Mario Milazzo

Prof. Mario Milazzo

Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna
+1
orcid
Associate Professor

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

13Years (2014-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
6 March 2020 in Sensors
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
TCTamás Czimmerman
Tamás Czimmerman
GCGastone Ciuti
Gastone Ciuti
Mario MilazzoMario Milazzo
Mario Milazzo
MCMarcello Chiurazzi
Marcello Chiurazzi
SRStefano Roccella
Stefano Roccella
PDPaolo Dario
Paolo Dario
This paper reviews automated visual-based defect detection approaches applicable to various materials, such as metals, ceramics and textiles. In the first part of the paper, we present a general taxonomy of the different defects that fall in two classes: visible (e.g., scratches, shape error, etc.) and palpable (e.g., crack, bump, etc.) defects. Then, we describe artificial visual processing techniques that are aimed at understanding of the captured scenery in a mathematical/logical way. We continue with a survey of textural defect detection based on statistical, structural and other approaches. Finally, we report the state of the art for approaching the detection and classification of defects through supervised and non-supervised classifiers and deep learning.

10 March 2014 in Sensors
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
RCRenato Calio'
Renato Calio'
URUdaya Bhaskar Rongala
Udaya Bhaskar Rongala
DCDomenico Camboni
Domenico Camboni
Mario MilazzoMario Milazzo
Mario Milazzo
CSCesare Stefanini
Cesare Stefanini
Calogero Maria OddoCalogero Maria Oddo
Calogero Maria Oddo
This paper reviews the state of the art in piezoelectric energy harvesting. It presents the basics of piezoelectricity and discusses materials choice. The work places emphasis on material operating modes and device configurations, from resonant to non-resonant devices and also to rotational solutions. The reviewed literature is compared based on power density and bandwidth. Lastly, the question of power conversion is addressed by reviewing various circuit solutions.

8 November 2019 in Advanced Healthcare Materials
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
BABahareh Azimi
Bahareh Azimi
Mario MilazzoMario Milazzo
Mario Milazzo
Andrea LazzeriAndrea Lazzeri
Andrea Lazzeri
SBStefano Berrettini
Stefano Berrettini
MUMohammed Jasim Uddin
Mohammed Jasim Uddin
Serena DantiSerena Danti
Serena Danti

4 July 2019 in Advanced Functional Materials
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Mario MilazzoMario Milazzo
Mario Milazzo
Nicola Contessi NegriniNicola Contessi Negrini
Nicola Contessi Negrini
Stefania SciallaStefania Scialla
Stefania Scialla
BMBenedetto Marelli
Benedetto Marelli
SFSilvia Farè
Silvia Farè
MBMarkus Buehler
Markus Buehler

7 May 2015 in Biofabrication
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Carlos MotaCarlos Mota
Carlos Mota
Serena DantiSerena Danti
Serena Danti
DDDelfo D’aLessandro
Delfo D’aLessandro
LTLuisa Trombi
Luisa Trombi
CRClaudio Ricci
Claudio Ricci
SBStefano Berrettini
Stefano Berrettini
The tympanic membrane (TM) is a thin tissue able to efficiently collect and transmit sound vibrations across the middle ear thanks to the particular orientation of its collagen fibers, radiate on one side and circular on the opposite side. Through the combination of advanced scaffolds and autologous cells, tissue engineering (TE) could offer valuable alternatives to autografting in major TM lesions. In this study, a multiscale approach based on electrospinning (ES) and additive manufacturing (AM) was investigated to fabricate scaffolds, based on FDA approved copolymers, resembling the anatomic features and collagen fiber arrangement of the human TM. A single scale TM scaffold was manufactured using a custom-made collector designed to confer a radial macro-arrangement to poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) electrospun fibers during their deposition. Dual and triple scale scaffolds were fabricated combining conventional ES with AM to produce poly(ethylene oxide terephthalate)/poly(butylene terephthalate) block copolymer scaffolds with anatomic-like architecture. The processing parameters were optimized for each manufacturing method and copolymer. TM scaffolds were cultured in vitro with human mesenchymal stromal cells, which were viable, metabolically active and organized following the anisotropic character of the scaffolds. The highest viability, cell density and protein content were detected in dual and triple scale scaffolds. Our findings showed that these biomimetic micro-patterned substrates enabled cell disposal along architectural directions, thus appearing as promising substrates for developing functional TM replacements via TE.

21 December 2020 in Applied Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Pedro MorouçoPedro Morouço
Pedro Morouço
Bahareh AzimiBahareh Azimi
Bahareh Azimi
Mario MilazzoMario Milazzo
Mario Milazzo
Fatemeh MokhtariFatemeh Mokhtari
Fatemeh Mokhtari
CFCristiana Fernandes
Cristiana Fernandes
Serena DantiSerena Danti
Serena Danti
The applications of tissue engineered constructs have witnessed great advances in the last few years, as advanced fabrication techniques have enabled promising approaches to develop structures and devices for biomedical uses. (Bio-)printing, including both plain material and cell/material printing, offers remarkable advantages and versatility to produce multilateral and cell-laden tissue constructs; however, it has often revealed to be insufficient to fulfill clinical needs. Indeed, three-dimensional (3D) (bio-)printing does not provide one critical element, fundamental to mimic native live tissues, i.e., the ability to change shape/properties with time to respond to microenvironmental stimuli in a personalized manner. This capability is in charge of the so-called “smart materials”; thus, 3D (bio-)printing these biomaterials is a possible way to reach four-dimensional (4D) (bio-)printing. We present a comprehensive review on stimuli-responsive materials to produce scaffolds and constructs via additive manufacturing techniques, aiming to obtain constructs that closely mimic the dynamics of native tissues. Our work deploys the advantages and drawbacks of the mechanisms used to produce stimuli-responsive constructs, using a classification based on the target stimulus: humidity, temperature, electricity, magnetism, light, pH, among others. A deep understanding of biomaterial properties, the scaffolding technologies, and the implant site microenvironment would help the design of innovative devices suitable and valuable for many biomedical applications.