David Ranucci

Prof. David Ranucci

University of Perugia, Italy
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

21Years (2006-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
17 July 2020 in Animals
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LMLaura Musa
Laura Musa
PPPatrizia Casagrande Proietti
Patrizia Casagrande Proietti
Raffaella BranciariRaffaella Branciari
Raffaella Branciari
Laura MenchettiLaura Menchetti
Laura Menchetti
SBSara Bellucci
Sara Bellucci
Maria Pia FranciosiniMaria Pia Franciosini
Maria Pia Franciosini
As a result of public health concerns regarding antimicrobial resistance in animal-based food products, conventional poultry companies have turned to ‘raised without antibiotics’ (ABF) and organic farming systems. In this work, we evaluated the influence of rearing systems on antimicrobial susceptibility in E. coli and extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESLB) E. coli diffusion in conventional (C), organic (O) and antibiotic free (ABF) chicken samples collected from cloacal swabs and skin samples in slaughterhouse. The E. coli isolates from conventional (135), antibiotic-free (131) and organic (140) samples were submitted to the Kirby–Bauer method and ESBL E. coli were analyzed by the microdilution test. Conventional samples showed the highest number of strains resistant to ampicillin (89.6%; p < 0.01), cefotaxime (43.7%; p < 0.01), nalidixic acid (57.8%; p < 0.01), ciprofloxacin (44.4%; p < 0.001), and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (62.2%; p < 0.01), with patterns of multi-resistance to three (35.1%) and to four antimicrobials (31.3%), whereas most of the E. coli isolated from antibiotic-free and organic chicken samples revealed a co-resistance pattern (29.2% and 39%, respectively). The highest number of ESBL E. coli was observed in conventional, in both cloacal and skin samples and the lowest in organic (p < 0.001). Our results are consistent with the effect of conventional farming practices on E. coli antimicrobial resistance and ESBL E. coli number, due to the use of antimicrobials and close contact with litter for most of the production cycle.

4 December 2014 in International Journal of Food Science and Technology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Raffaella BranciariRaffaella Branciari
Raffaella Branciari
DRDavid Ranucci
David Ranucci
MTMassimo Trabalza-Marinucci
Massimo Trabalza-Marinucci
MCMichela Codini
Michela Codini
MOMara Orru
Mara Orru
AVAndrea Valiani
Andrea Valiani

1 April 2019 in International Journal of Food Microbiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
RRRossana Roila
Rossana Roila
AVAndrea Valiani
Andrea Valiani
DRDavid Ranucci
David Ranucci
RORoberta Ortenzi
Roberta Ortenzi
MSMaurizio Servili
Maurizio Servili
Raffaella BranciariRaffaella Branciari
Raffaella Branciari

2 July 2021 in Foods
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Rossana RoilaRossana Roila
Rossana Roila
Raffaella BranciariRaffaella Branciari
Raffaella Branciari
EVEmanuela Verdini
Emanuela Verdini
DRDavid Ranucci
David Ranucci
AVAndrea Valiani
Andrea Valiani
Ivan PecorelliIvan Pecorelli
Ivan Pecorelli
Aflatoxin food contamination represents a rising global issue that will continue to increase due to climate change. Aflatoxin M1 (AFM1) is of high concern for the whole dairy industry. In light of AFM1′s harmful potential, a human health exposure assessment and risk characterization were performed for all age populations of central Italy with regard to milk and cheese consumption by means of the margin of exposure (MOE). In total, 16,934 cow and ewe’s milk samples were collected from 2014 to 2020 and analyzed by an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) screening method, confirmed by high-performance liquid chromatography with a fluorescence detector (HPLC-FLD). The average concentration of AFM1 in cow’s milk ranged from 0.009 to 0.015 µg/kg, while in ewe’s milk, the average concentration ranged from 0.009 to 0.013 µg/kg. The average amount of AFM1 exposure ranged from 0.00005 to 0.00195 g/kg bw/day, with the main contributor represented by drinking milk, followed by the consumption of soft cheeses. A high level of public health concern related to the youngest consumers has arisen from risk characterizations highlighting the need for constant monitoring of AFM1′s occurrence in milk by inspection authorities, alongside regular updates with regard to exposure assessments.

16 October 2020 in Foods
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Marta CastricaMarta Castrica
Marta Castrica
Laura MenchettiLaura Menchetti
Laura Menchetti
Claudia Maria BalzarettiClaudia Maria Balzaretti
Claudia Maria Balzaretti
Raffaella BranciariRaffaella Branciari
Raffaella Branciari
DRDavid Ranucci
David Ranucci
Dino MiragliaDino Miraglia
Dino Miraglia
Forty-two New Zealand White rabbits (n = 21/group) were fed with two different diets: a commercial diet (control group) and a diet supplemented with goji berries (3% w/w). After slaughtering, the effect of dietary supplementation on microbiological, physico-chemical, and sensory characteristics of the rabbit loins, packed in an oxygen-permeable package, was evaluated at 6 h post mortem (day 0), after 4 and 10 days of refrigerated storage. No relevant results were obtained for pH and total volatile basic Nitrogen (TVBN) values but with regards to the color, some significant differences were observed between the groups. The goji berries (GBs) dietary supplementation had positive effects by reducing thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS) values in all the observations (p < 0.001). Moreover, microbiological results showed that the supplementation had a significant impact on Lactobacillus spp. (p < 0.001) prevalence, indeed the goji group had higher means on day 0 (p < 0.05) and on day 4 (p < 0.001) than the control group. Lastly, with regards to the consumer’s test, the tasters assigned a higher score to GBs rabbit meatballs and the purchase interest increased when the rabbit diet was known. Overall, these results indicate that the goji berries inclusion in the rabbit diet could represent a valuable strategy to improve quality and sensory traits of meat.

11 October 2019 in Foods
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Rossana RoilaRossana Roila
Rossana Roila
Raffaella BranciariRaffaella Branciari
Raffaella Branciari
Ivan PecorelliIvan Pecorelli
Ivan Pecorelli
ECElisa Cristofani
Elisa Cristofani
CCCristiano Carloni
Cristiano Carloni
LFLaura Fioroni
Laura Fioroni
Occurring central Italy, 262 unmedicated feed samples and 353 samples of animal tissues and eggs are tested for coccidiostats between 2012 and 2017. A validated multi-residue HPLC-MS/MS method is applied for the simultaneous determination of the 11 coccidiostats licensed in the EU. The dietary exposure to coccidiostats through poultry meat and eggs is calculated for high consumers, and the contribution to acceptable daily intake of coccidiostats is evaluated. The occurrence of positive feed samples ranges from 17.2% in 2012 to 28.3% in 2017, with an average percentage of positive samples of 25%, while 3.8% of feed samples are non-compliant with a concentration ranging from 0.015 mg/kg for diclazuril to 56 mg/kg for narasin. Positive samples of animal tissues, on average, are 34.7%, fully compliant, while 16% of eggs are positive and violative residues are found in 2%. These noncompliant samples show a concentration varying from 2.4 µg/kg to 1002 µg/kg. The contribution of poultry meat and egg consumption to the acceptable daily intake of each coccidiostat is below 1%, highlighting a low direct risk to public health.