Pedro L. Cruz

Dr. Pedro L. Cruz

1. Low Carbon & Resource Efficiency, R&Di, Instituto de Soldadura e Qualidade, 4415-491 Grijó, Portugal
+1
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

10Years (2017-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 January 2019 in Fuel
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ZNZaira Navas-Anguita
Zaira Navas-Anguita
PCPedro L. Cruz
Pedro L. Cruz
Mario Martin-GamboaMario Martin-Gamboa
Mario Martin-Gamboa
Diego IribarrenDiego Iribarren
Diego Iribarren
JDJavier Dufour
Javier Dufour

20 November 2020 in Energies
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Miguel Castro OliveiraMiguel Castro Oliveira
Miguel Castro Oliveira
Muriel ItenMuriel Iten
Muriel Iten
PCPedro L. Cruz
Pedro L. Cruz
HMHelena Monteiro
Helena Monteiro
Thermal processes represent a considerable part of the total energy consumption in manufacturing industry, in sectors such as steel, aluminium, cement, ceramic and glass, among others. It can even be the predominant type of energy consumption in some sectors. High thermal energy processes are mostly associated to high thermal losses, (commonly denominated as waste heat), reinforcing the need for waste heat recovery (WHR) strategies. WHR has therefore been identified as a relevant solution to increase energy efficiency in industrial thermal applications, namely in energy intensive consumers. The ceramic sector is a clear example within the manufacturing industry mainly due to the fuel consumption required for the following processes: firing, drying and spray drying. This paper reviews studies on energy efficiency improvement measures including WHR practices applied to the ceramic sector. This focuses on technologies and strategies which have significant potential to promote energy savings and carbon emissions reduction. The measures have been grouped into three main categories: (i) equipment level; (ii) plant level; and (iii) outer plant level. Some examples include: (i) high efficiency burners; (ii) hot air recycling from kilns to other processes and installation of heat exchangers; and (iii) installation of gas turbine for combined heat and power (CHP). It is observed that energy efficiency solutions allow savings up to 50–60% in the case of high efficiency burners; 15% energy savings for hot air recycling solutions and 30% in the when gas turbines are considered for CHP. Limitations to the implementation of some measures have been identified such as the high investment costs associated, for instance, with certain heat exchangers as well as the corrosive nature of certain available exhaust heat.

1 June 2018 in International Journal of Hydrogen Energy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PCPedro L. Cruz
Pedro L. Cruz
ZNZaira Navas-Anguita
Zaira Navas-Anguita
Diego IribarrenDiego Iribarren
Diego Iribarren
JDJavier Dufour
Javier Dufour


1 March 2022 in Journal of Cleaner Production
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
HMHelena Monteiro
Helena Monteiro
PCPedro L. Cruz
Pedro L. Cruz
Bruna MouraBruna Moura
Bruna Moura

1 May 2017 in Fuel
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PCPedro L. Cruz
Pedro L. Cruz
EMEsperanza Montero
Esperanza Montero
JDJavier Dufour
Javier Dufour