Yousef Abbaspour-Gilandeh

Dr. Yousef Abbaspour-Gilandeh

University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Ardabil, Iran
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

19Years (2008-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 September 2018 in Information Processing in Agriculture
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Mohammad KavehMohammad Kaveh
Mohammad Kaveh
Vali Rasooli SharabianiVali Rasooli Sharabiani
Vali Rasooli Sharabiani
RCReza Amiri Chayjan
Reza Amiri Chayjan
ETEbrahim Taghinezhad
Ebrahim Taghinezhad
Yousef Abbaspour-GilandehYousef Abbaspour-Gilandeh
Yousef Abbaspour-Gilandeh
IGIman Golpour
Iman Golpour

1 June 2018 in Computers in Industry
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SSsajad sabzi
sajad sabzi
Yousef Abbaspour-GilandehYousef Abbaspour-Gilandeh
Yousef Abbaspour-Gilandeh
GGGinés García-Mateos
Ginés García-Mateos

12 December 2019 in Food Science & Nutrition
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Yousef Abbaspour-GilandehYousef Abbaspour-Gilandeh
Yousef Abbaspour-Gilandeh
Ahmad JahanbakhshiAhmad Jahanbakhshi
Ahmad Jahanbakhshi
Mohammad KavehMohammad Kaveh
Mohammad Kaveh
This study aimed to predict the drying kinetics, energy utilization (Eu), energy utilization ratio (EUR), exergy loss, and exergy efficiency of quince slice in a hot air (HA) dryer using artificial neural networks and ANFIS. The experiments were performed at air temperatures of 50, 60, and 70°C and air velocities of 0.6, 1.2, and 1.8 m/s. The thermal parameters were determined using thermodynamic relations. Increasing air temperature and air velocity increased the effective moisture diffusivity (Deff), Eu, EUR, exergy efficiency, and exergy loss. The value of the Deff was varied from 4.19 × 10–10 to 1.18 × 10–9 m2/s. The highest value Eu, EUR, and exergy loss and exergy efficiency were calculated 0.0694 kJ/s, 0.882, 0.044 kJ/s, and 0.879, respectively. Midilli et al. model, ANNs, and ANFIS model, with a determination coefficient (R2) of .9992, .9993, and .9997, provided the best performance for predicting the moisture ratio of quince fruit. Also, the ANFIS model, in comparison with the artificial neural networks model, was better able to predict Eu, EUR, exergy efficiency, and exergy loss, with R2 of .9989, .9988, .9986, and .9978, respectively.

19 September 2018 in Journal of Food Process Engineering
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Mohammad KavehMohammad Kaveh
Mohammad Kaveh
Ahmad JahanbakhshiAhmad Jahanbakhshi
Ahmad Jahanbakhshi
Yousef Abbaspour-GilandehYousef Abbaspour-Gilandeh
Yousef Abbaspour-Gilandeh
Ebrahim TaghinezhadEbrahim Taghinezhad
Ebrahim Taghinezhad
MMMohammad Bagher Farshbaf Moghimi
Mohammad Bagher Farshbaf Moghimi

4 May 2021 in Foods
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Yousef Abbaspour-GilandehYousef Abbaspour-Gilandeh
Yousef Abbaspour-Gilandeh
Mohammad KavehMohammad Kaveh
Mohammad Kaveh
HFhamideh fatemi
hamideh fatemi
Muhammad AzizMuhammad Aziz
Muhammad Aziz
The present study aimed to examine the effect of ultrasonic pretreatment and hot air, microwave–hot-air, infrared–hot air, and freeze-drying on the drying time, specific energy (SE), qualitative properties (i.e., color, shrinkage, and rehydration ratio), and bioactive compounds’ properties (i.e., antioxidant activity, phenolic, and flavonoid contents) of hawthorn fruit. Drying of hawthorn was conducted from 45 min for the ultrasonic + microwave–hot-air drying to 1280 min for the freeze-drying method. The lowest amount of SE was obtained using the ultrasonic-microwave–hot-air drying method, which was 47.57 MJ/kg. The lowest values in color changes (12.25) and shrinkage (17.21%) were recorded for the freeze-drying method, while the highest amounts for these traits were 45.57% and 66.75% in the HA drying, respectively. In general, the use of different drying methods reduces the antioxidant capacity (AC), total phenolic content (TPC), and total flavonoid content (TFC) during processing compared to fresh samples. The highest values for AC, TPC, TFC, and the rehydration ratio were 30.69%, 73.07 mg-GAE/gdw, 65.93 mg-QE/gdw, and 2.02 for the freeze-drying method, respectively.

1 September 2019 in Journal of Food Processing and Preservation
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Yousef Abbaspour-GilandehYousef Abbaspour-Gilandeh
Yousef Abbaspour-Gilandeh
Mohammad KavehMohammad Kaveh
Mohammad Kaveh
Ahmad JahanbakhshiAhmad Jahanbakhshi
Ahmad Jahanbakhshi