Anna Sieber

Ms. Anna Sieber


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

2Years (2025-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
9 January 2025 in Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ASAnna Sieber
Anna Sieber
SSSabine Spiess
Sabine Spiess
WRWadih Y. Rassy
Wadih Y. Rassy
DSDominik Schild
Dominik Schild
TRThomas Rieß
Thomas Rieß
GGGeorg M. Guebitz
Georg M. Guebitz
The number of metal-containing waste streams resulting from electronic end-of life products, metallurgical by-products, and mine tailings to name but a few, is increasing worldwide. In recent decades, the potential to exploit these waste streams as valuable secondary resources to meet the high demand of critical and economically important raw materials has become more prominent. In this review, fundamental principles of bio-based metal recovery technologies are discussed focusing on microbial metabolism-dependent and metabolism-independent mechanisms as sustainable alternatives to conventional chemical metal recovery methods. In contrast to previous reviews which have partially addressed this topic, a special focus will be given on how fundamental principles of bio-based recovery technologies can influence the selectivity and specificity of metal recovery. While conventional methods for metal recovery show benefits in terms of economic affordability, bio-based recovery technologies offer advantages in terms of efficiency and environmentally friendliness. Modifications and adaptations in the processes of biosorption, bioaccumulation and bioelectrochemical systems are highlighted, further emphasizing the application of metal-binding peptides and siderophores to increase selectivity in the recovery of metals. Single metal solutions or mixtures with a low complexity have been the focus of previous studies and reviews, but this does not reflect the nature of complex industrial effluents. Therefore, key challenges that arise when dealing with complex polymetallic solutions are addressed and the focus is set on optimizing bio-based technologies to recover metals efficiently and selectively from bio-leachates or liquid waste streams.

23 September 2025 in Waste Management
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
ASAnna Sieber
Anna Sieber
AKAnastasia Kalampaka
Anastasia Kalampaka
SMSabine Matys
Sabine Matys
FLFranziska L. Lederer
Franziska L. Lederer
Klemens KremserKlemens Kremser
Klemens Kremser
GGGeorg Guebitz
Georg Guebitz
Electronic waste is a valuable source of critical metals like nickel and cobalt, but their recovery is challenging. Current recycling processes use harsh conditions and toxic chemicals, which is why environmentally friendly alternatives are crucial. Metal-binding peptides offer high selectivity and durability, making them promising for sustainable metal separation. Here, phage display was successfully applied to screen a combinatorial peptide library with specific affinities to nickel or cobalt. Identified peptides with the amino acid sequences FWPLHHH, GPHKHHA, HNYHHRH, and HMNHHHH revealed improved binding affinities of up to 20.000-fold to immobilized metal ions compared to the unspecific binding of the phage backbone. Furthermore, low micromolar dissociation constants e.g., 6.2 µM for peptide Co_02 (HMNHHHH) to Co2+ and 29.0 µM for peptide Ni_01 (GPHKHHA) to Ni2+, determined by Isothermal Titration Calorimetry (ITC) measurements confirmed the intrinsic metal binding properties. These peptides offer a high potential for future recycling of nickel and cobalt from mixed metal waste like batteries.

7 August 2026 in Recycling
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
PSParinaz Seifollahzadeh
Parinaz Seifollahzadeh
BRBettina Rutrecht
Bettina Rutrecht
Stefanie LesiakStefanie Lesiak
Stefanie Lesiak
LLLalropuia Lalropuia
Lalropuia Lalropuia
SSStephan Stuhr
Stephan Stuhr
Roland PombergerRoland Pomberger
Roland Pomberger
Recycling of lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) remains challenging due to high energy requirements, losses of key elements like lithium, and the heterogeneity of waste streams arising from different cathode chemistries. This study evaluates multiple recycling methods for LIBs black mass (BM), to recover critical raw materials and other valuable components. Three types of BM including nickel–manganese–cobalt (NMC), lithium iron phosphate (LFP) and a heterogeneous mixture of cell phones and laptops (HL; German: Handy/Laptops), were treated using froth flotation, pyrometallurgy, and biohydrometallurgy and their respective recovery efficiencies were assessed. The flotation results revealed that the HL sample had the lowest mis-recovery of non-ferrous metals into the froth product (around 10%), leading to further flotation only for HL. During screening, 94–99% of iron, phosphorus, and carbon in LFP-type BM were recovered in the fine fraction (<45 µm), while 92–99% of lithium, cobalt, manganese, nickel, and carbon in NMC-type BM were recovered in the same fraction. During precipitation, 99% of iron and 100% of phosphorus were recovered from LFP bioleachates at pH 3, while ~97–100% of dissolved cobalt, manganese, and nickel were recovered from NMC bioleachates. These findings confirm that no single recycling method is optimal for all battery chemistries.