Main conclusion: Some salt stress response mechanisms can translate into sorghum forage yield and thus act as targets for genetic improvement. Sorghum is a drought-tolerant cereal that is widely grown in the vast Africa’s arid and semi-arid areas. Apart from drought, salinity is a major abiotic factor that, in addition to natural causes, has been exacerbated by increased poor anthropological activities. The importance of sorghum as a forage crop in saline areas has yet to be fully realized. Despite intraspecific variation in salt tolerance, sorghum is generally moderately salt-tolerant, and its productivity in saline soils can be remarkably limited. This is due to the difficulty of replicating optimal field saline conditions due to the great heterogeneity of salt distribution in the soil. As a promising fodder crop for saline areas, classic phenotype-based selection methods can be integrated with modern -omics in breeding programs to simultaneously address salt tolerance and production. To enable future manipulation, selection, and genetic improvement of sorghum with high yield and salt tolerance, here, we explore the potential positive correlations between the reliable indices of sorghum performance under salt stress at the phenotypic and genotypic level. We then explore the potential role of modern selection and genetic improvement programs in incorporating these linked salt tolerance and yield traits and propose a mechanism for future studies.

In water-scarce regions, high yield and improved water use efficiency (WUE) of crops can be obtained if water and nitrogen (N) are properly applied. While water and N have been the subject of research worldwide, studies are needed to advance our understanding on the complexity of their interaction. A field experiment was conducted at the University of Wyoming Powell Research and Extension Center in 2014 and 2015 growing seasons to determine the effect of irrigation water and N on growth, dry matter (DM) yield, and WUE of silage corn (Zea mays L.) grown under on-surface drip irrigation (ODI). The experiment was laid out as a randomized complete block design in split-plot arrangement with three replications. Irrigation was the main treatment and included 100ETc (100% crop evapotranspiration), 80ETc, and 60ETc. Nitrogen was the sub-treatment and included 0, 90, 180, 270, and 360 kg N ha⁻¹ as urea-ammonium-nitrate solution Results showed that irrigation water, N, and application timing significantly affected growth and DM yield, especially at late vegetative and mid reproductive growth stages. At harvest (R4), no significant difference was observed between 180 kg N ha⁻¹ and 270 kg N ha⁻¹ on DM yield and WUE. However, significant differences of DM yield were observed between irrigation treatments, and 100ETc and 80ETc did not differ in WUE. Our findings suggest that 100ETc and 180 kg N ha⁻¹ is the best combination for high yielding corn for silage grown in a semi-arid climate under ODI.

Cover crops improve soil health and environmental quality by enhancing soil organic carbon (SOC) sequestration and nutrient cycling in agroecosystems. This study evaluated the effect of cover crops on soil CO₂–C emissions, temperature, and water content during cover crop growth from April to October, 2017 and 2018. Treatments included fallow, pea (Pisum sativum L.), oat (Avena sativa L.), canola (Brassica napus L.), pea–oat (POmix), pea–canola (PCmix), pea–oat–canola (POCmix), and POC–hairy vetch (Vicia villosa L.)–forage radish (Raphanus sativus L.)–barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) (six species mixture; SSmix). The CO₂–C emissions were monitored weekly from April to October each year using a portable infrared‐gas analyzer. Seasonal changes in CO₂–C emissions varied with cover crops and peaked as soil temperature and water content following precipitation events. Average CO₂–C emissions across sampling dates was 46–70% greater under pea than under fallow, canola, and POmix in 2017, but not different among cover crops in 2018. Although the emissions were higher than fallow, canola and POmix plots had lower CO₂–C emissions than other cover crops. Pea as sole cover crop or in mixtures (PCmix, POCmix, SSmix) increased CO₂–C emissions and microbial activity whereas canola and POmix mixture reduced the emissions during the period with higher precipitation.

Soil salinity limits crop productivity in arid regions and it can be alleviated by crop synergies. A multivariate analysis of published data (n = 78) from arid and semiarid habitats across continents was conducted to determine the crop species mechanisms of salinity tolerance and synergies relevant for designing adapted forage cropping systems. Halophyte [Cynodon plectostachus (K. Schum.) Pilg.] and non-halophyte grasses (Lolium perenne L. and Panicum maximum Jacq.) clustered along increasing soil salinity. Halophytic grasses [Panicum antidotale Retz. and Dicanthum annulatum (Forssk.) Stapf] congregated with Medicago sativa L., a non-halophytic legume along a gradient of increasing photosynthesis. Halophytic grasses [Sporobolus spicatus (Vahl) Kunth, and Cynodon plectostachyus (K. Schum.) Pilg.] had strong yield-salinity correlations. Medicago sativa L. and Leptochloa fusca L. Kunth were ubiquitous in their forage biomass production along a continuum of medium to high salinity. Forage crude protein was strongly correlated with increasing salinity in halophytic grasses and non-halophytic legumes. Halophytes were identified with mechanisms to neutralize the soil sodium accumulation and forage productivity along an increasing salinity. Overall, halophytes-non-halophytes, grass-forbs, annual-perennials, and plant-bacteria-fungi synergies were identified which can potentially form cropping systems that can ameliorate saline soils and sustain forage productivity in salt-affected arid regions.