Maeva Philippot

Ms. Maeva Philippot

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

9Years (2018-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
19 February 2019 in Batteries
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MPMaeva Philippot
Maeva Philippot
GAGarbiñe Alvarez
Garbiñe Alvarez
EAElixabete Ayerbe
Elixabete Ayerbe
Joeri Van MierloJoeri Van Mierlo
Joeri Van Mierlo
MMMaarten Messagie
Maarten Messagie
Lithium-ion battery packs inside electric vehicles represents a high share of the final price. Nevertheless, with technology advances and the growth of the market, the price of the battery is getting more competitive. The greenhouse gas emissions and the battery cost have been studied previously, but coherent boundaries between environmental and economic assessments are needed to assess the eco-efficiency of batteries. In this research, a detailed study is presented, providing an environmental and economic assessment of the manufacturing of one specific lithium-ion battery chemistry. The relevance of parameters is pointed out, including the manufacturing place, the production volume, the commodity prices, and the energy density. The inventory is obtained by dismantling commercial cells. The correlation between the battery cost and the commodity price is much lower than the correlation between the battery cost and the production volume. The developed life cycle assessment concludes that the electricity mix that is used to power the battery factory is a key parameter for the impact of the battery manufacturing on climate change. To improve the battery manufacturing eco-efficiency, a high production capacity and an electricity mix with low carbon intensity are suggested. Optimizing the process by reducing the electricity consumption during the manufacturing is also suggested, and combined with higher pack energy density, the impact on climate change of the pack manufacturing is as low as 39.5 kg CO2 eq/kWh.

24 June 2022 in Journal of Cleaner Production
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MPMaeva Philippot
Maeva Philippot
DCDaniele Costa
Daniele Costa
Md Sazzad HosenMd Sazzad Hosen
Md Sazzad Hosen
ASAnthony Senécat
Anthony Senécat
EBErwin Brouwers
Erwin Brouwers
MMMaarten Messagie
Maarten Messagie

20 May 2024 in Cleaner Environmental Systems
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
AOAnne E.M. van Den Oever
Anne E.M. van Den Oever
SPStefano Puricelli
Stefano Puricelli
DCDaniele Costa
Daniele Costa
NTNils Thonemann
Nils Thonemann
MPMaeva Philippot
Maeva Philippot
MMMaarten Messagie
Maarten Messagie

4 November 2024 in Data in Brief
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
AOAnne E.M. van Den Oever
Anne E.M. van Den Oever
SPStefano Puricelli
Stefano Puricelli
DCDaniele Costa
Daniele Costa
NTNils Thonemann
Nils Thonemann
MPMaeva Philippot
Maeva Philippot
MMMaarten Messagie
Maarten Messagie
This dataset provides the latest characterization factors for ozone depletion based on the most recent ozone depletion potentials from the 2022 World Meteorological Organization (WMO) scientific assessment. These characterization factors can be used in life cycle assessment (LCA) to convert emissions of ozone-depleting substances to the common unit of the ozone depletion impact category, measured in kg CFC-11-eq. The dataset is formatted for easy import into LCA software such as Brightway, the Activity Browser, and SimaPro. The characterization factors are provided for both 100-year and infinite time horizons. The dataset addresses the current limitations of life cycle impact assessment (LCIA) methods, which are outdated and lack comprehensive substance coverage, by including 318 substances reported in the latest WMO assessment. This update ensures relevance for current ozone depletion assessment, including substances banned but still in use, very short-lived substances, and N2O. The methodology for updating and converting characterization factors is provided, supporting future updates in line with new scientific assessments. The dataset aims to enhance the accuracy and comprehensiveness of ozone depletion impact assessments in LCA studies.

19 September 2018
Verified
Conference Paper
Closed access
MPMaeva Philippot
Maeva Philippot
JSJelle Smekens
Jelle Smekens
JMJoeri VAN Mierlo
Joeri VAN Mierlo
MMMaarten Messagie
Maarten Messagie
Welcome to the WIT Press eLibrary - the home of the Transactions of the Wessex Institute collection, providing on-line access to papers presented at the Institute's prestigious international conferences and from its State-of-the-Art in Science & Engineering publications.

1 June 2023 in Energies
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
DHDominik Huber
Dominik Huber
AAAnder Martinez Alonso
Ander Martinez Alonso
MPMaeva Philippot
Maeva Philippot
MMMaarten Messagie
Maarten Messagie
Even though eco-efficiency (EE) is already applied to various energy systems, so far, no study investigates in detail the hourly, marginal and seasonal impacts of a decentralized energy system. This study assesses the hourly EE of the Research Park Zellik (RPZ), located in the Brussels metropolitan area for 2022 composed of photovoltaic installations, wind turbines and batteries. A cradle-to-grave life cycle assessment (LCA) to identify the carbon footprint (CF) and a levelized cost of electricity (LCOE) calculation is conducted. An existing design optimization framework is applied to the RPZ. Consumption data are obtained from smart meters of five consumers at the RPZ on a one-hour time resolution for 2022 and upscaled based on the annual consumption of the RPZ. As the EE is presented as the sum of the CF and the LCOE, a lower EE corresponds to an economically and environmentally preferable energy system. In a comparative framework, the developed method is applied to two different case studies, namely, (i) to an energy system in Vega de Valcerce in Spain and (ii) to an energy system in Bèli Bartoka in Poland. The average EE of the RPZ energy system in 2022 is 0.15 per kWh, while the average EE of the Polish and Spanish energy systems are 1.48 and 0.36 per kWh, respectively. When analyzing four selected weeks, both the LCOE and CF of the RPZ energy system are driven by the consumption of the Belgian electricity grid mix. In contrast, due to the very low LCOE and CF of the renewable energy sources, in particular wind turbines, the RPZ energy system’s EE benefits and lies below the EE of the Belgium electricity grid mix.