Riccardo Vinciguerra

Dr. Riccardo Vinciguerra

1. St. Paul’s Eye Unit, Royal Liverpool University Hospital, Liverpool L7 8XP, UK
+2
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

18Years (2009-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 March 2009 in Ophthalmology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PVPaolo Vinciguerra
Paolo Vinciguerra
EAElena Albè
Elena Albè
STSilvia Trazza
Silvia Trazza
PRPietro Rosetta
Pietro Rosetta
Riccardo VinciguerraRiccardo Vinciguerra
Riccardo Vinciguerra
DEDan Epstein
Dan Epstein

1 August 2016 in Journal of Refractive Surgery
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Riccardo VinciguerraRiccardo Vinciguerra
Riccardo Vinciguerra
Ahmed ElsheikhAhmed Elsheikh
Ahmed Elsheikh
CRCynthia J. Roberts
Cynthia J. Roberts
RARenato Ambrósio
Renato Ambrósio
DKDavid Sung Yong Kang
David Sung Yong Kang
PVPaolo Vinciguerra
Paolo Vinciguerra
PURPOSE: To evaluate the influence of pachymetry, age, and intraocular pressure in normal patients and to provide normative values for all dynamic corneal response parameters (DCRs) provided by dynamic Scheimpflug analysis. METHODS: Seven hundred five healthy patients were included in this multicenter retrospective study. The biomechanical response data were analyzed to obtain normative values with their dependence on corrected and clinically validated intraocular pressure estimates developed using the finite element method (bIOP), central corneal thickness (CCT), and age, and to evaluate the influence of bIOP, CCT, and age. RESULTS: The results showed that all DCRs were correlated with bIOP except deflection amplitude (DefA) ratio, highest concavity (HC) radius, and inverse concave radius. The analysis of the relationship of DCRs with CCT indicated that HC radius, inverse concave radius, deformation amplitude (DA) ratio, and DefA ratio were correlated with CCT (rho values of 0.343, −0.407, −0.444, and −0.406, respectively). The age group subanalysis revealed that primarily whole eye movement followed by DA ratio and inverse concave radius were the parameters that were most influenced by age. Finally, custom software was created to compare normative values to imported examinations. CONCLUSIONS: HC radius, inverse concave radius, DA ratio, and DefA ratio were shown to be suitable parameters to evaluate in vivo corneal biomechanics due to their independence from IOP and their correlation with pachymetry and age. The creation of normative values allows the interpretation of an abnormal examination without the need to match every case with another normal patient matched for CCT and IOP. [ J Refract Surg . 2016;32(8):550–561.]

1 May 2013 in Ophthalmology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Riccardo VinciguerraRiccardo Vinciguerra
Riccardo Vinciguerra
MRMario R. Romano
Mario R. Romano
FCFabrizio I. Camesasca
Fabrizio I. Camesasca
CAClaudio Azzolini
Claudio Azzolini
STSilvia Trazza
Silvia Trazza
PVPaolo Vinciguerra
Paolo Vinciguerra

5 February 2020 in Eye and Vision
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LELouise Pellegrino Gomes Esporcatte
Louise Pellegrino Gomes Esporcatte
MSMarcella Q. Salomão
Marcella Q. Salomão
BLBernardo T. Lopes
Bernardo T. Lopes
PVPaolo Vinciguerra
Paolo Vinciguerra
Riccardo VinciguerraRiccardo Vinciguerra
Riccardo Vinciguerra
RARENATO AMBROSIO
RENATO AMBROSIO
Corneal biomechanics has been a hot topic for research in contemporary ophthalmology due to its prospective applications in diagnosis, management, and treatment of several clinical conditions, including glaucoma, elective keratorefractive surgery, and different corneal diseases. The clinical biomechanical investigation has become of great importance in the setting of refractive surgery to identify patients at higher risk of developing iatrogenic ectasia after laser vision correction. This review discusses the latest developments in the detection of corneal ectatic diseases. These developments should be considered in conjunction with multimodal corneal and refractive imaging, including Placido-disk based corneal topography, Scheimpflug corneal tomography, anterior segment tomography, spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT), very-high-frequency ultrasound (VHF-US), ocular biometry, and ocular wavefront measurements. The ocular response analyzer (ORA) and the Corvis ST are non-contact tonometry systems that provide a clinical corneal biomechanical assessment. More recently, Brillouin optical microscopy has been demonstrated to provide in vivo biomechanical measurements. The integration of tomographic and biomechanical data into artificial intelligence techniques has demonstrated the ability to increase the accuracy to detect ectatic disease and characterize the inherent susceptibility for biomechanical failure and ectasia progression, which is a severe complication after laser vision correction.

4 May 2014 in BioMed Research International
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SDSimone Donati
Simone Donati
SCSimona Maria Caprani
Simona Maria Caprani
GAGiulia Airaghi
Giulia Airaghi
Riccardo VinciguerraRiccardo Vinciguerra
Riccardo Vinciguerra
LBLuigi Bartalena
Luigi Bartalena
CAClaudio Azzolini
Claudio Azzolini
Vitreoretinal surgery has advanced in numerous directions during recent years. The removal of the vitreous body is one of the main characteristics of this surgical procedure. Several molecules have been tested in the past to fill the vitreous cavity and to mimic its functions. We here review the currently available vitreous substitutes, focusing on their molecular properties and functions, together with their adverse effects. Afterwards we describe the characteristics of the ideal vitreous substitute. The challenges facing every ophthalmology researcher are to reach a long-term intraocular permanence of vitreous substitute with total inertness of the molecule injected and the control of inflammatory reactions. We report new polymers with gelification characteristics and smart hydrogels representing the future of vitreoretinal surgery. Finally, we describe the current studies on vitreous regeneration and cell cultures to create new intraocular gels with optimal biocompatibility and rheological properties.

28 March 2019 in British Journal of Ophthalmology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Riccardo VinciguerraRiccardo Vinciguerra
Riccardo Vinciguerra
SRSalwah Rehman
Salwah Rehman
NVNeeru A Vallabh
Neeru A Vallabh
MBMark Batterbury
Mark Batterbury
GCGabriela Czanner
Gabriela Czanner
Colin E. WilloughbyColin E. Willoughby
Colin E. Willoughby
Aims To compare the biomechanically corrected intraocular pressure (IOP) estimate (bIOP) provided by the Corvis-ST with Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT-IOP) in patients with high-tension and normal-tension primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG; HTG and NTG), ocular hypertension (OHT) and controls. Moreover, we compared dynamic corneal response parameters (DCRs) of the Corvis-ST in POAG, OHT and controls, evaluated the correlation between global visual field parameters mean deviation and pattern SD (MD and PSD) and DCRs in the POAG group. Methods 156 eyes of 156 patients were included in this prospective, single-centre, observational study, namely 41 HTG and 33 NTG, 45 OHT cases and 37 controls. Central corneal thickness (CCT), GAT-IOP and bIOP were measured, GAT-IOP was also adjusted for CCT (GATAdj). DCRs provided by Corvis-ST were evaluated, MD and PSD were recorded by 24–2 full-threshold visual field. To evaluate the difference in DCRs between OHT, HTG and NTG, a general linear model was used with sex, medications and group as fixed factors and bIOP and age as covariates. Results There was a significant difference between GAT-IOP, GATAdj and bIOP in NTG and HTG, OHT and controls. NTG corneas were significantly softer and more deformable compared with controls, OHT and HTG as demonstrated by significantly lower values of stiffness parameters A1 and highest concavity and higher values of inverse concave radius (all p<0.05). There was a significant correlation (p<0.05) between MD, PSD and many DCRs with POAG patients with softer or more compliant corneas more likely to show visual field defects. Conclusions Corneal biomechanics might be a significant confounding factor for IOP measurement that should be considered in clinical decision-making. The abnormality of corneal biomechanics in NTG and the significant correlation with visual field parameters might suggest a new risk factor for the development or progression of NTG.