Yuancheng Ryan Lu

Yuancheng Ryan Lu


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

13Years (2014-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
2 December 2020 in Nature
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
YLYuancheng Ryan Lu
Yuancheng Ryan Lu
BBBenedikt Brommer
Benedikt Brommer
XTXiao Tian
Xiao Tian
AKAnitha Krishnan
Anitha Krishnan
MMMargarita Meer
Margarita Meer
DSDavid A. Sinclair
David A. Sinclair

1 March 2018 in Cell
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Abhirup DasAbhirup Das
Abhirup Das
GHGeorge X. Huang
George X. Huang
MBMichael S. Bonkowski
Michael S. Bonkowski
ALAlban Longchamp
Alban Longchamp
CLCatherine Li
Catherine Li
DSDavid A. Sinclair
David A. Sinclair

15 December 2023 in Nature Aging
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
YLYuancheng Ryan Lu
Yuancheng Ryan Lu
XTXiao Tian
Xiao Tian
DSDavid A. Sinclair
David A. Sinclair

28 November 2024 in PNAS Nexus
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
VGVadim N Gladyshev
Vadim N Gladyshev
BABenjamin Anderson
Benjamin Anderson
HBHanna Barlit
Hanna Barlit
BBBenjamin Barré
Benjamin Barré
SBSamuel Beck
Samuel Beck
AZAlex Zhavoronkov
Alex Zhavoronkov
To gain insight into how researchers of aging perceive the process they study, we conducted a survey among experts in the field. While highlighting some common features of aging, the survey exposed broad disagreement on the foundational issues. What is aging? What causes it? When does it begin? What constitutes rejuvenation? Not only was there no consensus on these and other core questions, but none of the questions received a majority opinion—even regarding the need for consensus itself. Despite many researchers believing they understand aging, their understanding diverges considerably. Importantly, as different processes are labeled as “aging” by researchers, different experimental approaches are prioritized. The survey shed light on the need to better define which aging processes this field should target and what its goals are. It also allowed us to categorize contemporary views on aging and rejuvenation, revealing critical, yet largely unanswered, questions that appear disconnected from the current research focus. Finally, we discuss ways to address the disagreement, which we hope will ultimately aid progress in the field.

1 December 2023 in Cellular Reprogramming
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MKMargarete M. Karg
Margarete M. Karg
YLYuancheng Ryan Lu
Yuancheng Ryan Lu
NRNasrin Refaian
Nasrin Refaian
JCJames Cameron
James Cameron
EHEmma Hoffmann
Emma Hoffmann
BKBruce R. Ksander
Bruce R. Ksander
Glaucoma, a chronic neurodegenerative disease, is a leading cause of age-related blindness worldwide and characterized by the progressive loss of retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) and their axons. Previously, we developed a novel epigenetic rejuvenation therapy, based on the expression of the three transcription factors Oct4, Sox2, and Klf4 (OSK), which safely rejuvenates RGCs without altering cell identity in glaucomatous and old mice after 1 month of treatment. In the current year-long study, mice with continuous or cyclic OSK expression induced after glaucoma-induced vision damage had occurred were tracked for efficacy, duration, and safety. Surprisingly, only 2 months of OSK fully restored impaired vision, with a restoration of vision for 11 months with prolonged expression. In RGCs, transcription from the doxycycline (DOX)-inducible Tet-On AAV system, returned to baseline 4 weeks after DOX withdrawal. Significant vision improvements remained for 1 month post switching off OSK, after which the vision benefit gradually diminished but remained better than baseline. Notably, no adverse effects on retinal structure or body weight were observed in glaucomatous mice with OSK continuously expressed for 21 months providing compelling evidence of efficacy and safety. This work highlights the tremendous therapeutic potential of rejuvenating gene therapies using OSK, not only for glaucoma but also for other ocular and systemic injuries and age-related diseases.

10 June 2025 in Nature Communications
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SLSonglei Liu
Songlei Liu
LLLi Li
Li Li
FZFan Zhang
Fan Zhang
MGMariana Garcia-Corral
Mariana Garcia-Corral
KMKatharina Meyer
Katharina Meyer
GCGeorge Church
George Church
Differentiation of induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) into specialized cell types is essential for uncovering cell-type specific molecular mechanisms and interrogating cellular function. Transcription factor screens have enabled efficient production of a few cell types; however, engineering cell types that require complex transcription factor combinations remains challenging. Here, we report an iterative, high-throughput single-cell transcription factor screening method that enables the identification of transcription factor combinations for specialized cell differentiation, which we validated by differentiating human microglia-like cells. We found that the expression of six transcription factors, SPI1, CEBPA, FLI1, MEF2C, CEBPB, and IRF8, is sufficient to differentiate human iPSC into cells with transcriptional and functional similarity to primary human microglia within 4 days. Through this screening method, we also describe a novel computational method allowing the exploration of single-cell RNA sequencing data derived from transcription factor perturbation assays to construct causal gene regulatory networks for future cell fate engineering.