Cristina Lupu

Cristina Lupu


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

16Years (2011-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
17 May 2020 in Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
HHHans Hersbach
Hans Hersbach
BBBill Bell
Bill Bell
PBPaul Berrisford
Paul Berrisford
SHShoji Hirahara
Shoji Hirahara
AHAndrás Horányi
András Horányi
JTJean‐Noël Thépaut
Jean‐Noël Thépaut
Within the Copernicus Climate Change Service (C3S), ECMWF is producing the ERA5 reanalysis which, once completed, will embody a detailed record of the global atmosphere, land surface and ocean waves from 1950 onwards. This new reanalysis replaces the ERA‐Interim reanalysis (spanning 1979 onwards) which was started in 2006. ERA5 is based on the Integrated Forecasting System (IFS) Cy41r2 which was operational in 2016. ERA5 thus benefits from a decade of developments in model physics, core dynamics and data assimilation. In addition to a significantly enhanced horizontal resolution of 31 km, compared to 80 km for ERA‐Interim, ERA5 has hourly output throughout, and an uncertainty estimate from an ensemble (3‐hourly at half the horizontal resolution). This paper describes the general set‐up of ERA5, as well as a basic evaluation of characteristics and performance, with a focus on the dataset from 1979 onwards which is currently publicly available. Re‐forecasts from ERA5 analyses show a gain of up to one day in skill with respect to ERA‐Interim. Comparison with radiosonde and PILOT data prior to assimilation shows an improved fit for temperature, wind and humidity in the troposphere, but not the stratosphere. A comparison with independent buoy data shows a much improved fit for ocean wave height. The uncertainty estimate reflects the evolution of the observing systems used in ERA5. The enhanced temporal and spatial resolution allows for a detailed evolution of weather systems. For precipitation, global‐mean correlation with monthly‐mean GPCP data is increased from 67% to 77%. In general, low‐frequency variability is found to be well represented and from 10 hPa downwards general patterns of anomalies in temperature match those from the ERA‐Interim, MERRA‐2 and JRA‐55 reanalyses.

10 July 2018 in Geoscientific Model Development
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
RSRoger Saunders
Roger Saunders
JHJames Hocking
James Hocking
ETEmma Turner
Emma Turner
PRPeter Rayer
Peter Rayer
DRDavid Rundle
David Rundle
CLCristina Lupu
Cristina Lupu
This paper gives an update of the RTTOV (Radiative Transfer for TOVS) fast radiative transfer model, which is widely used in the satellite retrieval and data assimilation communities. RTTOV is a fast radiative transfer model for simulating top-of-atmosphere radiances from passive visible, infrared and microwave downward-viewing satellite radiometers. In addition to the forward model, it also optionally computes the tangent linear, adjoint and Jacobian matrix providing changes in radiances for profile variable perturbations assuming a linear relationship about a given atmospheric state. This makes it a useful tool for developing physical retrievals from satellite radiances, for direct radiance assimilation in NWP models, for simulating future instruments, and for training or teaching with a graphical user interface. An overview of the RTTOV model is given, highlighting the updates and increased capability of the latest versions, and it gives some examples of its current performance when compared with more accurate line-by-line radiative transfer models and a few selected observations. The improvement over the original version of the model released in 1999 is demonstrated.

1 October 2017 in Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
AGA. J. Geer
A. J. Geer
FBF. Baordo
F. Baordo
NBN. Bormann
N. Bormann
PCP. Chambon
P. Chambon
SES. J. English
S. J. English
CLCristina Lupu
Cristina Lupu

14 December 2018 in Remote Sensing
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Gianpaolo BalsamoGianpaolo Balsamo
Gianpaolo Balsamo
AAAnna Agusti-Panareda
Anna Agusti-Panareda
Clement AlbergelClement Albergel
Clement Albergel
GAGabriele Arduini
Gabriele Arduini
ABAnton Beljaars
Anton Beljaars
Xubin ZengXubin Zeng
Xubin Zeng
In this paper, we review the use of satellite-based remote sensing in combination with in situ data to inform Earth surface modelling. This involves verification and optimization methods that can handle both random and systematic errors and result in effective model improvement for both surface monitoring and prediction applications. The reasons for diverse remote sensing data and products include (i) their complementary areal and temporal coverage, (ii) their diverse and covariant information content, and (iii) their ability to complement in situ observations, which are often sparse and only locally representative. To improve our understanding of the complex behavior of the Earth system at the surface and sub-surface, we need large volumes of data from high-resolution modelling and remote sensing, since the Earth surface exhibits a high degree of heterogeneity and discontinuities in space and time. The spatial and temporal variability of the biosphere, hydrosphere, cryosphere and anthroposphere calls for an increased use of Earth observation (EO) data attaining volumes previously considered prohibitive. We review data availability and discuss recent examples where satellite remote sensing is used to infer observable surface quantities directly or indirectly, with particular emphasis on key parameters necessary for weather and climate prediction. Coordinated high-resolution remote-sensing and modelling/assimilation capabilities for the Earth surface are required to support an international application-focused effort.

1 October 2017 in Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
REReima Eresmaa
Reima Eresmaa
JLJulie Letertre‐Danczak
Julie Letertre‐Danczak
CLCristina Lupu
Cristina Lupu
NBNiels Bormann
Niels Bormann
AMAnthony P. McNally
Anthony P. McNally

1 March 2011 in Monthly Weather Review
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CLCristina Lupu
Cristina Lupu
PGPierre Gauthier
Pierre Gauthier
SLStéphane Laroche
Stéphane Laroche
The degrees of freedom for signal (DFS) is used in data assimilation applications to measure the self-sensitivity of analysis to different observation types. This paper describes a practical method to estimate the DFS of observations from a posteriori statistics. The method does not require the consistency of the error statistics in the analysis system and it is shown that the observational impact on analyses can be estimated from observation departures with respect to analysis or the forecast. This method is first introduced to investigate the impact of a complete set, or subsets, of observations on the analysis for idealized one-dimensional variational data assimilation (1D-Var) analysis experiments and then applied in the framework of the three dimensional (3D)- and four-dimensional (4D)-Var schemes developed at Environment Canada.