Yuan-Chiao Lu

Dr. Yuan-Chiao Lu

Children's National Hospital
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

9Years (2018-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
YLYuan-Chiao Lu
Yuan-Chiao Lu
RWRegine Walker
Regine Walker
PRPatrick Richard
Patrick Richard
Mustafa Z. YounisMustafa Z. Younis
Mustafa Z. Younis
Background: The American family structure has changed in the past few decades due to a rise in the divorce rate and unmarried women with children. Research suggests a salary disparity between men and women, especially for those women after pregnancy. However, these studies were confined to individuals within traditional families, and there is a lack of information of income disparity and poverty status between single mothers and fathers. The current study explored the disparities in single-parent families based on the household income and the poverty status using a set of nationwide censor data. Methods: The current study used data from the 2011 and 2013 Panel Study of Income Dynamics (N = 1135). Multivariate regression models were used in the analysis. Results: The demographic characteristics of the weighted population showed that taxable income, total income, and poverty status were higher for single fathers than mothers, while non-work income was higher for single mothers than fathers. Single mothers were much more likely to be at the crisis category than single fathers. Multivariate analyses showed that gender, age, marital status, years of experience, and geographic region had effects on taxable income, and only gender, marital status, and region had effects on poverty status. Conclusions: The results suggest that vulnerable group of single mothers was acknowledged according to income and poverty status. Age, marital status, years of experience, and region would be the critical factors for predicting the income and poverty status for single parenthood.

26 May 2022 in Communications Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
YLYuan-Chiao Lu
Yuan-Chiao Lu
NANickie Andescavage
Nickie Andescavage
YWYao Wu
Yao Wu
KKKushal Kapse
Kushal Kapse
NANicole R. Andersen
Nicole R. Andersen
CLCatherine Limperopoulos
Catherine Limperopoulos
Background: Elevated maternal psychological distress during pregnancy is linked to adverse outcomes in offspring. The potential effects of intensified levels of maternal distress during the COVID-19 pandemic on the developing fetal brain are currently unknown. Methods: We prospectively enrolled 202 pregnant women: 65 without known COVID-19 exposures during the pandemic who underwent 92 fetal MRI scans, and 137 pre-pandemic controls who had 182 MRI scans. Multi-plane, multi-phase single shot fast spin echo T2-weighted images were acquired on a GE 1.5 T MRI Scanner. Volumes of six brain tissue types were calculated. Cortical folding measures, including brain surface area, local gyrification index, and sulcal depth were determined. At each MRI scan, maternal distress was assessed using validated stress, anxiety, and depression scales. Generalized estimating equations were utilized to compare maternal distress measures, brain volume and cortical folding differences between pandemic and pre-pandemic cohorts. Results: Stress and depression scores are significantly higher in the pandemic cohort, compared to the pre-pandemic cohort. Fetal white matter, hippocampal, and cerebellar volumes are decreased in the pandemic cohort. Cortical surface area and local gyrification index are also decreased in all four lobes, while sulcal depth is lower in the frontal, parietal, and occipital lobes in the pandemic cohort, indicating delayed brain gyrification. Conclusions: We report impaired fetal brain growth and delayed cerebral cortical gyrification in COVID-19 pandemic era pregnancies, in the setting of heightened maternal psychological distress. The potential long-term neurodevelopmental consequences of altered fetal brain development in COVID-era pregnancies merit further study.

8 October 2018 in IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
AGArnold David Gomez
Arnold David Gomez
AKAndrew K. Knutsen
Andrew K. Knutsen
FXFangxu Xing
Fangxu Xing
YLYuan-Chiao Lu
Yuan-Chiao Lu
DCDeva Chan
Deva Chan
JPJerry L Prince
Jerry L Prince
Objective: To obtain dense spatiotemporal measurements of brain deformation from two distinct but complementary head motion experiments: linear and rotational accelerations. Methods: This study introduces a strategy for integrating harmonic phase analysis of tagged magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and finite element models to extract mechanically representative deformation measurements. The method was calibrated using simulated as well as experimental data, demonstrated in a phantom including data with image artifacts, and used to measure brain deformation in human volunteers undergoing rotational and linear acceleration. Results: Evaluation methods yielded a displacement error of 1.1 mm compared to human observers, and strain errors between 0.1 $\pm$ 0.2% (mean $\pm$ std. dev.) for linear acceleration and 0.7 $\pm$ 0.3% for rotational acceleration. In the presence of inconsistent or missing data, we demonstrate an approach that can provide an error reduction of 86%. Analysis of results shows consistency with 2D motion estimation, agreement with external sensors, and the expected physical behavior of the brain. Conclusion: Mechanical regularization is useful for obtaining dense spatiotemporal measurements of in-vivo brain deformation under different loading regimes. Significance: The measurements suggest that the brain's 3D response to mild accelerations includes distinct patterns observable using practical MRI resolutions. This type of measurement can provide validation data for computer models for the study of traumatic brain injury (TBI).

1 September 2021 in Placenta
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
NANickie Andescavage
Nickie Andescavage
KKKushal Kapse
Kushal Kapse
YLYuan-Chiao Lu
Yuan-Chiao Lu
SBScott D. Barnett
Scott D. Barnett
MJMarni Jacobs
Marni Jacobs
CLCatherine Limperopoulos
Catherine Limperopoulos

14 July 2025 in Imaging Neuroscience
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
YLYuan-Chiao Lu
Yuan-Chiao Lu
LZLianrui Zuo
Lianrui Zuo
YCYi-Yu Chou
Yi-Yu Chou
BDBlake E. Dewey
Blake E. Dewey
SRSamuel Remedios
Samuel Remedios
DPDzung L. Pham
Dzung L. Pham
Volumetric analysis of magnetic resonance brain images is often complicated by variations in scanner hardware, software, and acquisition settings. Over the past several years, there has been an increase in the use of retrospective harmonization techniques for addressing these variations. This research evaluates three image harmonization methods—neuroCombat (a statistical batch correction tool), DeepHarmony (a supervised deep learning method based on image-to-image translation), and HACA3 (an unsupervised deep learning image translation approach). The study focuses on their effectiveness in achieving consistent brain volume measurements across differing T1-weighted acquisitions (GRE and MPRAGE) and their ability to detect simulated atrophy changes in the same acquisitions. While all three methods notably enhance the consistency of regional brain volumes compared with unharmonized images, HACA3 demonstrated the lowest measurement variation in terms of absolute volume difference percentage (AVDP) across all brain regions (0.9). In the atrophy simulation experiments, HACA3 consistently achieved the smallest AVDPs across most unchanged brain regions, while DeepHarmony showed significant improvements in several regions, and neuroCombat exhibited higher variability. Additionally, using neuroCombat with training data effectively detected hippocampal atrophy, whereas without training, neuroCombat could not differentiate between images with and without atrophy, highlighting a potential limitation in its ability to detect subtle brain volume changes when training data are unavailable. In most metrics, HACA3 was found to be the most effective for harmonizing MRI data, followed by DeepHarmony, with neuroCombat showing more measurement variability but still offering improvements over unharmonized data.

25 October 2025 in Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
AAAhmed A. Alshareef
Ahmed A. Alshareef
JGJ. Sebastian Giudice
J. Sebastian Giudice
DSDaniel F. Shedd
Daniel F. Shedd
YLYuan-Chiao Lu
Yuan-Chiao Lu
CJCurtis L Johnson
Curtis L Johnson
MPMatthew B. Panzer
Matthew B. Panzer
Rapid head motion causes the brain to deform, which may lead to acute and chronic consequences to normal brain health and function. Since the risk and severity of brain injury correlates with brain strain, computational and physical models of the brain response to impact are commonly used to assess risk and evaluate safety devices in silico. Most physical head surrogates that are used for equipment evaluation, however, are simplified and lack internal measures of brain deformation, relying instead on the interpretation of the resulting head kinematics to predict injury. Developing a more biofidelic physical brain surrogate to improve brain injury risk assessments requires the use of experimental brain motion data. Two techniques, sonomicrometry and tagged magnetic resonance imaging (tMRI), have been independently developed to characterize the in situ and in vivo brain response. Combining data acquired from both techniques can leverage the advantages of each method while alleviating the limitations. The objectives of this study were to create a head surrogate with realistic intracranial geometry and brain simulant for use in multimodal brain deformation experiments. Six gel simulants were tested using shear rheometry, with Sylgard 527 chosen as the best simulant for this study. The headform was created using the average geometry from an MRI template of 20 healthy volunteers, and was tested under non-injurious loading conditions using tMRI and sonomicrometry. The prototype headform showed good contrast in T1-weighted MRI and captured similar strain patterns when compared to the in vivo human response, although maximum principal strains (MPS) were approximately double what is measured in vivo. The two techniques showed good correspondence in brain motion response with trade-offs in temporal resolution and measurement density. Both techniques also showed similar displacement and strain magnitudes with a finite element simulation of the headform. Future studies will focus on including a more realistic sliding condition between skull and brain, as well as optimizing the material properties to better match the in vivo and in situ data.