Two different drying methods were applied for dehydration of apple, i.e., convective drying (CD) and microwave drying (MD). The process of convective drying through divergent temperatures; 50, 60 and 70 °C at 1.0 m/s air velocity and three different levels of microwave power (90, 180, and 360 W) were studied. In the analysis of the performance of our approach on moisture ratio (MR) of apple slices, artificial neural networks (ANNs) was used to provide with a background for further discussion and evaluation. In order to evaluate the models mentioned in the literature, the Midilli et al. model was proper for dehydrating of apple slices in both MD and CD. The MD drying technology enhanced the drying rate when compared with CD drying significantly. Effective diffusivity (D_eff) of moisture in CD drying (1.95 × 10⁻⁷–4.09 × 10⁻⁷ m²/s) was found to be lower than that observed in MD (2.94 × 10⁻⁷–8.21 × 10⁻⁷ m²/s). The activation energy (Ea) values of CD drying and MD drying were 122.28–125 kJ/mol and 14.01–15.03 W/g respectively. The MD had the lowest specific energy consumption (SEC) as compared to CD drying methods. According to ANN results, the best R² values for prediction of MR in CD and MD were 0.9993 and 0.9991, respectively.

In this study, the possibility of non-destructive detection of tomato pesticide residues was investigated using Vis/NIRS and prediction models such as PLSR and ANN. First, Vis/NIR spectral data from 180 samples of non-pesticide tomatoes (used as a control treatment) and samples impregnated with pesticide with a concentration of 2 L per 1000 L between 350–1100 nm were recorded by a spectroradiometer. Then, they were divided into two parts: Calibration data (70%) and prediction data (30%). Next, the prediction performance of PLSR and ANN models after processing was compared with 10 spectral preprocessing methods. Spectral data obtained from spectroscopy were used as input and pesticide values obtained by gas chromatography method were used as output data. Data dimension reduction methods (principal component analysis (PCA), Random frog (RF), and Successive prediction algorithm (SPA)) were used to select the number of main variables. According to the values obtained for root-mean-square error (RMSE) and correlation coefficient (R) of the calibration and prediction data, it was found that the combined model SPA-ANN has the best performance (RC = 0.988, RP = 0.982, RMSEC = 0.141, RMSEP = 0.166). The investigational consequences obtained can be a reference for the development of internal content of agricultural products, based on NIR spectroscopy.

The purpose of this work was to investigate the detection of the pesticide residual (profenofos) in tomatoes by using visible/near-infrared spectroscopy. Therefore, the experiments were performed on 180 tomato samples with different percentages of profenofos pesticide (higher and lower values than the maximum residual limit (MRL)) as compared to the control (no pesticide). VIS/near infrared (NIR) spectral data from pesticide solution and non-pesticide tomato samples (used as control treatment) impregnated with different concentrations of pesticide in the range of 400 to 1050 nm were recorded by a spectrometer. For classification of tomatoes with pesticide content at lower and higher levels of MRL as healthy and unhealthy samples, we used different spectral pre-processing methods with partial least squares discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) models. The Smoothing Moving Average pre-processing method with the standard error of cross validation (SECV) = 4.2767 was selected as the best model for this study. In addition, in the calibration and prediction sets, the percentages of total correctly classified samples were 90 and 91.66%, respectively. Therefore, it can be concluded that reflective spectroscopy (VIS/NIR) can be used as a non-destructive, low-cost, and rapid technique to control the health of tomatoes impregnated with profenofos pesticide.

Visible–near‐infrared spectroscopy is known for its rapid and nondestructive characteristics designed to predict leaf chlorophyll content (LCC) of winter wheat. It is believed that the nonlinear technique is preferable to the linear method. The canopy reflectance was applied to generate the LCC prediction model. To accomplish such an objective, artificial neural networks (ANN), along with partial least squares regression (PLSR), nonlinear, and linear evaluation methods have been employed and evaluated to predict wheat LCC. The wheat leaves reflectance spectra were initially preprocessed using Savitzky–Golay smoothing, differentiation (first derivative), SNV (Standard Normal Variate), MSC (Multiplicative Scatter Correction), and their combinations. Afterward, a model for LCC using the reflectance spectra was developed by means of the PLS and ANN. The vis/NIR spectroscopy samples at the 350–1400 nm wavelength were preprocessed using S. Golay smoothing, D₁, SNV, and MSC. The preprocessing with SNV‐S.G, followed by PLS and ANN modeling, was able to achieve the most accurate prediction, with the correlation coefficient of 0.92 and 0.97, along with the root mean square error of 0.9131 and 0.7305 receptivity. The experimental findings also revealed that the suggested method utilizing the PLS and ANN model with SNV‐S. G preprocessing was practically feasible to estimate the chlorophyll content of a particular winter wheat leaf area according to the visible and near‐infrared spectroscopy sensors, achieving improved precision and accuracy. The nonlinear technique was proposed as a more refined technique for LCC estimating.