Gal Hochman

Dr. Gal Hochman

Department of Agriculture, Food & Resource Economics, Rutgers School of Environmental and Biological Sciences, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

16Years (2011-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 September 2018 in Energy Economics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
KDKangyin Dong
Kangyin Dong
GHGal Hochman
Gal Hochman
YZYaqing Zhang
Yaqing Zhang
RSRenjin Sun
Renjin Sun
HLHui Li
Hui Li
HLHua Liao
Hua Liao

7 June 2012 in American Journal of Agricultural Economics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
David ZilbermanDavid Zilberman
David Zilberman
GHGal Hochman
Gal Hochman
DRDeepak Rajagopal
Deepak Rajagopal
SSSteve Sexton
Steve Sexton
Govinda R. TimilsinaGovinda R. Timilsina
Govinda R. Timilsina

1 March 2014 in Trends in Biotechnology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
OLOrly Levitan
Orly Levitan
JDJorge Dinamarca
Jorge Dinamarca
GHGal Hochman
Gal Hochman
PFPaul G. Falkowski
Paul G. Falkowski

1 July 2018 in Energy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
KDKangyin Dong
Kangyin Dong
RSRenjin Sun
Renjin Sun
GHGal Hochman
Gal Hochman
HLHui Li
Hui Li

25 May 2020 in ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
GHGal Hochman
Gal Hochman
Alan GoldmanAlan Goldman
Alan Goldman
FFFrank A. Felder
Frank A. Felder
JMJames M. Mayer
James M. Mayer
AMAlexander J. M. Miller
Alexander J. M. Miller
SASaketh Aleti
Saketh Aleti

14 August 2020 in Interface Focus
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
WSWilliam John Schmelz
William John Schmelz
GHGal Hochman
Gal Hochman
KMKenneth G. Miller
Kenneth G. Miller
We model the costs of carbon capture and storage (CCS) in subsurface geological formations for emissions from 138 northeastern and midwestern electricity-generating power plants. The analysis suggests coal-sourced CO2 emissions can be stored in this region at a cost of $52–$60 ton−1, whereas the cost to store emission from natural-gas-fired plants ranges from approximately $80 to $90. Storing emissions offshore increases the lowest total costs of CCS to over $60 per ton of CO2 for coal. Because there apparently is sufficient onshore storage in the northeastern and midwestern United States, offshore storage is not necessary or economical unless there are additional costs or suitability issues associated with the onshore reservoirs. For example, if formation pressures are prohibitive in a large-scale deployment of onshore CCS, or if there is opposition to onshore storage, offshore storage space could probably store emissions at an additional cost of less than $10 ton−1. Finally, it is likely that more than 8 Gt of total CO2 emissions from this region can be stored for less $60 ton−1, slightly more than the $50 ton−1 Section 45Q tax credits incentivizing CCS.