Marine plastic waste from fisheries has emerged as a significant environmental issue, posing a significant threat to marine biodiversity and ecosystem health. The material recycling of fishing gear is an effective way to reduce waste and promote a circular economy. This study examines the characteristics of virgin and used fishing nets and ropes to understand their recyclability before they are discarded. The used nets and ropes in this study were in service for up to two years. The material characteristics were identified based on Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy while thermal properties were obtained using differential scanning calorimetry (DSC). Based on FTIR results, the main polymer of the fishing nets was found to be PE, while the fishing ropes were found to be a blend of PE/PP and a combination of PE/PP and PET. The aging and oxidation process produces new bands in the infrared (IR) spectra of PE and PP fishing nets and ropes. The significant differences between used and virgin materials were also obtained in terms of crystallization enthalpies. This suggests that the fishing nets and ropes were affected by environmental factors.

The manufacturing of products is connected to environmental impacts due to material and energy demands. One central strategy towards reducing these impacts is establishing circular material flows by reintegrating end of life products as raw materials for production processes. Sustainable manufacturing aims for raising the share of recycled material, while primary resources are only covering losses during use phase and recycling. Hence, the transition towards circular economy requires considerations of end-of-life treatment and recyclability. However, the recyclability of materials depends on several influencing factors and typically degrades over time as ageing occurs. For this purpose, assessment methods for the actual quality of available materials are required providing decision support for identification of the best recycling route. Against this background, a framework is presented for determining the recyclability of plastic materials over time, which incorporates decision criteria for up-, and down-recycling process routes and links this information with material quality and material degradation over time. Subsequently, it is shown that the recyclability of plastics is dependent on its age and that a point can be defined as EoR (End of Recyclability), which can support decision making on integrating recycled materials in manufacturing.

Abandoned, lost or otherwise discarded fishing gear (ALDFG) is a global challenge that negatively affects marine ecosystems and fishers’ livelihoods. Survey results from 1864 capture fishers in Vietnam show that the total mass of ALDFG is 82,720 kg/year, with an average loss rate of 0.24% of the total plastic used. The average ALDFG mass from gillnet fisheries is 26.0 ± 1.2 kg/vessel/year, trap fisheries 16.1 ± 2.6 kg/vessel/year, hook and line fisheries 13.8 ± 1.4 kg/vessel/year, trawl fisheries 8.8 ± 1.1 kg/vessel/year, stick-held falling net fisheries 5.1 ± 2.1 kg/vessel/year, and purse seine fisheries 4.2 ± 1.4 kg/vessel/year. Polyethylene (PE) accounts for 47.4%, polyamide (PA) 29.5% and polypropylene (PP) 17.2% of the total ALDFG mass. Results from the selected partial proportional odds model show that fishers’ concern about ALDFG increases with education, fishing experience, vessel length, and stronger awareness of environmental and economic impacts, whereas age, days at sea, perceived navigation hazards, and perceived impacts on fish stocks are negatively associated with concern; perceived tourism impacts show a statistically significant threshold-varying effect across concern levels. These findings provide a scientific basis for developing sustainable fishing-gear management policies, aiming to reduce marine plastic pollution in Vietnam. These findings provide evidence for conservation-oriented fishing-gear management in Vietnam by identifying the gear types and fisher perceptions most relevant to reducing ghost fishing, marine plastic leakage, and risks to marine biodiversity and coastal ecosystems.

Extended producer responsibility (EPR) is intended to link producer design decisions to end-of-life costs, but collective EPR schemes typically weaken this link by routing funding through producer responsibility organisations. We develop a multi-level framework of consumer-integrated environmental protection (CIEP) and argue that individual producer responsibility (IPR), where producers bear product-specific end-of-life liability, can function as a governance mechanism that reconnects design, consumer behaviour and waste governance. This paper is a qualitative multiple-case research study—not a systematic review—which draws on three funded research projects: (i) small and medium-sized enterprise (SME) tools for design-for-recyclability, (ii) an artificial intelligence (AI) application for household waste sorting, and (iii) closed-loop recycling of fishing gear in Vietnam. Within the first project (ToCoReRaM), a PRISMA-based systematic review of web-accessible circular economy tools finds that only 2 of 23 tools are SME-accessible through standard web searches. The AI-based waste-sorting application achieves approximately 75% classification accuracy under real-world conditions. The fishing gear study demonstrates technical and economic viability of closed-loop recycling, and a survey of more than 1500 Vietnamese fishers finds 95.8% willingness to return used gear given appropriate incentives. Together, the cases show that effective circular governance requires four complementary elements: IPR-based producer accountability, SME-accessible design tools, digital consumer guidance at the point of disposal, and context-sensitive governance capacity. These findings inform policy pathways for Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 12 and SDG 14.

The collective architecture of Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) assigns financial obligations to Producer Responsibility Organisations, severing the link between individual producer design decisions and end-of-life costs — eliminating the upstream design incentive that constitutes EPR's theoretical rationale for environmental management. This paper argues that Individual Producer Responsibility (IPR) — wherein end-of-life liability is assigned directly and proportionally to the originating producer — represents the regulatory precondition for a structurally coherent system of Consumer-Integrated Environmental Protection (CIEP): a four-level applied environmental management architecture (Design–Regulation–Behaviour–System) in which IPR activates recyclable product design, consumer disposal guidance, and transnational waste governance simultaneously. Three applied research projects provide convergent evidence. ToCoReRaM (Level 1) demonstrates through PRISMA-compliant systematic review and 14 SME interviews that only 2 of 23 circular economy tools are discoverably accessible in standard search behaviour, establishing that IPR creates design obligations without compliance pathways unless SME-operable tools are mandated. WERTIS-KI (Level 3) deploys AI-based image recognition achieving approximately 75% classification accuracy to bridge the attitude–behaviour gap in household waste sorting, generating product-level missorting data that IPR eco-modulation requires. REVFIN (Level 4) demonstrates closed-loop fishing gear recovery feasibility in Vietnam, introduces 'end of recyclability' as a temporally bounded material property requiring incorporation into environmental governance design, and models replicable governance transfer. Effective waste and marine litter management requires simultaneous deployment of IPR-based accountability, SME-operable tools, digital consumer guidance, and context-sensitive governance capacity — mutually reinforcing instruments constituting a minimum viable environmental management architecture directly addressing SDG 12 (responsible consumption and waste) and SDG 14 (life below water).