gallstones to high-grade dysplasia (HGD) and GBC, we used data from the Chile Biliary Longitudinal Study, 2016–2025, comprising women with ultrasound-detected gallstones in high-incidence regions of Chile.We measured body mass index (BMI) and waist-to-height ratio (WHtR) at baseline and up to two follow-up visits. We used Cox proportional-hazards models with age as the time scale to quantify associations of time-varying BMI and WHtR with HGD/GBC risk. Results: During a median follow-up of 4.8 years, 116 of 4711 women developed HGD/GBC. Time-varying BMI was not significantly associated with HGD/GBC risk (p-overall = 0.11; p-nonlinearity = 0.20). In contrast, time-varying WHtR showed a non-linear association with HGD/GBC (p-overall = 0.02; p-nonlinearity = 0.02). Baseline WHtR and BMI models showed similar patterns of associations. Based on longitudinal WHtR trajectories among cases and lag sensitivity analyses, preclinical disease-related weight loss is unlikely to fully explain the observed associations. Conclusions: In conclusion, central obesity measured by WHtR was non-linearly associated with HGD/GBC risk in this population, suggesting that central adiposity may impact the progression from gallstones to HGD/GBC.

6 June 2026 in Archives of Public Health
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Jill KoshiolJill Koshiol
Jill Koshiol
VWVanessa Van De Wyngard
Vanessa Van De Wyngard
IAIlona Argirion
Ilona Argirion
CMClaudia Marco
Claudia Marco
MPMatías Pozo
Matías Pozo
RPRosa Paillaman
Rosa Paillaman
Background: Gallbladder cancer (GBC) is highly fatal and, unlike most cancers, is more common in women than in men. Most GBC cases have gallstones, but most people with gallstones do not develop GBC. Thus, a critical question is what drives the risk of GBC in the presence of gallstones. Methods: We designed a case–control study to complement the Chile Biliary Longitudinal Study (Chile BiLS) cohort, enriching the number of GBC cases and enhancing our ability to evaluate risk factors for GBC. Starting in July 2022, we began to recruit non-cohort prevalent (diagnosed between January 1, 2016, and July 18, 2022) and incident (diagnosed on or after July 19, 2022) GBC cases, as well as patients with high-grade dysplasia (HGD), in a high-risk area of Chile. Individuals with GBC or HGD are considered cases (HGD +). We are matching gallstone cholecystectomy patients to cases at an approximate 1:1 ratio. We also include unmatched controls (adjudicated) who were initially suspected of having cancer but had benign findings on gallbladder pathology. If a case or control is deceased, we conduct proxy interviews to maximize the potential for detailed epidemiological data collection. Through August 31, 2025, we recruited 196 prevalent and 117 incident HGD + cases. Of these cases, 189 (96%) prevalent and 108 (92%) incident cases were diagnosed with GBC. All prevalent and 98.3% of incident cases have matched controls. Participation rates are 70.8% for HGD + cases and 67.8% for matched controls. Discussion: The Chile BiLS case–control study is conducted in an area with high risk of GBC and a high proportion of people with Mapuche Amerindian ancestry. This study will provide important insights into the factors associated with GBC among people with gallstones. Here, we provide a thorough description of the design of the study, field procedures, and biological resources, as well as research opportunities, which will enable a more complete picture of the etiology of GBC by combining epidemiological, molecular, digital imaging, and clinical data. This study represents a powerful resource for the identification of new targets for cancer prevention and treatment, which are particularly needed in populations at high risk of GBC.