Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) is not only related to traditional cardiovascular risk factors like type 2 diabetes mellitus and obesity, but it is also an independent risk factor for the development of cardiovascular disease. MASLD has been shown to be independently related to endothelial dysfunction and atherosclerosis. MASLD is characterized by a chronic proinflammatory response that, in turn, may induce a prothrombotic state. Several mechanisms such as endothelial and platelet dysfunction, changes in the coagulative factors, lower fibrinolytic activity can contribute to induce the prothrombotic state. Platelets are players and addresses of metabolic dysregulation; obesity and insulin resistance are related to platelet hyperactivation. Furthermore, platelets can exert a direct effect on liver cells, particularly through the release of mediators from granules. Growing data in literature support the use of antiplatelet agent as a treatment for MASLD. The use of antiplatelets drugs seems to exert beneficial effects on hepatocellular carcinoma prevention in patients with MASLD, since platelets contribute to fibrosis progression and cancer development. This review aims to summarize the main data on the role of platelets in the pathogenesis of MASLD and its main complications such as cardiovascular events and the development of liver fibrosis. Furthermore, we will examine the role of antiplatelet therapy not only in the prevention and treatment of cardiovascular events but also as a possible anti-fibrotic and anti-tumor agent.

Background: Peripheral artery disease (PAD) is still the least studied and evaluated form in clinical practice among atherosclerotic pathologies, despite the increased mortality and comorbidities related to it. The relationship between steatotic liver disease and an increased risk of cardiovascular disease has been extensively documented. Methods: The purpose of this work is to perform a review of the evidence linking NAFLD or MASLD to PAD, and examine possible clinical scenarios that arise from this new terminology. Results: The new definition of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) includes the presence of cardiometabolic risk factors and hepatic steatosis without any other underlying causes of hepatic steatosis; this terminology, coined in the hepatological field, could generate confusion, especially in the initial stages of its diffusion and among different medical specialists. Conclusions: Some recent data in the literature have strengthened the evidence of a pathological link between hepatic metabolic alteration (NAFLD or MAFLD) and PAD.

Sodium–glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2is) and GLP-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) are now established as cornerstone therapies for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), given their cardiovascular and renal protective properties. However, their use in patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD) remains controversial due to concerns raised in early trials about potential increases in lower limb complications, particularly amputations. This narrative review examines current evidence on the association between SGLT2is and GLP-1 RAs in PAD-related outcomes, including limb events, amputation risk, and cardiovascular and renal endpoints. Drawing from randomized controlled trials, real-world cohort studies, and systematic reviews, we provide an integrated perspective on the safety and utility of SGLT2is and GLP-1 RAs in individuals with PAD, highlight patient selection considerations, and identify areas for future investigation.

Background and Objectives: The clinical relevance of “corona phlebectatica” and the management of risk factors for recurrence of venous ulcers in patients with chronic venous disease may be variable based on vascular specialists in different geographical areas of Italy. The aim of the present survey is to evaluate the management of patients with chronic venous disease by vascular specialists in different areas of the national territory. In particular, this involves ascertaining the clinical/prognostic relevance attributed to the presence of the “corona phlebectatica” as well as to the management of risk factors related to recurrence of venous ulcers. Materials and Methods: The web-based survey aimed at vascular medicine specialists with particular interest in venous disease. A questionnaire was developed, based on 12 questions, in relation to clinical assessment, risk factor management, and therapy in patients with chronic venous disease. Results: Almost all of the specialists involved actively participated in the survey, declaring that they personally manage chronic venous disease overall. There was a strong agreement in the prognostic consideration attributed to the presence of “corona phlebectatica” and to the management of risk factors for venous ulcer recurrence, regardless of the different geographical areas of interest. Conclusions: Accordingly with the results of this self-assessment survey, the skills and experience of the specialists involved appear to be of a good standard, both in the clinical evaluation and in the management of the progression of chronic venous disease. However, the need to reach more cultural insights into the correlations between chronic venous disease and risk factors correlated with disease progression emerges. Moreover, there was the need for a greater and tighter overall clinical control of a patient with chronic venous disease, also in relation to the presence of comorbidities.

Background: Telemedicine is increasingly used in several fields of healthcare, including vascular medicine. This study aimed to investigate the views of experts and propose clinical practice recommendations on the possible applications of telemedicine in vascular medicine. Methods: A clinical guidance group proposed a set of 67 clinical practice recommendations based on the synthesis of current evidence and expert opinion. The Telemedicine Vascular Medicine Working Group included 32 experts from Europe evaluating the appropriateness of each clinical practice recommendation based on published RAND/UCLA methodology in two rounds. Results: In the first round, 60.9% of clinical practice recommendations were rated as appropriate, 35.9% as uncertain, and 3.1% as inappropriate. The strongest agreement (a median value of 10) was reached on statements regarding the usefulness of telemedicine during the 2019 coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic, its usefulness for geographical areas that are difficult to access, and the superiority of video calls compared to phone calls only. The lowest degree of agreement (a median value of 2) was reported on statements regarding the utility of telemedicine being limited to the COVID-19 pandemic and regarding the applicability of teleconsultation in the diagnosis and management of abdominal aortic aneurysm. In the second round, 11 statements were re-evaluated to reduce variability. Conclusions: This study highlights the levels of agreement and the points that raise concern on the use of telemedicine in vascular medicine. It emphasizes the need for further clarification on various issues, including infrastructure, logistics, and legislation.

Background: Internal jugular vein thrombosis (IJVT) is a rare but serious complication in hospitalized patients, often associated with central venous access devices (CVADs). The primary objective of the study was to analyze the clinical characteristics of patients with newly diagnosed IJVT, in particular to evaluate mortality, development of pulmonary embolism and incidence of bleeding at 30 days from diagnosis. Secondly, a sub-analysis was performed between patients with device-related and non-device-related thrombosis. Methods: Prospective study on adult inpatients diagnosed with IJVT from January to December 2024. Data on demographics, comorbidities, device use, laboratory values at diagnosis (D-dimer, platelet count, C-reactive protein (CRP), liver/renal function), treatment, and outcomes (mortality, pulmonary embolism, bleeding) were collected. Results: Thirty-one patients with IJVT were included. Mean age was 71.0 ± 13.2 years; 54.8% female; 35.5% had CVADs (central venous catheter (CVC) 36.4%, midlines 36.4%, peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) 27.2%). Device-associated IJVT patients exhibited lower D-dimer (2.1 ± 0.5 vs. 3.6 ± 0.8 µg/mL; p = 0.018), higher platelet counts (249.0 ± 86.7 vs. 184.3 ± 53.6 × 10⁹/L; p = 0.044), and elevated CRP (12.5 ± 9.2 vs. 5.1 ± 5.6 mg/L; p = 0.033). Overall mortality was 16.1%; pulmonary embolism occurred in 16.1% and bleeding in 6.5%. CVAD use was not independently associated with adverse outcomes. Conclusions: IJVT presents with distinct biomarker profiles when associated with CVADs, characterized by lower systemic fibrinolysis and heightened inflammation. Recognition of these differences may refine diagnostic thresholds and guide prophylactic strategies. Larger prospective studies are warranted.