Objectives: Antacid medications are frequently administered to preterm infants. These medications can change gastric pH levels and can affect regular gastrointestinal function and gut micro-bacterial flora. We hypothesized that preterm infants exposed to antacid medications are at a greater risk of necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) and sepsis, and set out to determine any association, as well as to assess the clinical efficacy of these medications.Materials and methods: Retrospective chart review of preterm infants ≤30 weeks’ gestational age or birth weight ≤1250 g over a 2-year period at New York University Langone Medical Center. Subjects were divided into two groups: those who had been treated with antacid medications and those who had not. We then examined for any difference in NEC (≥Bell stage 2) or culture proven sepsis.Results: The study comprised 65 eligible neonates, 28 in antacid treatment group and 37 in control. The incidence of NEC (21.4% vs. 2.7%, P=0.04) was significantly higher in the antacid group, but these infants tended to be born more prematurely than control subjects. There was a trend toward more culture proven sepsis cases in the antacid group. We found no difference in signs generally associated with neonatal reflux (apnea, bradycardia, and desaturation events) in subjects treated with antacid medications after treatment began.Conclusions: Treatment of preterm infants with antacid medications is potentially associated with a higher risk of NEC, and possibly sepsis, while appearing to provide little benefit.

Objective: To compare the electrical activity of the diaphragm (Edi) of premature infants placed on continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) with the Edi of premature infants placed on noninvasive neurally adjusted ventilatory assist (NIV NAVA). The secondary aim was to evaluate the feasibility of the use of NIV NAVA mode in the busy tertiary neonatal unit. Study Design: This was a prospective crossover pilot study of premature infants requiring noninvasive respiratory support. Infants were randomized to initially receive either CPAP/biphasic (group 1) or NIV NAVA (group 2) and were then crossed over to the alternate group. Continuous Edi signals were recorded for 24 h, with 12 h each on CPAP/biphasic, and NIV NAVA along with other clinical and respiratory parameters. Results: Ten infants with a mean gestation age of 29 weeks (range 25-34 weeks) were enrolled, with a total cumulative Edi monitoring of 240 h. The average Edi peak on the biphasic/CPAP group (15.6 ± 7 mcV) was significantly higher (P < 0.005), compared to the Edi Peak on the NIV NAVA group (10.8 ± 3.3 mcV). The Edi min values were 3.23 ± 1.1 mcV, and 3.07 ± 0.5 mcV on CPAP/biphasic and NIV NAVA (P = 0.69) respectively. There were no significant differences in other clinical parameters between the two groups. No major adverse events were recorded during Edi catheter monitoring. Conclusion: The Edi peak values were significantly lower in NIV NAVA mode compared to CPAP/biphasic mode. The Edi catheter and NIV NAVA may also be used safely in premature infants.

Background: Evaluation of newborns for hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy (HIE) includes laboratory and clinical parameters, as well as amplitude integrated electroencephalogram (aEEG). Based on qualifying criteria, selective head cooling (SHC) is initiated for infants with evidence of moderate to severe HIE. However, some newborns may not qualify for hypothermia therapy based on normal aEEG.Objective: To compare levels of serum glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), ubiquitin c-terminal hydrolase-1 (UCHL-1) protein and phosphorylated axonal neurofilament heavy chain (pNF-H), in newborns who met initial screening criteria for HIE but did not qualify for head cooling, to the levels in healthy newborns.Study design: Newborns ≥36 weeks of gestational age at risk for HIE, who were evaluated but did not qualify for SHC from July 2013 through June 2014 at NYU Langone Medical Center and Bellevue Hospital center were enrolled. A control group included healthy newborns from the newborn nursery (NBN). Serum samples were collected between 24 and 48 h of life from both groups.Results: There was no significant difference in the serum levels of GFAP, UCHL-1 protein and pNF-H between the two groups of infants.Conclusion: Newborns at risk for HIE who met the initial criteria for head cooling but who were excluded based on normal aEEG did not show significant elevation of biomarkers of brain injury compared to healthy newborns. These findings may help to validate using aEEG as an additional evaluation criteria in cooling.