The aim of this study was to examine the factors influencing perceived oral health in elderly individuals residing in the community. This study used raw data from the Korea community health survey, 2016. Of the 64,223 participants that were elderly (aged ≥ 65 years), 61,280 (95.4%) were included for analysis. Self-rated oral health was the dependent variable and 6 independent variables including age, gender, type of area of residence (metropolitan or provincial), educational level, income, and living status with spouse were assessed. Oral function was studied based on mastication, pronunciation, and use of dentures, and oral health behavior included brushing teeth after breakfast, after lunch, after dinner, and before sleep). The EQ-5D questionnaire measured health-related quality of life (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression). Among the general characteristics, age, gender, educational level, income, and living status with spouse were the factors that affected self-rated oral health. Mastication, pronunciation, use of dentures, and brushing after lunch, dinner, and before sleep were the factors that influenced self-rated oral function. All domains of the EQ-5D (pain/discomfort, mobility, self-care, usual activities, and anxiety/depression) were factors that affected self-rated oral health. The results of the current investigation suggest that the development of management and education strategies for oral health promotion in the elderly, should focus on improving oral function and oral health behavior, taking into account the socio-economic and demographic characteristics that have been shown to be associated with poor self-rated oral function.

Background and Objectives: Lumbar traction is widely used as a non-operative treatment for lumbar intervertebral disc disease. The effect of traditional traction (TT) using linear-type traction devices remains controversial for various reasons, including technical limitations. Thus, the purpose of this study was to compare the effects of the newly developed lumbar lordotic curve-controlled traction (L-LCCT) and TT on functional changes in patients and morphological changes in the vertebral disc. Materials and Methods: A total of 40 patients with lumbar intervertebral disc disease at the L4/5 or L5/S1 level as confirmed by magnetic resonance imaging were recruited and divided into two groups (L-LCCT or TT). The comprehensive health status changes of the patients were recorded using pain and functional scores (the visual analogue scale, the Oswestry Disability Index, and the Roland–Morris Disability Questionnaire) and morphological changes (in the lumbar central canal area) before and after traction treatment. Results: Pain scores were significantly decreased after traction in both groups (p < 0.05). However, functional scores and morphological changes improved significantly after treatment in the L-LCCT group only (p < 0.05). Conclusions: We suggest that L-LCCT is a viable option for resolving the technical limitations of TT by maintaining the lumbar lordotic curve in patients with lumbar intervertebral disc disease.

The newly developed cervical lordotic curve-controlled traction (C-LCCT) appears to be an ideal method to improve the treatment outcome in patients with cervical intervertebral disc disease. The purpose of this study was to investigate the treatment outcomes of C-LCCT including the functional and morphological changes of the cervical intervertebral disc compared to traditional traction (TT) with a randomized controlled trial design. A total of 40 patients with cervical intervertebral disc disease at the C5/6 level confirmed by magnetic resonance imaging were recruited and assigned to either the C-LCCT group or the TT group. The comprehensive health status changes of the patients were recorded using pain and functional scores (Visual Analogue Scale, Oswestry Disability Index) and morphological changes (cervical lordosis, cervical central canal area) before and after the traction treatment. Both groups showed a significant improvement in pain scores after traction (p < 0.05). The functional score and morphological changes improved significantly after treatment in the C-LCCT group. However, there was no significant improvement in the TT group (p < 0.05). The C-LCCT showed significant pain, functional, and morphological improvement compared to TT. C-LCCT could be effective in improving the treatment outcomes of the traction technique in patients with cervical intervertebral disc disease.

Background/Objective: Sleep is a vital determinant of human health, where both its quantity and quality directly impact physical and mental well-being. Thermoregulation plays a pivotal role in sleep quality, as the body’s ability to regulate temperature varies across different sleep stages. This study examines the effects of a novel real-time temperature adjustment (RTA) mattress, which dynamically modulates temperature to align with sleep stage transitions, compared to constant temperature control (CTC). Through polysomnographic (PSG) assessments, this study evaluates how adaptive thermal regulation influences sleep architecture, aiming to identify its potential for optimizing restorative sleep. Methods: A prospective longitudinal cohort study involving 25 participants (13 males and 12 females; mean age: 39.7 years) evaluated sleep quality across three conditions: natural sleep (Control), CTC (33 °C constant mattress temperature), and RTA (temperature dynamically adjusted: 30 °C during REM sleep; 33 °C during non-REM sleep). Each participant completed three polysomnography (PSG) sessions. Sleep metrics, including total sleep time (TST), sleep efficiency, wake after sleep onset (WASO), and sleep stage percentages, were assessed. Repeated-measures ANOVA and post hoc analyses were performed. Results: RTA significantly improved sleep quality metrics compared to Control and CTC. TST increased from 356.2 min (Control) to 383.2 min (RTA, p = 0.030), with sleep efficiency rising from 82.8% to 87.3% (p = 0.030). WASO decreased from 58.2 min (Control) and 64.6 min (CTC) to 49.0 min (RTA, p = 0.067). REM latency was notably reduced under RTA (110.4 min) compared to Control (141.8 min, p = 0.002). The REM sleep percentage increased under RTA (20.8%, p = 0.006), with significant subgroup-specific enhancements in males (p = 0.010). Females showed significant increases in deep sleep percentage under RTA (12.3%, p = 0.011). Conclusions: Adaptive thermal regulation enhances sleep quality by aligning mattress temperature with physiological needs during different sleep stages. These findings highlight the potential of RTA as a non-invasive intervention to optimize restorative sleep and promote overall well-being. Further research could explore long-term health benefits and broader applications.

Background/Objective: Sleep is a vital determinant of human health, where both its quantity and quality directly impact physical and mental well-being. Thermoregulation plays a pivotal role in sleep quality, as the body’s ability to regulate temperature varies across different sleep stages. This study examines the effects of a novel real-time temperature adjustment (RTA) mattress, which dynamically modulates temperature to align with sleep stage transitions, compared to constant temperature control (CTC). Through polysomnographic (PSG) assessments, the study evaluates how adaptive thermal regulation influences sleep architecture, aiming to identify its potential for optimizing restorative sleep. Methods: A prospective longitudinal cohort study involving 25 participants (13 males, 12 females; mean age 39.7 years) evaluated sleep quality across three conditions: natural sleep (Control), CTC (33 °C constant mattress temperature), and RTA (temperature dynamically adjusted: 30 °C during REM sleep, 33 °C during non-REM sleep). Each participant completed three polysomnography (PSG) sessions. Sleep metrics, including total sleep time (TST), sleep efficiency, wake after sleep onset (WASO), and sleep stage percentages, were assessed. Repeated-measures ANOVA and post-hoc analyses were performed. Results: RTA significantly improved sleep quality metrics compared to Control and CTC. TST increased from 356.2 min (Control) to 383.2 min (RTA, p = 0.030), with sleep efficiency rising from 82.8% to 87.3% (p = 0.030). WASO decreased from 58.2 min (Control) and 64.6 min (CTC) to 49.0 min (RTA, p = 0.067). REM latency was notably reduced under RTA (110.4 min) compared to Control (141.8 min, p = 0.002). REM sleep percentage increased under RTA (20.8%, p = 0.006), with significant subgroup-specific enhancements in males (p = 0.010). Females showed significant increases in deep sleep percentage under RTA (12.3%, p = 0.011). Conclusions: Adaptive thermal regulation enhances sleep quality by aligning mattress temperature with physiological needs during different sleep stages. These findings highlight the potential of RTA as a non-invasive intervention to optimize restorative sleep and promote overall well-being. Further research could explore long-term health benefits and broader applications.

Background and Objectives: Adherence to positive airway pressure (PAP) is often suboptimal, and current monitoring relies on device logs that, by design, cannot detect respiratory events outside the therapy window. This creates a physiological blind spot during periods of non-usage. This study aimed to demonstrate the clinical necessity of independent, continuous monitoring using a smartphone-based home sleep apnea test (S-HSAT) by validating treatment effectiveness on adherent nights and quantifying the untreated apnea burden caused by partial adherence. Methods: We prospectively monitored 63 obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) patients commencing PAP therapy. Nightly apnea–hypopnea index (AHI) and usage time were recorded simultaneously by an S-HSAT (ApnoTrack) and the PAP device over a 30-day period. Nights were categorized by the duration discrepancy between S-HSAT and PAP (full-use, ≤5 min; intermediate-use, 5–30 min; partial-use, >30 min) using physiologically and operationally derived thresholds. Results: Final analysis included 39 participants contributing 667 nights (24 participants excluded due to non-use of one or both devices). Full-use nights (46.2%) showed close agreement between S-HSAT and PAP mean AHI (2.8 ± 4.3 vs. 2.5 ± 2.0 events/h; p = 0.13). On intermediate-use and partial-use nights (20.7% and 33.1%, respectively), substantial AHI discrepancies emerged (7.3 ± 5.5 vs. 3.8 ± 3.3 and 11.0 ± 7.4 vs. 2.8 ± 2.5 events/h, respectively; both p < 0.001). Conclusions: Independent S-HSAT monitoring quantified an untreated apnea burden that is invisible to PAP logs alone, while confirming therapeutic efficacy on well-adherent nights. These findings suggest that continuous independent monitoring may help bridge the gap between prescribed therapy and actual physiological outcomes in OSA care.