To accomplish the current climate goals of the federal republic of Germany, energy efficiency within the building and automotive sector must improve considerably. One possible way to reduce the high amount of energy required for heating, ventilation, and air-conditioning (HVAC) is the introduction of personal climatization systems in combination with the extension of the standardized room air temperature range. Personal systems allow improvements of climatic conditions (heating, cooling, and air quality) within sub-areas of the room instead of conditioning an entire room air volume. In this regard, personal systems are perfectly suitable for locations with local air-conditioning focal points, such as open-plan offices and vehicle cabins, where they substantially improve the energy efficiency of the entire system. This work aims to summarize previously conducted research in the area of personal climatization systems. The investigated local thermal actuators comprise fans for the generation of air movement, ventilators for the improvement of the air quality within the respiratory area of persons, water-conditioned panels for the climatization of persons via longwave radiation and conduction, radiant heaters, and combinations of the systems. Personal systems are superior to mixing ventilation regarding the improvement of the perceived air quality and thermal comfort. Furthermore, the introduced overview shows that personal climatization systems are generally more energy-efficient than conventional air-conditioning and facilitates the extension of the indoor air temperature corridor of the HVAC. Table fans and climatized seats are highly effective in connection with the improvement of personal thermal comfort. The performance of the overwhelming majority of applied personal environmental control systems is user-controlled or depends on a predefined load profile, which is generally defined person independent. Single studies reveal that effectively controlled automated systems have a similar thermal impact on a user’s thermal comfort as user-controlled ones. The implementation of an automated control system is feasible by using novel approaches such as the so-called human-centered closed loop control-platform (HCCLC-platform). The latter contains a central data server which allows asynchronous, bi-directional communication between multi-modal sensor data, user feedback systems, thermal actuators and numerical calculation models used to assess the individual thermal comfort of a person. This enables a continuous and holistic reflection of the thermal situation inside a room and the estimation of the corresponding impact on an individual’s thermal comfort. Considering the measured and simulated thermal state of a single person, the described system is capable of determining body-part-specific energy requirements that are needed to keep the overall thermal comfort level of an individual person on a high level.

This paper introduces the equivalent contact temperature (ECT) model for local thermal comfort assessment in contact areas for non-uniform environmental conditions. It aims to complete the comfort evaluation scheme of the equivalent temperature approach included in ISO 14505-2 by the contact areas back and buttocks that are currently neglected in the standard. For the assessment of local and overall thermal comfort of seated persons, these contact areas are of great importance, especially if exposed to personal comfort systems. Person-oriented climatization systems, such as seat heating and ventilation, are much more energy efficient than conventional HVAC systems and allow to incorporate the human individual into the system's control loop. The ECT-approach is formally defined, analytically as well as mathematically derived and validated by a subject study. The results of the subject study (air temperature of 26 °C and 29 °C) confirm the cooling effect due to the seat ventilation and show fundamental correlations between ECTs and body part specific mean thermal votes for buttocks and back.

This article revisits the Equivalent Contact Temperature (ECT) model by incorporating winter scenarios with seat heating, which were unaddressed in previous studies. The research focuses on enhancing the model's accuracy in evaluating thermal comfort for seated individuals under non-uniform conditions, particularly for the buttocks and back. These contact areas are crucial for both local and overall comfort, especially with Personalised Environmental Control Systems (PECS), like seat heating and ventilation, which operate close to the body. PECS are more energy efficient than traditional HVAC systems, offering customisation to individual comfort preferences while enhancing individual thermal comfort and energy efficiency in buildings and vehicles. A participant study at air temperatures of 17 °C and 18 °C validated the ECT approach, confirming the effectiveness of seat heating and revealing key correlations between ECT values and thermal comfort ratings. Additionally, an equivalent skin temperature and a comfort evaluation scheme for winter conditions were introduced.