Daniel Carruth

Dr. Daniel Carruth

Mississippi State University
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

25Years (2002-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 November 2017 in Applied Ergonomics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SDShuchisnigdha Deb
Shuchisnigdha Deb
Daniel CarruthDaniel Carruth
Daniel Carruth
RSRichard Sween
Richard Sween
LSLesley Strawderman
Lesley Strawderman
TGTeena M. Garrison
Teena M. Garrison

1 November 2017 in Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SDShuchisnigdha Deb
Shuchisnigdha Deb
LSLesley Strawderman
Lesley Strawderman
Daniel CarruthDaniel Carruth
Daniel Carruth
JDJanice DuBien
Janice DuBien
BSBrian Smith
Brian Smith
TGTeena M. Garrison
Teena M. Garrison

1 November 2018 in Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SDShuchisnigdha Deb
Shuchisnigdha Deb
LSLesley J. Strawderman
Lesley J. Strawderman
Daniel CarruthDaniel Carruth
Daniel Carruth

15 January 2019 in Electronics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Chris GoodinChris Goodin
Chris Goodin
Daniel CarruthDaniel Carruth
Daniel Carruth
MDMatthew Doude
Matthew Doude
CHChristopher Hudson
Christopher Hudson
While it is well known that rain may influence the performance of automotive LIDAR sensors commonly used in ADAS applications, there is a lack of quantitative analysis of this effect. In particular, there is very little published work on physically-based simulation of the influence of rain on terrestrial LIDAR performance. Additionally, there have been few quantitative studies on how rain-rate influences ADAS performance. In this work, we develop a mathematical model for the performance degradation of LIDAR as a function of rain-rate and incorporate this model into a simulation of an obstacle-detection system to show how it can be used to quantitatively predict the influence of rain on ADAS that use LIDAR.

1 September 2017 in Accident Analysis & Prevention
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SDShuchisnigdha Deb
Shuchisnigdha Deb
LSLesley Strawderman
Lesley Strawderman
JDJanice DuBien
Janice DuBien
BSBrian Smith
Brian Smith
Daniel CarruthDaniel Carruth
Daniel Carruth
TGTeena M. Garrison
Teena M. Garrison

1 October 2017
Verified
Conference Paper
Closed access
Daniel CarruthDaniel Carruth
Daniel Carruth
The advent of inexpensive consumer virtual reality display technology has made new possibilities for delivering education and training in immersive and engaging ways widely available. In the past, technical challenges and prohibitive cost have impeded progress of virtual reality in education. Educational institutions and industries are now moving rapidly to adopt virtual reality as a key training tool. Virtual learning environments have been very successful in generating positive learning outcomes in a variety of domains. The powerful sense of presence and effective immersion created by virtual reality applications promise to provide on-site training in a safe and controlled environment. Virtual learning environments can provide trainees with access to cost-prohibitive equipment in impossible locations. It can provide a space for students to explore problem spaces and test solutions without risk. Despite these successes, questions remain regarding the capabilities and limitations of current technology, particularly regarding the effectiveness of knowledge and skill acquisition in virtual reality. The process for developing effective educational training virtual environments begins with understanding the learning objectives, re-creation of the real-world task(s), and assessing user performance and learning. Each stage of the process presents unique challenges and opportunities.