Dominik Wiedemann

Prof. Dr. Dominik Wiedemann

Department of Cardiac Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

18Years (2009-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 January 2013 in The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
AKAlfred Kocher
Alfred Kocher
GLGünther Laufer
Günther Laufer
AHAxel Haverich
Axel Haverich
MSMalakh Shrestha
Malakh Shrestha
TWThomas Walther
Thomas Walther
MBMichael Borger
Michael Borger

9 April 2016 in Critical Care
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Martin Hermann BernardiMartin Hermann Bernardi
Martin Hermann Bernardi
HRHarald Rinoesl
Harald Rinoesl
KDKlaus Dragosits
Klaus Dragosits
RRRobin Ristl
Robin Ristl
FHFriedrich Hoffelner
Friedrich Hoffelner
Andreas SpittlerAndreas Spittler
Andreas Spittler
Cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) surgery initiates a systemic inflammatory response, which is associated with postoperative morbidity and mortality. Hemoadsorption (HA) of cytokines may suppress inflammatory responses and improve outcomes. We tested a new sorbent used for HA (CytoSorb™; CytoSorbents Europe GmbH, Berlin, Germany) installed in the CPB circuit on changes of pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines levels, inflammation markers, and differences in patients’ perioperative course. In this first pilot trial, 37 blinded patients were undergoing elective CPB surgery at the Medical University of Vienna and were randomly assigned to HA (n = 19) or control group (n = 18). The primary outcome was differences of cytokine levels (IL-1β, IL-6, IL-18, TNF-α, and IL-10) within the first five postoperative days. We also analyzed whether we can observe any differences in ex vivo lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced TNF-α production, a reduction of high-mobility box group 1 (HMGB1), or other inflammatory markers. Additionally, measurements for fluid components, blood products, catecholamine treatment, bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA), and 30-day mortality were analyzed. We did not find differences in our primary outcome immediately following the HA treatment, although we observed differences for IL-10 24 hours after CPB (HA: median 0.3, interquartile range (IQR) 0–4.5; control: not traceable, P = 0.0347) and 48 hours after CPB (median 0, IQR 0–1.2 versus not traceable, P = 0.0185). We did not find any differences for IL-6 between both groups, and other cytokines were rarely expressed. We found differences in pretreatment levels of HMGB1 (HA: median 0, IQR 0–28.1; control: median 48.6, IQR 12.7–597.3, P = 0.02083) but no significant changes to post-treatment levels. No differences in inflammatory markers, fluid administration, blood substitution, catecholamines, BIA, or 30-day mortality were found. We did not find any reduction of the pro-inflammatory response in our patients and therefore no changes in their perioperative course. However, IL-10 showed a longer-lasting anti-inflammatory effect. The clinical impact of prolonged IL-10 needs further evaluation. We also observed strong inter-individual differences in cytokine levels; therefore, patients with an exaggerated inflammatory response to CPB need to be identified. The implementation of HA during CPB was feasible. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01879176 , registration date: June 7, 2013.

1 March 2013 in The Annals of Thoracic Surgery
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Nikolaos BonarosNikolaos Bonaros
Nikolaos Bonaros
TSThomas Schachner
Thomas Schachner
ELEric Lehr
Eric Lehr
MKMarkus Kofler
Markus Kofler
Dominik WiedemannDominik Wiedemann
Dominik Wiedemann
JBJohannes Bonatti
Johannes Bonatti

20 November 2012 in Circulation
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
KAKarin Albrecht-Schgoer
Karin Albrecht-Schgoer
WSWilfried Schgoer
Wilfried Schgoer
JHJohannes Holfeld
Johannes Holfeld
MTMarkus Theurl
Markus Theurl
Dominik WiedemannDominik Wiedemann
Dominik Wiedemann
RKRudolf Kirchmair
Rudolf Kirchmair
Background—: Secretoneurin is a neuropeptide located in nerve fibers along blood vessels, is upregulated by hypoxia, and induces angiogenesis. We tested the hypothesis that secretoneurin gene therapy exerts beneficial effects in a rat model of myocardial infarction and evaluated the mechanism of action on coronary endothelial cells. Methods and Results—: In vivo secretoneurin improved left ventricular function, inhibited remodeling, and reduced scar formation. In the infarct border zone, secretoneurin induced coronary angiogenesis, as shown by increased density of capillaries and arteries. In vitro secretoneurin induced capillary tubes, stimulated proliferation, inhibited apoptosis, and activated Akt and extracellular signal-regulated kinase in coronary endothelial cells. Effects were abrogated by a vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) antibody, and secretoneurin stimulated VEGF receptors in these cells. Secretoneurin furthermore increased binding of VEGF to endothelial cells, and binding was blocked by heparinase, indicating that secretoneurin stimulates binding of VEGF to heparan sulfate proteoglycan binding sites. Additionally, secretoneurin increased binding of VEGF to its coreceptor neuropilin-1. In endothelial cells, secretoneurin also stimulated fibroblast growth factor receptor-3 and insulin-like growth factor-1 receptor, and in coronary vascular smooth muscle cells, we observed stimulation of VEGF receptor-1 and fibroblast growth factor receptor-3. Exposure of cardiac myocytes to hypoxia and ischemic heart after myocardial infarction revealed increased secretoneurin messenger RNA and protein. Conclusions—: Our data show that secretoneurin acts as an endogenous stimulator of VEGF signaling in coronary endothelial cells by enhancing binding of VEGF to low-affinity binding sites and neuropilin-1 and stimulates further growth factor receptors like fibroblast growth factor receptor-3. Our in vivo findings indicate that secretoneurin may be a promising therapeutic tool in ischemic heart disease.

10 April 2009 in Cardiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Nikolaos BonarosNikolaos Bonaros
Nikolaos Bonaros
TSThomas Schachner
Thomas Schachner
Dominik WiedemannDominik Wiedemann
Dominik Wiedemann
AOArmin Oehlinger
Armin Oehlinger
ERElisabeth Ruetzler
Elisabeth Ruetzler
JBJohannes Bonatti
Johannes Bonatti
Objectives: Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is associated with long rehabilitation periods and slow quality of life (QOL) improvement. Totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass grafting (TECAB) can be performed using robotic technology and remote access perfusion. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether TECAB leads to accelerated QOL improvement as compared to standard CABG. Methods: We included 120 patients who had received robotically assisted CABG, 56 of whom were operated on using standard sternotomy. These patients were compared to 55 patients who underwent the TECAB procedure and to 9 TECAB patients who required conversion to conventional sternotomy. QOL evaluation was performed before the operation and 1, 3 and 6 months after the procedure using the SF-36 health survey and a standardized questionnaire. Results: All quality of life aspects improved significantly in all study patients. At 3 months, TECAB patients showed significantly better QOL scores related to bodily pain and physical health. Hospital stay and time to restoration of daily activities were significantly shorter. Converted patients experienced similar courses to sternotomy patients in terms of QOL. Conclusions: TECAB using robotic technology leads to improved physical health, shorter hospital stay and a more rapid restoration of daily activities. Conversion from TECAB to sternotomy does not lead to QOL impairment as compared to primary sternotomy.

1 May 2017 in Circulation: Heart Failure
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
MAMartin Andreas
Martin Andreas
RMRoxana Moayedifar
Roxana Moayedifar
GWGeorg Wieselthaler
Georg Wieselthaler
MWMichael Wolzt
Michael Wolzt
JRJulia Riebandt
Julia Riebandt
DZDaniel Zimpfer
Daniel Zimpfer
Background—: Left ventricular assist device–supported patients are usually anticoagulated with a combination of aspirin and vitamin K antagonists. Long-term vitamin K antagonist therapy can be complicated by unstable international normalized ratio values and patient-related compliance problems. Therefore, direct thrombin inhibitors may represent an alternative to vitamin K antagonists. Methods and Results—: Thirty HeartWare ventricular assist device patients with stable renal function were planned for this prospective, randomized, open-label, single-center study. Patients were randomized to receive either phenprocoumon or dabigatran in addition to aspirin for long-term anticoagulation. Treatment duration was scheduled for 1 year and stopped after observation of a primary end point. Dabigatran dose was 110 and 75 mg BID in patients with normal or impaired renal function (glomerular filtration rate >80 mL/min or between 80 and 30 mL/min, respectively). The study was stopped prematurely for safety reasons after 16 patients (61±8 years, 1 female) were randomized. Thromboembolic events occurred in 4 subjects receiving dabigatran (50%) and in 1 receiving phenprocoumon (13%; P =0.28). No major bleeding was recorded, and no patient died during the study. Median time to treatment termination was significantly shorter in dabigatran patients (8.5 versus 12.0 months; P =0.015). Conclusions—: Thromboembolic events on dabigatran led to early termination of a randomized controlled trial of dabigatran versus phenprocoumon in left ventricular assist device patients. Clinical Trial Registration—: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT02872649.