This paper presents results of ultrasonic non-destructive testing of carbon fibre-reinforced plastics (CFRPs) and glass-fibre reinforced plastics (GFRPs). First, ultrasonic C-scan analysis was used to detect real defects inside the composite materials. Next, the composite materials were subjected to drilling in the area of defect formation, and measured forces were used to analyse the drilling process using recurrence methods. Results have confirmed that recurrence methods can be used to detect defects formed inside a composite material during machining.

The paper analyses the impact of mechanical milling pre-treatment parameters on adhesive joint strength. Comparison of surface roughness of adherends after milling and its effect on adhesive joint strength is analysed in strength tests. The tests were performed on C45 structural steel specimens, which were subjected to machining at different parameters, with two types of milling cutters. Adherends were degreased prior to adhesive joining. Two types of end mills used in tests were NFPaφ20 high-speed steel cutter and R390-020B20-11L indexable milling cutter. The machining was carried out at three cutting speeds: 0.05, 0.15 and 0.30 mm/tooth. Adherends were joined with an adhesive composition of Epidian 57 epoxy resin and Z-1 curing agent.

This paper presents the results of an experimental study on the impact of slide burnishing on surface roughness parameters (Sa, Sz, Sp, Sv, Ssk, and Sku), topography, surface layer microhardness, residual stress, and mean positron lifetime (τ_mean). In the study, specimens of X6CrNiTi18 stainless steel were subjected to slide burnishing. The experimental variables were feed and slide burnishing force. The slide burnishing process led to changes in the surface structure and residual stress distribution and increased the surface layer microhardness. After slide burnishing, the analyzed roughness parameters decreased compared with their pre-treatment (grinding) values. The slide burnishing of X6CrNiTi18 steel specimens increased their degree of strengthening e from 8.77% to 42.74%, while the hardened layer thickness g_h increased after the treatment from about 10 µm to 100 µm. The maximum compressive residual stress was about 450 MPa, and the maximum depth of compressive residual stresses was g_σ = 1.1 mm. The positron mean lifetime τ_mean slightly yet systematically increased with the increase in burnishing force F, while an increase in feed led to changes of a different nature.

This study investigated the effect of the different surface treatment methods on the strength of Ti6Al4V titanium alloy sheet adhesive joints. The following surface treatment methods were used: alkaline degreasing, anodizing, vibratory shot peening, and anodizing with vibrational shot peening. The following tests/measurements were carried out during the experiment: surface roughness measurements; microhardness measurements (conducted by the Vickers hardness test method); and strength tests of single-lap adhesive joints fabricated with the use of two epoxy adhesives, rigid and flexible, both based on epoxy resin Epidian 5. It has been found that the application of anodizing followed by vibratory shot peening leads to increased strength of adhesive joints, irrespective of the type of applied epoxy adhesive.

This paper presents the results of research on the impact of finishing method on surface topography, surface roughness (parameters Ra, Rt, Rpk, Rk, Rvk), surface layer microhardness, residual stresses and fatigue life. Ring samples made of C45 steel were used to conduct the experiments. The following finishing machining methods were selected: slide burnishing, ball burnishing, centrifugal shot peening, centrifugal shot peening + slide burnishing and centrifugal shot peening + ball burnishing. In the first stage, the use of combined shot peening + burnishing enables microhardness to be increased on the surface layer, the values of residual stresses to be increased and the creation of characteristic machining traces on the surface, the so-called “dimples” (effect of centrifugal shot peening). On the other hand, burnishing (slide burnishing or ball burnishing) is aimed at smoothing the surface and providing favorable stereometric properties to the surface layer. It was noted that, after finishing, the surface roughness parameters decreased from 59% to 83% in relation to the reference surface. The exception is the centrifugal shot peening technology. The use of burnishing (slide or ball burnishing) after centrifugal shot peening reduces the surface roughness parameters by a maximum of 82% compared to the value after centrifugal shot peening. The highest increase in microhardness was obtained after centrifugal shot peening + slide burnishing (ΔHV = 105 HV 0.05), while the highest thickness g_h (g_h = 120 μm) was obtained after centrifugal shot peening + ball burnishing. The combination of centrifugal shot peening and ball burnishing results in the highest absolute value of compressive residual stresses σ_max = 602 MPa and depth g_σ = 0.41 mm). Application of an additional operation after centrifugal shot peening increases fatigue life from 27% to 49%. ANOVA analysis of variance confirms the significance of the processing effect of centrifugal shot peening combined with slide burnishing (CSP + SB) and centrifugal shot peening + ball burnishing (CSP + BB) on the analyzed dependent surface.

This paper presents the experimental results of a study investigating the impact of the machining fluid type, the variable factor, used in slide burnishing on 2D and 3D surface roughness; surface topography; Abbott–Firestone curve shape; microhardness; and SFE (surface free energy). In the experiment, pre-ground, ringed samples of C45 steel were used. The results showed an over eight-fold decrease in the value of the Ra (arithmetical mean deviation) parameter and over a five-fold decrease in the Rt (total height of profile) parameter in relation to their values after grinding. The parameters Rpk (reduced peak height), Rk (core roughness depth), and Rvk (reduced valley depth) were also reduced. The Abbott–Firestone curve after slide burnishing changed its angle of inclination (it was more flattened), and the material ratio Smr increased. The reduction in the Rpk and Rk parameters and increased material ratio will most likely contribute to restoring the functionality of these surfaces (increased resistance to abrasive wear). After slide burnishing, the maximum 25% increase in microhardness was obtained compared to the value after grinding, while the layer thickness was 20 μm. The surface energy of elements subjected to slide burnishing using various machining fluids slightly increased, or its value was close to that of the ground surface. The most favourable properties of the surface layer in terms of mating between two elements were obtained for a part that was slide-burnished with a mixture of oil + polymethyl methacrylate (PMM) + molybdenum disulphide (MoS₂).