Soo-Yeon Kim

Dr. Soo-Yeon Kim


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

13Years (2014-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
4 June 2018 in Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SCSeoyoung Choi
Seoyoung Choi
YSYong Beom Shin
Yong Beom Shin
SKSoo-Yeon Kim
Soo-Yeon Kim
JKJonghyun Kim
Jonghyun Kim
To provide effective interventions for spasticity, accurate and reliable spasticity assessment is essential. For the assessment, the Modified Tardieu Scale (MTS) has been widely used owing to its simplicity and convenience. However, it has poor or moderate accuracy and reliability. We proposed a novel inertial measurement unit (IMU)-based MTS assessment system to improve the accuracy and reliability of the MTS itself. The proposed system consists of a joint angle calculation algorithm, a function to detect abnormal muscle reaction (a catch and clonus), and a visual biofeedback mechanism. Through spastic knee and ankle joint assessment, the proposed IMU-based MTS assessment system was compared with the conventional MTS assessment system in 28 children with cerebral palsy by two raters. The results showed that the proposed system has good accuracy (root mean square error < 3.2°) and test-retest and inter-rater reliabilities (ICC > 0.8), while the conventional MTS system has poor or moderate reliability. Moreover, we found that the deteriorated reliability of the conventional MTS system comes from its goniometric measurement as well as from irregular passive stretch velocity. The proposed system, which is clinically relevant, can significantly improve the accuracy and reliability of the MTS in lower limbs for children with cerebral palsy.

19 December 2019 in Medicina
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CLChang-Hyung Lee
Chang-Hyung Lee
SHSung-Jin Heo
Sung-Jin Heo
SPSo Hyun Park
So Hyun Park
HJHee Seok Jeong
Hee Seok Jeong
SKSoo-Yeon Kim
Soo-Yeon Kim
Background and Objectives: Lumbar traction is widely used as a non-operative treatment for lumbar intervertebral disc disease. The effect of traditional traction (TT) using linear-type traction devices remains controversial for various reasons, including technical limitations. Thus, the purpose of this study was to compare the effects of the newly developed lumbar lordotic curve-controlled traction (L-LCCT) and TT on functional changes in patients and morphological changes in the vertebral disc. Materials and Methods: A total of 40 patients with lumbar intervertebral disc disease at the L4/5 or L5/S1 level as confirmed by magnetic resonance imaging were recruited and divided into two groups (L-LCCT or TT). The comprehensive health status changes of the patients were recorded using pain and functional scores (the visual analogue scale, the Oswestry Disability Index, and the Roland–Morris Disability Questionnaire) and morphological changes (in the lumbar central canal area) before and after traction treatment. Results: Pain scores were significantly decreased after traction in both groups (p < 0.05). However, functional scores and morphological changes improved significantly after treatment in the L-LCCT group only (p < 0.05). Conclusions: We suggest that L-LCCT is a viable option for resolving the technical limitations of TT by maintaining the lumbar lordotic curve in patients with lumbar intervertebral disc disease.

31 December 2019 in Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
KKKyung Ah Kim
Kyung Ah Kim
JLJungsoo Lee
Jungsoo Lee
Won Hyuk ChangWon Hyuk Chang
Won Hyuk Chang
deog young kimdeog young kim
deog young kim
YSYong-Il Shin
Yong-Il Shin
YKYun-Hee Kim
Yun-Hee Kim
To investigate longitudinal changes in language function in left-hemispheric ischemic stroke patients as well as factors that influence language recovery until 1 year after stroke onset. We analyzed data from 235 patients with first-ever left-hemispheric ischemic stroke. All patients completed the Korean version of the Frenchay Aphasia Screening Test (K-FAST) at 7 days (T1), 3 months (T2), 6 months (T3), and 1 year (T4) after stroke onset. Repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to investigate changes in language function between time points. Subgroup analysis was performed according to the K-FAST scores at T1. Stroke lesion volume was assessed using diffusion tensor images, and involvement of language-related brain regions was examined. Multiple regression analysis was used to analyze factors influencing improvement of K-FAST score. The K-FAST scores at T1, T2, T3, and T4 differed significantly (p<0.05). In the subgroup analysis, only the severe group showed continuous significant improvement by 1 year. Factors that negatively influenced improvement of language function were the age at onset, initial National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score, and initial K-FAST score, whereas education level and stroke lesion volume positively affected recovery. Involvement of language-related brain regions did not significantly influence long-term language recovery after ischemic stroke. Recovery of language function varied according to the severity of the initial language deficit. The age at stroke onset, education level, initial severity of aphasia, initial NIHSS score, and total stroke lesion volume were found to be important factors for recovery of language function.

1 January 2017 in Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
WCWoo Hyuk Choi
Woo Hyuk Choi
MSMyungjun Shin
Myungjun Shin
MJMyung Hun Jang
Myung Hun Jang
JLJe Sang Lee
Je Sang Lee
SKSoo-Yeon Kim
Soo-Yeon Kim
YSYong Beom Shin
Yong Beom Shin
Choi WH, et al. Ann Rehabil Med. 2017 Apr;41(2):299-305. https://doi.org/10.5535/arm.2017.41.2.299

CLChang-Hyung Lee
Chang-Hyung Lee
SHSung-Jin Heo
Sung-Jin Heo
SPSo Hyun Park
So Hyun Park
HJHee Seok Jeong
Hee Seok Jeong
SKSoo-Yeon Kim
Soo-Yeon Kim
The newly developed cervical lordotic curve-controlled traction (C-LCCT) appears to be an ideal method to improve the treatment outcome in patients with cervical intervertebral disc disease. The purpose of this study was to investigate the treatment outcomes of C-LCCT including the functional and morphological changes of the cervical intervertebral disc compared to traditional traction (TT) with a randomized controlled trial design. A total of 40 patients with cervical intervertebral disc disease at the C5/6 level confirmed by magnetic resonance imaging were recruited and assigned to either the C-LCCT group or the TT group. The comprehensive health status changes of the patients were recorded using pain and functional scores (Visual Analogue Scale, Oswestry Disability Index) and morphological changes (cervical lordosis, cervical central canal area) before and after the traction treatment. Both groups showed a significant improvement in pain scores after traction (p < 0.05). The functional score and morphological changes improved significantly after treatment in the C-LCCT group. However, there was no significant improvement in the TT group (p < 0.05). The C-LCCT showed significant pain, functional, and morphological improvement compared to TT. C-LCCT could be effective in improving the treatment outcomes of the traction technique in patients with cervical intervertebral disc disease.

1 January 2016 in Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MJMyung Hun Jang
Myung Hun Jang
CLChang-Hyung Lee
Chang-Hyung Lee
YSYong-Il Shin
Yong-Il Shin
SKSoo-Yeon Kim
Soo-Yeon Kim
SHSungchul Huh
Sungchul Huh
Jang MH, et al. Ann Rehabil Med. 2016 Oct;40(5):835-844. https://doi.org/10.5535/arm.2016.40.5.835