Diego Kassuha

Dr. Diego Kassuha

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

1Year (2026-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
28 April 2026 in Sustainability
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ACabrahan erasmo apaza canqui
abrahan erasmo apaza canqui
DKDiego Kassuha
Diego Kassuha
WILLIAMS SERGIO ALMANZA QUISPEWILLIAMS SERGIO ALMANZA QUISPE
WILLIAMS SERGIO ALMANZA QUISPE
MRMaría Elena Rodrigo Rojas
María Elena Rodrigo Rojas
NGNataniel Linares Gutiérrez
Nataniel Linares Gutiérrez
LALUIS FORTUNATO FORTUNATO MORALES ARANIBAR
LUIS FORTUNATO FORTUNATO MORALES ARANIBAR
Potentially toxic elements (PTEs) in mining-impacted wetlands can transfer from soil and water to forage and grazing livestock, resulting in dietary exposure for nearby communities. In this study, arsenic (As), lead (Pb), and cadmium (Cd) were quantified in key environmental matrices (soil, surface water, and forage) and in sheep tissues (liver, kidney, and muscle) from six georeferenced grazing sites in the Ite coastal wetland (Tacna, Peru) during the dry season. Samples were acid-digested following U.S. EPA protocols and analyzed by atomic absorption spectrometry (AAS) under QA/QC procedures (certified reference materials, blanks, duplicates, and matrix spikes); matrix-specific detection and quantification limits are reported. Arsenic dominated the contamination profile (forage: 428.6 mg kg−1, dry weight; soil: 48.61 mg kg−1; water: 0.97 mg L−1) and was detected in sheep tissues (kidney: 0.1577 mg kg−1; muscle: 0.1538 mg kg−1; liver: 0.0644 mg kg−1). Lead and cadmium were <LOQ in muscle and liver but were measurable in kidney (Pb: 0.0415 mg kg−1; Cd: 0.0011 mg kg−1). To support the interpretation of trophic transfer, screening transfer/bioaccumulation metrics (soil-to-forage, forage-to-tissue, and water-to-tissue) were calculated. Human dietary exposure was screened using estimated daily intake (EDI), hazard quotient (HQ), and margin of exposure (MOE). Because arsenic speciation was not measured, inorganic arsenic (iAs) risk was evaluated as a conservative upper bound (100% iAs) and through sensitivity scenarios (10–50% iAs). Under a high-meat-consumption scenario (300 g day−1), the upper-bound assumption yielded HQ = 2.2 and MOE = 0.46; however, scenario analyses indicate that risk conclusions are highly dependent on the assumed iAs fraction. Overall, the results identify arsenic as a priority contaminant and support targeted grazing management, the provision of low-arsenic water sources, and remediation and monitoring actions to reduce exposure in vulnerable rural communities.