Timur Yunusov

Mr. Timur Yunusov


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

16Years (2011-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 July 2014 in IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MRMatthew Rowe
Matthew Rowe
TYTimur Yunusov
Timur Yunusov
Stephen HabenStephen Haben
Stephen Haben
CSColin Singleton
Colin Singleton
WHWilliam Holderbaum
William Holderbaum
BPBen Potter
Ben Potter
Reinforcing the Low Voltage (LV) distribution network will become essential to ensure it remains within its operating constraints as demand on the network increases. The deployment of energy storage in the distribution network provides an alternative to conventional reinforcement. This paper presents a control methodology for energy storage to reduce peak demand in a distribution network based on day-ahead demand forecasts and historical demand data. The control methodology pre-processes the forecast data prior to a planning phase to build in resilience to the inevitable errors between the forecasted and actual demand. The algorithm uses no real time adjustment so has an economical advantage over traditional storage control algorithms. Results show that peak demand on a single phase of a feeder can be reduced even when there are differences between the forecasted and the actual demand. In particular, results are presented that demonstrate when the algorithm is applied to a large number of single phase demand aggregations that it is possible to identify which of these aggregations are the most suitable candidates for the control methodology.

30 May 2014 in Energies
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MRMatthew Rowe
Matthew Rowe
TYTimur Yunusov
Timur Yunusov
Stephen HabenStephen Haben
Stephen Haben
William HolderbaumWilliam Holderbaum
William Holderbaum
BPBen Potter
Ben Potter
Energy storage is a potential alternative to conventional network reinforcement of the low voltage (LV) distribution network to ensure the grid’s infrastructure remains within its operating constraints. This paper presents a study on the control of such storage devices, owned by distribution network operators. A deterministic model predictive control (MPC) controller and a stochastic receding horizon controller (SRHC) are presented, where the objective is to achieve the greatest peak reduction in demand, for a given storage device specification, taking into account the high level of uncertainty in the prediction of LV demand. The algorithms presented in this paper are compared to a standard set-point controller and bench marked against a control algorithm with a perfect forecast. A specific case study, using storage on the LV network, is presented, and the results of each algorithm are compared. A comprehensive analysis is then carried out simulating a large number of LV networks of varying numbers of households. The results show that the performance of each algorithm is dependent on the number of aggregated households. However, on a typical aggregation, the novel SRHC algorithm presented in this paper is shown to outperform each of the comparable storage control techniques.

1 March 2016 in Applied Energy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
TYTimur Yunusov
Timur Yunusov
DFDamien Frame
Damien Frame
WHWilliam Holderbaum
William Holderbaum
BPBen Potter
Ben Potter

17 August 2016 in Energies
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MZMaximilian Zangs
Maximilian Zangs
PAPeter Adams
Peter Adams
TYTimur Yunusov
Timur Yunusov
William HolderbaumWilliam Holderbaum
William Holderbaum
BPBen Potter
Ben Potter
The future uptake of electric vehicles (EV) in low-voltage distribution networks can cause increased voltage violations and thermal overloading of network assets, especially in networks with limited headroom at times of high or peak demand. To address this problem, this paper proposes a distributed battery energy storage solution, controlled using an additive increase multiplicative decrease (AIMD) algorithm. The improved algorithm (AIMD+) uses local bus voltage measurements and a reference voltage threshold to determine the additive increase parameter and to control the charging, as well as discharging rate of the battery. The used voltage threshold is dependent on the network topology and is calculated using power flow analysis tools, with peak demand equally allocated amongst all loads. Simulations were performed on the IEEE LV European Test feeder and a number of real U.K. suburban power distribution network models, together with European demand data and a realistic electric vehicle charging model. The performance of the standard AIMD algorithm with a fixed voltage threshold and the proposed AIMD+ algorithm with the reference voltage profile are compared. Results show that, compared to the standard AIMD case, the proposed AIMD+ algorithm further improves the network’s voltage profiles, reduces thermal overload occurrences and ensures a more equal battery utilisation.

16 July 2017 in Energies
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
TYTimur Yunusov
Timur Yunusov
MZMaximilian Zangs
Maximilian Zangs
William HolderbaumWilliam Holderbaum
William Holderbaum
In the attempt to tackle the issue of climate change, governments across the world have agreed to set global carbon reduction targets.