Rick Assendelft

Mr. Rick Assendelft

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

14Years (2013-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
3 September 2014 in Hydrological Processes
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
DPDaniele Penna
Daniele Penna
IMIlja Van Meerveld
Ilja Van Meerveld
OOO. Oliviero
O. Oliviero
GZGiulia Zuecco
Giulia Zuecco
RARick Assendelft
Rick Assendelft
MBMarco Borga
Marco Borga

27 November 2019 in Hydrology and Earth System Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
IMIlja Van Meerveld
Ilja Van Meerveld
JKJames W. Kirchner
James W. Kirchner
MVMarc Vis
Marc Vis
RARick Assendelft
Rick Assendelft
JSJan Seibert
Jan Seibert
Flowing stream networks dynamically extend and retract, both seasonally and in response to precipitation events. These network dynamics can dramatically alter the drainage density and thus the length of subsurface flow pathways to flowing streams. We mapped flowing stream networks in a small Swiss headwater catchment during different wetness conditions and estimated their effects on the distribution of travel times to the catchment outlet. For each point in the catchment, we determined the subsurface transport distance to the flowing stream based on the surface topography and determined the surface transport distance along the flowing stream to the outlet. We combined the distributions of these travel distances with assumed surface and subsurface flow velocities to estimate the distribution of travel times to the outlet. These calculations show that the extension and retraction of the stream network can substantially change the mean travel time and the shape of the travel time distribution. During wet conditions with a fully extended flowing stream network, the travel time distribution was strongly skewed to short travel times, but as the network retracted during dry conditions, the distribution of the travel times became more uniform. Stream network dynamics are widely ignored in catchment models, but our results show that they need to be taken into account when modeling solute transport and interpreting travel time distributions.

25 October 2019 in Sensors
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
RARick Assendelft
Rick Assendelft
IMIlja Van Meerveld
Ilja Van Meerveld
While temporary streams account for more than half of the global discharge, high spatiotemporal resolution data on the three main hydrological states (dry streambed, standing water, and flowing water) of temporary stream remains sparse. This study presents a low-cost, multi-sensor system to monitor the hydrological state of temporary streams in mountainous headwaters. The monitoring system consists of an Arduino microcontroller board combined with an SD-card data logger shield, and four sensors: an electrical resistance (ER) sensor, temperature sensor, float switch sensor, and flow sensor. The monitoring system was tested in a small mountainous headwater catchment, where it was installed on multiple locations in the stream network, during two field seasons (2016 and 2017). Time-lapse cameras were installed at all monitoring system locations to evaluate the sensor performance. The field tests showed that the monitoring system was power efficient (running for nine months on four AA batteries at a five-minute logging interval) and able to reliably log data (<1% failed data logs). Of the sensors, the ER sensor (99.9% correct state data and 90.9% correctly timed state changes) and flow sensor (99.9% correct state data and 90.5% correctly timed state changes) performed best (2017 performance results). A setup of the monitoring system with these sensors can provide long-term, high spatiotemporal resolution data on the hydrological state of temporary streams, which will help to improve our understanding of the hydrological functioning of these important systems.

1 January 2013 in Procedia Environmental Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
DPDaniele Penna
Daniele Penna
OOOmar Oliviero
Omar Oliviero
RARick Assendelft
Rick Assendelft
GZGiulia Zuecco
Giulia Zuecco
IMIlja (H. J.) van Meerveld
Ilja (H. J.) van Meerveld
GFGiancarlo Dalla Fontana
Giancarlo Dalla Fontana

4 June 2013 in The Holocene
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
NBNils Broothaerts
Nils Broothaerts
GVGert Verstraeten
Gert Verstraeten
BNBastiaan Notebaert
Bastiaan Notebaert
RARick Assendelft
Rick Assendelft
CKCornelis Kasse
Cornelis Kasse
Jef VandenbergheJef Vandenberghe
Jef Vandenberghe
Floodplain deposition rates have increased markedly under influence of human impact throughout the late Holocene in many western and central European catchments. Consequently the geomorphology and ecology of many floodplains changed. In this study we discuss this human impact and its influence on the floodplain geoecology during the middle and late Holocene for the headwaters of the Dijle catchment, located in the Belgian loess belt. The floodplain geoecology and the regional vegetation was reconstructed from sedimentological and palynological analyses. An age–depth model for the studied sequences was obtained using 17 radiocarbon dates. Statistical analyses of the pollen data (cluster analysis and canonical correspondence analysis) were used to detect changes in the pollen record. Our data show that until c. 2500 cal. BP, human impact was nearly absent or localized with no discernible influence on the floodplain geoecology. The floodplain was in a stable phase and consisted of a marshy environment where organic material could accumulate, which is interpreted as the natural state of the floodplain. From c. 2500 cal. BP onwards, human impact gradually increased. However, only when human impact in the catchment crossed a threshold around 500 cal. BP, the floodplain geoecology changed with clearing of the Alder carr forest, the establishment of a single channel river and the dominance of minerogenic overbank sedimentation. Spatial variability in the coupling between increasing human impact and changes in floodplain geoecology can be attributed to differences in hillslope–floodplain connectivity and local differences in human impact.

15 May 2019 in EGUsphere
Verified
Preprint
Open access
PDF file
IMIlja Van Meerveld
Ilja Van Meerveld
JKJames W. Kirchner
James W. Kirchner
MVMarc Vis
Marc Vis
RARick Assendelft
Rick Assendelft
JSJan Seibert
Jan Seibert
Flowing stream networks dynamically extend and retract, both seasonally and in response to precipitation events. These network dynamics can dramatically alter the drainage density, and thus the length of subsurface flow pathways to flowing streams. We mapped flowing stream networks in a small Swiss headwater catchment during different wetness conditions and estimated their effects on the distribution of travel times to the catchment outlet. For each point in the catchment, we determined the subsurface transport distance to the flowing stream based on the surface topography, and the surface transport distance along the flowing stream to the outlet. We combined the distributions of these travel distances with assumed surface and subsurface flow velocities to estimate the distribution of travel times to the outlet. These calculations show that the extension and retraction of the stream network can substantially change the mean travel time and the shape of the travel time distribution. During wet conditions with a fully extended flowing stream network, the travel time distribution was strongly skewed to short travel times, but as the network retracted during dry conditions, the distribution of the travel times became more uniform. Stream network dynamics are widely ignored in catchment models, but our results show that they need to be taken into account when modeling solute transport and interpreting travel time distributions.