Sergio C. Garcia

Prof. Sergio C. Garcia

Sydney Institute of Agriculture, School of Life and Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Science, The University of Sydney
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

28Years (1999-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 March 2015 in Journal of Dairy Science
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
JHJames Hills
James Hills
WWW.J. Wales
W.J. Wales
Frank R. DunsheaFrank R. Dunshea
Frank R. Dunshea
SGSergio C. Garcia
Sergio C. Garcia
JRJohn R. Roche
John R. Roche
In pasture-based dairy systems, supplementary feeds are used to increase dry matter intake and milk production. Historically, supplementation involved the provision of the same amount of feed (usually a grain-based concentrate feed) to each cow in the herd during milking (i.e., flat-rate feeding). The increasing availability of computerized feeding and milk monitoring technology in milking parlors, however, has led to increased interest in the potential benefits of feeding individual cows (i.e., individualized or differential feeding) different amounts and types of supplements according to one or more parameters (e.g., breeding value for milk yield, current milk yield, days in milk, body condition score, reproduction status, parity). In this review, we consider the likely benefits of individualized supplementary feeding strategies for pasture-based dairy cows fed supplements in the bail during milking. A unique feature of our review compared with earlier publications is the focus on individualized feeding strategies under practical grazing management. Previous reviews focused primarily on research undertaken in situations where cows were offered ad libitum forage, whereas we consider the likely benefits of individualized supplementary feeding strategies under rotational grazing management, wherein pasture is often restricted to all or part of a herd. The review provides compelling evidence that between-cow differences in response to concentrate supplements support the concept of individualized supplementary feeding.

1 January 2016 in Animal
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
AJA. J. John
A. J. John
CCCameron Clark
Cameron Clark
MFMark Freeman
Mark Freeman
KKK. L. Kerrisk
K. L. Kerrisk
SGSergio C. Garcia
Sergio C. Garcia
IHI. Halachmi
I. Halachmi
Automatic milking systems (AMS), one of the earliest precision livestock farming developments, have revolutionized dairy farming around the world. While robots control the milking process, there have also been numerous changes to how the whole farm system is managed. Milking is no longer performed in defined sessions; rather, the cow can now choose when to be milked in AMS, allowing milking to be distributed throughout a 24 h period. Despite this ability, there has been little attention given to milking robot utilization across 24 h. In order to formulate relevant research questions and improve farm AMS management there is a need to determine the current knowledge gaps regarding the distribution of robot utilization. Feed, animal and management factors and their interplay on levels of milking robot utilization across 24 h for both indoor and pasture-based systems are here reviewed. The impact of the timing, type and quantity of feed offered and their interaction with the distance of feed from the parlour; herd social dynamics, climate and various other management factors on robot utilization through 24 h are provided. This novel review draws together both the opportunities and challenges that exist for farm management to use these factors to improved system efficiency and those that exist for further research.

29 July 2008 in Australian Journal of Agricultural Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Brendan CullenBrendan Cullen
Brendan Cullen
RER. J. Eckard
R. J. Eckard
MCM. N. Callow
M. N. Callow
IJI. R. Johnson
I. R. Johnson
DCD. F. Chapman
D. F. Chapman
VSVal Snow
Val Snow
DairyMod, EcoMod, and the SGS Pasture Model are mechanistic biophysical models developed to explore scenarios in grazing systems. The aim of this manuscript was to test the ability of the models to simulate net herbage accumulation rates of ryegrass-based pastures across a range of environments and pasture management systems in Australia and New Zealand. Measured monthly net herbage accumulation rate and accumulated yield data were collated from ten grazing system experiments at eight sites ranging from cool temperate to subtropical environments. The local climate, soil, pasture species, and management (N fertiliser, irrigation, and grazing or cutting pattern) were described in the model for each site, and net herbage accumulation rates modelled. The model adequately simulated the monthly net herbage accumulation rates across the range of environments, based on the summary statistics and observed patterns of seasonal growth, particularly when the variability in measured herbage accumulation rates was taken into account. Agreement between modelled and observed growth rates was more accurate and precise in temperate than in subtropical environments, and in winter and summer than in autumn and spring. Similarly, agreement between predicted and observed accumulated yields was more accurate than monthly net herbage accumulation. Different temperature parameters were used to describe the growth of perennial ryegrass cultivars and annual ryegrass; these differences were in line with observed growth patterns and breeding objectives. Results are discussed in the context of the difficulties in measuring pasture growth rates and model limitations.

1 April 2014 in Theriogenology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
STS. Talukder
S. Talukder
KKK.L. Kerrisk
K.L. Kerrisk
LIL. Ingenhoff
L. Ingenhoff
PTPeter Thomson
Peter Thomson
SGSergio C. Garcia
Sergio C. Garcia
PCPietro Celi
Pietro Celi

1 December 2010 in The Veterinary Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MPMariana Pedernera
Mariana Pedernera
PCPietro Celi
Pietro Celi
SGSergio C. Garcia
Sergio C. Garcia
HSHannah E. Salvin
Hannah E. Salvin
IBIdris Barchia
Idris Barchia
WFWilliam J. Fulkerson
William J. Fulkerson

7 October 2005 in Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
SGSergio C. Garcia
Sergio C. Garcia
WFW. J. Fulkerson
W. J. Fulkerson
During the last decade, Australian dairy farmers have been challenged to increase total factor productivity (the ratio between the rate of increase in total output and the rate of increase in the use of all inputs) in order to attenuate the negative effects of a steady decline in the terms of trade over the same period of time. Overall, the increase in total factor productivity has been low (1.5%) and farmers are questioning the most appropriate production system for the future. In an attempt to address this central question, we first identified the nature of the key pressures dairy farmers in Australia are likely to face in the future, namely labour and feed related issues. We then discuss major opportunities for developing new dairy production systems based on increased efficiency in the use of land and cows and on increasing the efficiency of labour management and lifestyle. We do not attempt to provide the best futuristic option for dairy systems in Australia. Instead, this review discusses key areas of the production system with potential to impact positively on any or all the physical, economic and labour-related aspects of modern dairy farming. By so doing, this review highlights the research questions that need to be addressed now in order to provide Australian dairy farmers with improved tools to manage their production systems in the future.