Due to the worldwide water crisis and diminishing water supplies, it is imperative to reduce water use and reuse it. One possible source of water is the washings created during the purification of drinking water. Backwashing constitutes 2–8% of the treated water used globally; it is more commonly used, primarily for irrigation or to expand surface/groundwater resources. Therefore, recirculating it at the beginning of the water treatment system is reasonable and justifiable, as it can lead to a decrease in the cost of the water that is being used. A study of variations in the content of washings in two water treatment plants revealed the requirement for pollutants to be removed before the water is reused. For the safety of consumers, the presence of microbes in backwashings from both facilities was essential. Variability in the amount and composition of backwashings was higher for surface water treatment in comparison to infiltration water treatment; however, the amount of backwashings was greater in infiltration water. The quantity of microorganisms, including indicator ones, was substantially higher in washings following surface water treatment. On the other hand, in the washings from the infiltration water treatment, large amounts of iron and manganese compounds were present, the recycling of which would reduce the effectiveness of infiltration water treatment. Pre-treatment backwashings from both facilities will be suitable for the suspension separation procedures and disinfection. It is essential to compare the costs connected with water use against the anticipated cost of washing. The potential to purify additional water in the event of a worsening water shortage, however, is the most significant advantage of water reuse. Recycling of the washings will allow to reduce the fees for the use of the environment, even to EUR 150,000 and EUR 250,000 per year for surface and infiltration WTP, respectively.
14 February 2014 in Desalination and Water Treatment
This paper discusses the impact of coagulation, ozonation and adsorption on the activated carbon, the content of precursors of chlorinated organic compounds. Coagulation guaranteed the effective elimination of non-biodegradable organic substances and essentially did not impact the biodegradable dissolvent organic carbon (DOC) concentrations. The coagulation process brought about a decrease in concentration for all analysed fractions of organic substances. The removal efficiency of organic substances was higher for mixed water than surface water (SW). Conversely ozonation lowered the biological stability of water by increasing the biodegradable DOC concentration, while only marginally causing the mineralisation of refractive substances. The non-biodegradable organic substances’ mineralisation level for the water samples was between 0.00–1.35 g C/m3 (for SW) and 0.02–0.46 g C/m3 (for infiltration water). In general, a higher mineralisation level was registered for SW. Adsorption, despite its substantial removal effectiveness, did not cause the total elimination of high-molecular weight organic substances. In general, total and dissolved organic carbon was more effectively eliminated from SW, probably due to higher pre-adsorption concentration levels in SW. All analysed processes decrease the potential to create chlorinated organic substances through a disinfection process.
Geosmin and 2-methylisoborneol (MIB) are the most common causes of unpleasant odours in drinking water. A method was proposed to detect and recognise these compounds in water and determine their concentrations. The method utilises commercial solid-state gas sensors and data analysis. Sample preparation plays an important role. The aqueous solution is converted into a gas sample using a specially designed dynamic headspace. The responses of the sensors are recorded during exposure to headspace vapours in a dynamic mode. The best limit of detection for geosmin, LOD = 6.20 µg/L, was attained with a TGS2602 sensor. The best limit of detection for MIB, LOD = 0.52 µg/L, was attained with a TGS826 sensor. Geosmin and MIB recognition was 100% successful based on TGS826 and TGS2602 response classifications. Geosmin and MIB concentrations were effectively determined in solutions containing one or both compounds. The respective mathematical models utilised the responses of TGS826 and TGS2602. The smallest concentration prediction error was RMSE = 2.19 µg/L (for geosmin) and RMSE = 0.33 µg/L (for MIB). The study demonstrated the application potential of non-specific gas sensors for the early warning monitoring of geosmin and MIB presence in water. Further studies are needed to develop a system that can be tested in field conditions.
This study concerns the utility of the coagulation process in removing humic substances and its dependence on the properties of these substances and their concentrations. The coagulation process was performed on model solutions of natural humic acids. Polyaluminum chloride (PAX XL3) and aluminum sulfate were used for this study, which allowed for a comparison of the effectiveness of pre-hydrolyzed and hydrolyzing coagulants. The coagulant dosages were determined as gram aluminum per gram carbon, thanks to which it was possible to compare the process effectiveness for different initial organic carbon concentrations, whose values were in the range of 5.51–21.23 gC/m3. The obtained values of reductions in organic carbon concentrations point to a significant process effectiveness (37.2–59.4% and 20.0–41.5% for pre-hydrolyzed and hydrolyzing coagulants, respectively), which increased with increasing molecular mass of the humic substances present in water. These results are analogous to those found for coagulation of surface waters and point to a greater effectiveness of pre-hydrolyzed coagulant in removing humic substances (at the same coagulant dosage). The effectiveness in removing organic substances increased with coagulant dosage and the initial total organic carbon concentration. The coagulation process most effectively removed aromatic substances absorbing UV light. The content of substances absorbing UV light in raw and post-coagulation water was proportional to the dissolved organic carbon content.
1 January 2015 in Environment Protection Engineering