minjeong cho

Ms. minjeong cho

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

8Years (2019-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
19 July 2019 in Symmetry
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SSSushil Kumar Singh
Sushil Kumar Singh
MSMikail Mohammed Salim
Mikail Mohammed Salim
MCminjeong cho
minjeong cho
JCJeonghun Cha
Jeonghun Cha
YPYi Pan
Yi Pan
JPJong Hyuk Park
Jong Hyuk Park
Pool hopping attack is the result of miners leaving the pool when it offers fewer financial rewards and joining back when the rewards of mining yield higher rewards in blockchain networks. This act of leaving and rejoining the pool only during the good times results in the miner receiving more rewards than the computational power they contribute. Miners exiting the pool deprive it of its collective hash power, which leaves the pool unable to mine the block successfully. This results in its competitors mining the block before they can finish mining. Existing research shows pool hopping resistant measures and detection strategies; however, they do not offer any robust preventive solution to discourage miners from leaving the mining pool. To prevent pool hopping attacks, a smart contract-based pool hopping attack prevention model is proposed. The main objective of our research is maintaining the symmetrical relationship between the miners by requiring them all to continually contribute their computational power to successfully mine a block. We implement a ledger containing records of all miners, in the form of a miner certificate, which tracks the history of the miner’s earlier behavior. The certificate enables a pool manager to better initiate terms of the smart contract, which safeguards the interests of existing mining pool members. The model prevents frequent mine hoppers from pool hopping as they submit coins in the form of an escrow and risk losing them if they abandon the pool before completing mining of the block. The key critical factors that every pool hopping attack prevention solution must address and a study of comparative analysis with existing solutions are presented in the paper.

4 November 2022 in Electronics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MCminjeong cho
minjeong cho
HEHyejin Eom
Hyejin Eom
ETErzhena Tcydenova
Erzhena Tcydenova
Changhoon LeeChanghoon Lee
Changhoon Lee
The cube attack was proposed at the 2009 Eurocrypt. The attack derives linear polynomials for specific output bits of a BlackBox cipher. Cube attacks target recovery keys or secret states. In this paper, we present a cube attack on a 5-round Sycon permutation and a 6-round Sycon permutation with a 320-bit state, whose rate occupies 96 bits, and whose capacity is 224 bits. We found cube variables related to a superpoly with a secret state. Within the cube variables, we recovered 32 bits of the secret state. The target algorithm was Sycon with 5-round and 6-round versions of permutation. For the 5-round Sycon, we found a cube variable and recovered a state with a total of 2192 Sycon computations and 237 bits of memory. For the 6-round Sycon, we found cube variables and recovered a state with a total of 2192 Sycon computations and 270 bits of memory. When using brute force in a 5-round attack, 2224 operations were required, but the cube attack proposed in this paper had 248 offline operations, and 232 operations were required. When using brute force in a 6-round attack, 2224 operations were required, but the cube attack proposed in this paper required 295 offline operations, and 263 operations were required. For both attacks, offline could be used continuously after performing only once. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first cube attack on Sycon.