Paul Hebinck

Dr. Paul Hebinck

1. Wageningen University/Department of Sociology of Development and Change, The Netherlands
+1

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

22Years (2005-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 April 2015 in Landscape and Urban Planning
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Sheona E. ShackletonSheona E. Shackleton
Sheona E. Shackleton
ACAbby Chinyimba
Abby Chinyimba
Paul HebinckPaul Hebinck
Paul Hebinck
Charlie ShackletonCharlie Shackleton
Charlie Shackleton
HKHumphrey Kaoma
Humphrey Kaoma

1 January 2018 in Ecology and Society
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
AHAniek Hebinck
Aniek Hebinck
JVJoost M. Vervoort
Joost M. Vervoort
Paul HebinckPaul Hebinck
Paul Hebinck
LRLucas Rutting
Lucas Rutting
FGFrancesca Galli
Francesca Galli
Hebinck, A., J. M. Vervoort, P. Hebinck, L. Rutting, and F. Galli. 2018. Imagining transformative futures: participatory foresight for food systems change. Ecology and Society 23(2):16. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-10054-230216

1 January 2008 in Ecology and Society
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
KGKen E Giller
Ken E Giller
CLCees Leeuwis
Cees Leeuwis
JAJens A. Andersson
Jens A. Andersson
WAWim Andriesse
Wim Andriesse
ABArie Brouwer
Arie Brouwer
PWPieter Windmeijer
Pieter Windmeijer
Competing claims on natural resources become increasingly acute, with the poor being most vulnerable to adverse outcomes of such competition. A major challenge for science and policy is to progress from facilitating univocal use to guiding stakeholders in dealing with potentially conflicting uses of natural resources. The development of novel, more equitable, management options that reduce rural poverty is key to achieving sustainable use of natural resources and the resolution of conflicts over them. Here, we describe an interdisciplinary and interactive approach for: (i) the understanding of competing claims and stakeholder objectives; (ii) the identification of alternative resource use options, and (iii) the scientific support to negotiation processes between stakeholders. Central to the outlined approach is a shifted perspective on the role of scientific knowledge in society. Understanding scientific knowledge as entering societal arenas and as fundamentally negotiated, the role of the scientist becomes a more modest one, a contributor to ongoing negotiation processes among stakeholders. Scientists can, therefore, not merely describe and explain resource-use dynamics and competing claims, but in doing so, they should actively contribute to negotiation processes between stakeholders operating at different scales (local, national, regional, and global). Together with stakeholders, they explore alternatives that can contribute to more sustainable and equitable use of natural resources and, where possible, design new technical options and institutional arrangements

1 May 2007 in Agricultural Systems
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
EKEvelyne Kiptot
Evelyne Kiptot
Paul HebinckPaul Hebinck
Paul Hebinck
SFSteven Franzel
Steven Franzel
PRPaul Richards
Paul Richards

25 August 2006 in Agroforestry Systems
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
EKEvelyne Kiptot
Evelyne Kiptot
SFSteven Franzel
Steven Franzel
Paul HebinckPaul Hebinck
Paul Hebinck
PRPaul Richards
Paul Richards

1 March 2019 in Land Use Policy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Charlie ShackletonCharlie Shackleton
Charlie Shackleton
PMPenny Mograbi
Penny Mograbi
SDS. Drimie
S. Drimie
DFD. Fay
D. Fay
Paul HebinckPaul Hebinck
Paul Hebinck
WTWayne Twine
Wayne Twine