Kaja Orupõld

Dr. Kaja Orupõld

Estonian University of Life Sciences
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

32Years (1995-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 February 2020 in Waste Management
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
DBDominik Blasenbauer
Dominik Blasenbauer
FHFlorian Huber
Florian Huber
JLJakob Lederer
Jakob Lederer
Margarida QuinaMargarida Quina
Margarida Quina
DBDenise Blanc-Biscarat
Denise Blanc-Biscarat
JFJohann Fellner
Johann Fellner
Almost 500 municipal solid waste incineration plants in the EU, Norway and Switzerland generate about 17.6 Mt/a of incinerator bottom ash (IBA). IBA contains minerals and metals. Metals are mostly separated and sold to the scrap market and minerals are either disposed of in landfills or utilised in the construction sector. Since there is no uniform regulation for IBA utilisation at EU level, countries developed own rules with varying requirements for utilisation. As a result from a cooperation network between European experts an up-to-date overview of documents regulating IBA utilisation is presented. Furthermore, this work highlights the different requirements that have to be considered. Overall, 51 different parameters for the total content and 36 different parameters for the emission by leaching are defined. An analysis of the defined parameter reveals that leaching parameters are significantly more to be considered compared to total content parameters. In order to assess the leaching behaviour nine different leaching tests, including batch tests, up-flow percolation tests and one diffusion test (monolithic materials) are in place. A further discussion of leaching parameters showed that certain countries took over limit values initially defined for landfills for inert waste and adopted them for IBA utilisation. The overall utilisation rate of IBA in construction works is approximately 54 wt%. It is revealed that the rate of utilisation does not necessarily depend on how well regulated IBA utilisation is, but rather seems to be a result of political commitment for IBA recycling and economically interesting circumstances.

1 May 2011 in Journal of Hazardous Materials
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Mario Luna-delRiscoMario Luna-delRisco
Mario Luna-delRisco
Kaja OrupõldKaja Orupõld
Kaja Orupõld
HDHenri-Charles Dubourguier
Henri-Charles Dubourguier

1 January 2017 in Urban Forestry & Urban Greening
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MRMerlin Raud
Merlin Raud
MMM. Mitt
M. Mitt
TOT. Oja
T. Oja
JOJ. Olt
J. Olt
Kaja OrupõldKaja Orupõld
Kaja Orupõld
Timo KikasTimo Kikas
Timo Kikas

9 January 2016 in Waste and Biomass Valorization
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Juris BurlakovsJuris Burlakovs
Juris Burlakovs
FKFabio Kaczala
Fabio Kaczala
ZVZane Vincevica-Gaile
Zane Vincevica-Gaile
VRVita Rudovica
Vita Rudovica
Kaja OrupõldKaja Orupõld
Kaja Orupõld
WHWilliam Hogland
William Hogland

1 September 2018 in Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MVMeeri Visnapuu
Meeri Visnapuu
MRMerilin Rosenberg
Merilin Rosenberg
ETEgle Truska
Egle Truska
ENErgo Nõmmiste
Ergo Nõmmiste
AŠAndris Šutka
Andris Šutka
Angela IvaskAngela Ivask
Angela Ivask

1 August 2020 in Industrial Crops and Products
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Lisandra Rocha-MenesesLisandra Rocha-Meneses
Lisandra Rocha-Meneses
Jorge FerreiraJorge Ferreira
Jorge Ferreira
MMMaryam Mushtaq
Maryam Mushtaq
SKSajjad Karimi
Sajjad Karimi
Kaja OrupõldKaja Orupõld
Kaja Orupõld
Timo KikasTimo Kikas
Timo Kikas