Maciej Galiński

Dr. Maciej Galiński

Poznan University of Technology
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

32Years (1995-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 August 2006 in Electrochimica Acta
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MGMaciej Galiński
Maciej Galiński
ALAndrzej Lewandowski
Andrzej Lewandowski
ISIzabela Stępniak
Izabela Stępniak

1 September 2010 in Journal of Power Sources
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ALAndrzej Lewandowski
Andrzej Lewandowski
AOAngelika Olejniczak
Angelika Olejniczak
MGMaciej Galiński
Maciej Galiński
ISIzabela Stępniak
Izabela Stępniak

1 March 2004 in Journal of Physics and Chemistry of Solids
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ALA Lewandowski
A Lewandowski
MGMaciej Galiński
Maciej Galiński

1 November 2007 in Journal of Power Sources
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ALAndrzej Lewandowski
Andrzej Lewandowski
MGMaciej Galiński
Maciej Galiński

22 March 2013 in Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
ALAndrzej Lewandowski
Andrzej Lewandowski
PJPawel Jakobczyk
Pawel Jakobczyk
MGMaciej Galiński
Maciej Galiński
MBMarcin Biegun
Marcin Biegun
Spontaneous voltage drop between EDLC electrodes, when it is kept under the open-circuit condition, is commonly called ‘self-discharge’ and is interpreted as a result of energy loss by the device. Three mechanisms of self-discharge were proposed: due to a leakage-current, faradaic reactions and charge redistribution. According to the law of energy preservation, if the voltage drop is associated with the energy loss, the energy would more likely be exchanged with the environment. While heat generation was measured during EDLC charging and discharging, the corresponding effect during storage under open-circuit conditions has not been reported. This may support the conclusion that voltage changes during ‘self-discharge’ are not related to a considerable energy loss. Moreover, it has been shown that a two-stage charging process, i.e. first galvanostatic charging followed by a potentiostatic charge redistribution, resulted in considerably slower potential changes when the device was switched to the open circuit. All discussed models were based on the assumption that the energy accumulated by EDLCs is proportional to the voltage in the second power, with capacitance (C/2) as the proportionality constant. However, it has been shown that during EDLC charging or discharging through a resistance R, equations valid for ‘dielectric’ and electrolytic capacitors, do not hold in the case of EDLCs. Consequently, the assumption that the energetic state of the EDLC is proportional at any time to the voltage in the second power may not be valid due to considerable variability of the ‘constant’ C. Therefore, voltage changes may not reflect the energetic state of the device.

1 November 2018 in Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MFMonika Figiela
Monika Figiela
Marcin WysokowskiMarcin Wysokowski
Marcin Wysokowski
MGMaciej Galiński
Maciej Galiński
Teofil JesionowskiTeofil Jesionowski
Teofil Jesionowski
ISIzabela Stępniak
Izabela Stępniak