Cameron Clark

Prof. Cameron Clark

University of Sydney
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

22Years (2005-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 June 2021 in Computers and Electronics in Agriculture
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
YQYongliang Qiao
Yongliang Qiao
HKHe Kong
He Kong
CCCameron Clark
Cameron Clark
SLSabrina Lomax
Sabrina Lomax
DSDaobilige Su
Daobilige Su
SSSalah Sukkarieh
Salah Sukkarieh

1 April 2007 in Livestock Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
WFW.J. Fulkerson
W.J. Fulkerson
JNJ.S. Neal
J.S. Neal
CCCameron Clark
Cameron Clark
AHA. Horadagoda
A. Horadagoda
KNK.S. Nandra
K.S. Nandra
IBI. Barchia
I. Barchia

8 July 2019 in Animals
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Sabrina LomaxSabrina Lomax
Sabrina Lomax
PCPatricia Colusso
Patricia Colusso
CCCameron Clark
Cameron Clark
Pasture management in Australia’s dairy industry requires the manual shifiting of temporary electric fences to maintain pasture quality and growth. Virtual fencing presents an alternative to save time and labour costs. We used automated virtual fence (VF) collars to determine the variation in learning of the virtual fence stimuli, and evaluated the success of the technology to contain cows in a predetermined area of pasture. Twelve Holstein-Friesian non-lactating multiparous dairy cows were fitted with the collars, and a VF was used to restrict cows to two grazing allocations (G1 and G2) across six days. Cows received an audio tone (AT) when they approached the virtual fence, and a paired electrical pulse (EP) if they continued forward. The VF contained cows within predetermined areas for 99% of time, but cows spent the least time near the fence (p < 0.01). The number of stimuli reduced through time, demonstrating the ability of cows to learn the VF (p = 0.01). However, the mean number of EP per day ranged from 1 to 6.5 between individuals (p < 0.01). Therefore, successful containment may have a welfare cost for some individuals. Further work should focus on this individual variation, including measures of welfare.

1 January 2016 in Animal
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
AJA. J. John
A. J. John
CCCameron Clark
Cameron Clark
MFMark Freeman
Mark Freeman
KKK. L. Kerrisk
K. L. Kerrisk
SGSergio C. Garcia
Sergio C. Garcia
IHI. Halachmi
I. Halachmi
Automatic milking systems (AMS), one of the earliest precision livestock farming developments, have revolutionized dairy farming around the world. While robots control the milking process, there have also been numerous changes to how the whole farm system is managed. Milking is no longer performed in defined sessions; rather, the cow can now choose when to be milked in AMS, allowing milking to be distributed throughout a 24 h period. Despite this ability, there has been little attention given to milking robot utilization across 24 h. In order to formulate relevant research questions and improve farm AMS management there is a need to determine the current knowledge gaps regarding the distribution of robot utilization. Feed, animal and management factors and their interplay on levels of milking robot utilization across 24 h for both indoor and pasture-based systems are here reviewed. The impact of the timing, type and quantity of feed offered and their interaction with the distance of feed from the parlour; herd social dynamics, climate and various other management factors on robot utilization through 24 h are provided. This novel review draws together both the opportunities and challenges that exist for farm management to use these factors to improved system efficiency and those that exist for further research.

22 October 2021 in Animals
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
YQYongliang Qiao
Yongliang Qiao
HKHe Kong
He Kong
CCCameron Clark
Cameron Clark
Sabrina LomaxSabrina Lomax
Sabrina Lomax
DSDaobilige Su
Daobilige Su
SSSalah Sukkarieh
Salah Sukkarieh
The growing world population has increased the demand for animal-sourced protein. However, animal farming productivity is faced with challenges from traditional farming practices, socioeconomic status, and climate change. In recent years, smart sensors, big data, and deep learning have been applied to animal welfare measurement and livestock farming applications, including behaviour recognition and health monitoring. In order to facilitate research in this area, this review summarises and analyses some main techniques used in smart livestock farming, focusing on those related to cattle lameness detection and behaviour recognition. In this study, more than 100 relevant papers on cattle lameness detection and behaviour recognition have been evaluated and discussed. Based on a review and a comparison of recent technologies and methods, we anticipate that intelligent perception for cattle behaviour and welfare monitoring will develop towards standardisation, a larger scale, and intelligence, combined with Internet of things (IoT) and deep learning technologies. In addition, the key challenges and opportunities of future research are also highlighted and discussed.

1 October 2018 in Journal of Dairy Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MKM. Khatun
M. Khatun
PTP.C. Thomson
P.C. Thomson
KKK.L. Kerrisk
K.L. Kerrisk
NLN.A. Lyons
N.A. Lyons
CCCameron Clark
Cameron Clark
SGS.C. García
S.C. García
This study investigated the potential for accurate detection of clinical mastitis (CM) in an automatic milking system (AMS) using electronic data from the support software. Data from cows were used to develop the model, which was then tested on 2 independent data sets, 1 with 311 cows (same farm but from a different year) and 1 with 568 cows (from a different farm). In addition, the model was used to test how well it could predict CM 1 to 3 d before actual clinical diagnosis. Logistic mixed models were used for the analysis. Twelve measurements were included in the initial model before a backward elimination, which resulted in the following 6 measurements being included in the final model: quarter-level milk yield (MY; kg), electrical conductivity (EC; mS/cm), average milk flow rate (MF; kg/min), occurrence of incompletely milked quarters in each milking session (IM; yes or no), MY per hour (MYH; kg/h), and EC per hour (ECH; mS/cm/h) between successive milking sessions. The other 6 measurements tested but not included in the final model were peak milk flow rate (kg/min), kick-offs (yes or no) in each milking session, lactation number, days in milk (d), blood in milk (yes or no), and a calculated mastitis detection index used by DeLaval (DelPro software; DeLaval International AB, Tumba, Sweden). All measurements were assessed to determine their ability to detect CM as both individual variables and combinations of the 12 above-mentioned variables. These were assessed by producing a receiver operating characteristic curve and calculating the area under the curve (AUC) for each model. Overall, 9 measurements (i.e., EC, ECH, MY, MYH, MF, IM, peak flow rate, lactation number, and mastitis detection index) had significant mastitis detection ability as separate predictors. The best mastitis prediction was possible by incorporating 6 measurements (i.e., EC, ECH, MY, MYH, MF, and IM) as well as the random cow and quarter effects in the model, resulting in 90% sensitivity and 91% specificity with excellent AUC (0.96). Assessment of the model was found to produce robust results (AUC >0.9) in different data sets and could detect CM with reductions in sensitivity and specificity with increasing days before actual diagnosis. This study demonstrated that improved mastitis status prediction can be achieved by using multiple measurements, and new indexes based on that are expected to result in improved accuracy of mastitis alerts, thereby improving the detection ability and utility on farm.