Aristeidis Tsagkaris

Dr. Aristeidis Tsagkaris

University of Chemistry and Technology Prague
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

11Years (2016-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 December 2016 in TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
GDGeorgios Danezis
Georgios Danezis
Aristeidis TsagkarisAristeidis Tsagkaris
Aristeidis Tsagkaris
Federica CaminFederica Camin
Federica Camin
VBVladimir Brusic
Vladimir Brusic
CGConstantinos A Georgiou
Constantinos A Georgiou

1 August 2016 in Current Opinion in Food Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
GDGeorgios Danezis
Georgios Danezis
Aristeidis TsagkarisAristeidis Tsagkaris
Aristeidis Tsagkaris
VBVladimir Brusic
Vladimir Brusic
CGConstantinos A Georgiou
Constantinos A Georgiou

1 August 2020 in TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
JNJoost Laurus Dinant Nelis
Joost Laurus Dinant Nelis
Aristeidis TsagkarisAristeidis Tsagkaris
Aristeidis Tsagkaris
MDM.J. Dillon
M.J. Dillon
JHJana Hajšlová
Jana Hajšlová
CEC.T. Elliott
C.T. Elliott
Smartphone based devices (SBDs) have the potential to revolutionize food safety control by empowering citizens to perform screening tests. To achieve this, it is of paramount importance to understand current research efforts and identify key technology gaps. Therefore, a systematic review of optical SBDs in the food safety sector was performed. An overview of reviewed SBDs is given focusing on performance characteristics as well as image analysis procedures. The state-of-the-art on commercially available SBDs is also provided. This analysis revealed several important technology gaps, the most prominent of which are: (i) the need to reach a consensus regarding optimal image analysis, (ii) the need to assess the effect of measurement variation caused by using different smartphones and (iii) the need to standardize validation procedures to obtain robust data. Addressing these issues will drive the development of SBDs and potentially unlock their massive potential for citizen-based food control.

17 March 2021 in RSC Advances
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Aristeidis TsagkarisAristeidis Tsagkaris
Aristeidis Tsagkaris
GKGEORGIOS KOULIS
GEORGIOS KOULIS
GDGeorgios P. Danezis
Georgios P. Danezis
IMIoannis Martakos
Ioannis Martakos
MDMarilena Dasenaki
Marilena Dasenaki
Nikolaos ThomaidisNikolaos Thomaidis
Nikolaos Thomaidis
An all-time bibliometric analysis to reveal trends in honey authenticity and critically discuss modern analytical techniques used to determine the origin of honey.

1 December 2019 in TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Aristeidis TsagkarisAristeidis Tsagkaris
Aristeidis Tsagkaris
JNJoost Laurus Dinant Nelis
Joost Laurus Dinant Nelis
GRGeorgina Ross
Georgina Ross
SJS. Jafari
S. Jafari
JGJ. Guercetti
J. Guercetti
JHJana Hajšlová
Jana Hajšlová

17 June 2021 in Foods
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SJSafiye Jafari
Safiye Jafari
JGJulian Guercetti
Julian Guercetti
AGAriadni Geballa-Koukoula
Ariadni Geballa-Koukoula
Aristeidis TsagkarisAristeidis Tsagkaris
Aristeidis Tsagkaris
JNJoost Laurus Dinant Nelis
Joost Laurus Dinant Nelis
SSShana Sturla
Shana Sturla
Standard methods for chemical food safety testing in official laboratories rely largely on liquid or gas chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry. Although these methods are considered the gold standard for quantitative confirmatory analysis, they require sampling, transferring the samples to a central laboratory to be tested by highly trained personnel, and the use of expensive equipment. Therefore, there is an increasing demand for portable and handheld devices to provide rapid, efficient, and on-site screening of food contaminants. Recent technological advancements in the field include smartphone-based, microfluidic chip-based, and paper-based devices integrated with electrochemical and optical biosensing platforms. Furthermore, the potential application of portable mass spectrometers in food testing might bring the confirmatory analysis from the laboratory to the field in the future. Although such systems open new promising possibilities for portable food testing, few of these devices are commercially available. To understand why barriers remain, portable food analyzers reported in the literature over the last ten years were reviewed. To this end, the analytical performance of these devices and the extent they match the World Health Organization benchmark for diagnostic tests, i.e., the Affordable, Sensitive, Specific, User-friendly, Rapid and Robust, Equipment-free, and Deliverable to end-users (ASSURED) criteria, was evaluated critically. A five-star scoring system was used to assess their potential to be implemented as food safety testing systems. The main findings highlight the need for concentrated efforts towards combining the best features of different technologies, to bridge technological gaps and meet commercialization requirements.