Peter Mansell

Prof. Peter Mansell

Melbourne Veterinary School, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

36Years (1991-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 October 2016 in Research in Veterinary Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JAJosh Aleri
Josh Aleri
BHB.C. Hine
B.C. Hine
MPM.F. Pyman
M.F. Pyman
PMPeter Mansell
Peter Mansell
WWW.J. Wales
W.J. Wales
AFA.D. Fisher
A.D. Fisher

1 May 2001 in Journal of Dairy Science
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
PPP. Phuektes
P. Phuektes
PMPeter Mansell
Peter Mansell
Glenn BrowningGlenn Browning
Glenn Browning
To improve diagnosis of mastitis in dairy cattle, a multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay was developed for the simultaneous detection of the four major bacterial causes of bovine mastitis, Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus agalactiae, Streptococcus dysgalactiae, and Streptococcus uberis. The target sequence was the 16S to 23S rRNA spacer regions. The performance of the assay was examined with 117 milk samples collected from a subclinically infected herd, and the diagnostic specificities and sensitivities of the multiplex PCR were compared with conventional culture. PCR was significantly more sensitive than culture for detection of S. aureus and S. uberis, but there were no significant differences in sensitivities between PCR and culture for the detection of S. agalactiae and S. dysgalactiae. The results suggest that this multiplex PCR assay could be used as an alternative method in routine diagnosis for rapid, sensitive, and specific simultaneous detection of S. aureus, S. agalactiae, S. dysgalactiae, and S. uberis in milk samples.

1 April 2001 in Journal of Clinical Microbiology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
PPPatchara Phuektes
Patchara Phuektes
PMPeter Mansell
Peter Mansell
RDRodney S. Dyson
Rodney S. Dyson
NHNarelle D. Hooper
Narelle D. Hooper
JDJennifer S. Dick
Jennifer S. Dick
Glenn BrowningGlenn Browning
Glenn Browning
Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis and antimicrobial sensitivity testing were used as tools to investigate the epidemiology ofStreptococcus uberismastitis in dairy cows. A total of 62 different strains were found among 138 isolates from the four herds investigated, and between 10 and 26 different strains were found in each herd. There was no strain common to all four herds. Identical strains ofS. uberiswere detected from different quarters of individual cows and from cows within the same herd, suggesting that transmission from quarter to quarter and cow to cow had occurred. Despite the great variation inS. uberisstrains, persistent infection with the same strain within a lactation was observed in most cows. Predominant strains were present in two herds. Preliminary investigations could not clarify why these particular strains might predominate, but in one herd there was a significant difference between the prevalence of clinical mastitis in quarters infected with the predominant strain and that in quarters infected with other strains, suggesting the greater virulence of the predominant strain. The wide variety ofS. uberisstrains found is consistent with an environmental source ofS. uberis. However, evidence of direct transmission, the persistence of infection, and the predominance of particular strains in some herds indicate thatS. uberisinfections are epidemiologically complex and that the relative importance of these factors in the occurrence of mastitis may differ between herds.

1 May 2018 in Veterinary Microbiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
FMFilimon Mitiku
Filimon Mitiku
CHCarol A. Hartley
Carol A. Hartley
FSFiona M. Sansom
Fiona M. Sansom
JCJoanne E. Coombe
Joanne E. Coombe
PMPeter Mansell
Peter Mansell
Glenn BrowningGlenn Browning
Glenn Browning

1 July 2013 in Journal of Dairy Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
RDR.A. Dickinson
R.A. Dickinson
JMJ.M. Morton
J.M. Morton
DBDavid Beggs
David Beggs
GAG.A. Anderson
G.A. Anderson
MPM.F. Pyman
M.F. Pyman
CBC.B. Blackwood
C.B. Blackwood
Automated walk-over weighing systems can be used to monitor liveweights of cattle. Minimal literature exists to describe agreement between automated and static scales, and no known studies describe repeatability when used for daily measurements of dairy cows. This study establishes the repeatability of an automated walk-over cattle-weighing system, and agreement with static electronic scales, when used in a commercial dairy herd to weigh lactating cows. Forty-six lactating dairy cows from a seasonal calving, pasture-based dairy herd in southwest Victoria, Australia, were weighed once using a set of static scales and repeatedly using an automated walk-over weighing system at the exit of a rotary dairy. Substantial agreement was observed between the automated and static scales when assessed using Lin's concordance correlation coefficient. Weights measured by the automated walkover scales were within 5% of those measured by the static scales in 96% of weighings. Bland and Altman's 95% limits of agreement were -23.3 to 43.6 kg, a range of 66.9 kg. The 95% repeatability coefficient for automated weighings was 46.3 kg. Removal of a single outlier from the data set increased Lin's concordance coefficient, narrowed Bland and Altman's 95% limits of agreement to a range of 32.5 kg, and reduced the 95% repeatability coefficient to 18.7 kg. Cow misbehavior during walk-over weighing accounted for many of the larger weight discrepancies. The automated walk-over weighing system showed substantial agreement with the static scales when assessed using Lin's concordance correlation coefficient. This contrasted with limited agreement when assessed using Bland and Altman's method, largely due to poor repeatability. This suggests the automated weighing system is inadequate for detecting small liveweight differences in individual cows based on comparisons of single weights. Misbehaviors and other factors can result in the recording of spurious values on walk-over scales. Excluding outlier weights and comparing means of 7 consecutive daily weights may improve agreement sufficiently to allow meaningful assessment of small short-term changes in automated weights in individuals and groups of cows.

1 June 2021 in Journal of Dairy Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
NRNatalie Roadknight
Natalie Roadknight
PMPeter Mansell
Peter Mansell
EJEllen Jongman
Ellen Jongman
NCNatalie Courtman
Natalie Courtman
AFAndrew Fisher
Andrew Fisher
The transport of young calves is a welfare concern. Young calves aged ≤3 mo are particularly vulnerable to compromised welfare, and are at a relatively high risk of morbidity and mortality compared with adult cattle. Calves face several potential challenges to welfare during and after transport, including food and water deprivation, disease, injury, and stress from handling, social mixing, and new environments. The key risk factors identified for poor calf welfare associated with transport include long transport and fasting durations, young age at transport, poor colostral immunity, timing within the calving season, lack of bedding in trucks, and high stocking density. Maximizing calf welfare thus requires a multifaceted approach, such as minimizing transport and fasting durations, transporting at an appropriate stocking density with comfortable bedding, only transporting calves that are healthy and fit, and optimizing pre-transport calf management. More research is needed to understand the effect of transport on the mental or affective state of calves.