Hanping Shi

Prof. Hanping Shi

首都医科大学北京石济潭医院
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

9Years (2018-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
22 February 2022 in Clinical Nutrition
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Lorenzo Maria DoniniLorenzo Maria Donini
Lorenzo Maria Donini
Luca BusettoLuca Busetto
Luca Busetto
SBStephan C. Bischoff
Stephan C. Bischoff
TCTommy Cederholm
Tommy Cederholm
MBMaria D. Ballesteros-Pomar
Maria D. Ballesteros-Pomar
RBRocco Barazzoni
Rocco Barazzoni

20 June 2022 in Frontiers in Endocrinology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
GRGuo-Tian Ruan
Guo-Tian Ruan
HXHai-Lun Xie
Hai-Lun Xie
HZHe-Yang Zhang
He-Yang Zhang
CLChen-An Liu
Chen-An Liu
YGYi-Zhong Ge
Yi-Zhong Ge
Hanping ShiHanping Shi
Hanping Shi
Background: Systemic inflammation and insulin resistance (IR) are closely related in patients with cancer. However, there is no relevant indicator that combines inflammation and IR to predict patient prognosis. Therefore, this study aimed to develop and validate a novel inflammation- and IR-related marker in patients with cancer.Methods: The total cohort of this study included 5221 patients with cancer, and the training and validation cohorts were randomized in a 7:3 ratio. C-reactive protein (CRP) and fasting triglyceride glucose (TyG) were used to reflect patients’ inflammation and IR status, respectively. The CRP-TyG index (CTI) was composed of CRP and TyG. The concordance (C)-index, receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve, and calibration curve reflected the prognostic predictive power of CTI. Univariate and multivariate survival analyses predicted the prognostic value of CTI in patients with cancer.Results: The C-indices of CTI in patients with cancer were 0.636, 0.617, and 0.631 in the total, training, and validation cohorts, respectively. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year ROC and calibration curves showed that CTI had a good predictive ability of survival in patients with cancer. Meanwhile, patients with high CTI had a worse prognosis compared to patients with low CTI (total cohort: hazard ratio [HR] = 1.46, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] = 1.33–1.59; training cohort: HR = 1.36, 95% CI = 1.22–1.52; validation cohort: HR = 1.73, 95% CI = 1.47–2.04].Conclusion: The CTI is a useful prognostic indicator of poor prognosis and a promising tool for treatment strategy decision-making in patients with cancer.

30 March 2023 in Frontiers in Immunology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
MYMing Yang
Ming Yang
SLShi-Qi Lin
Shi-Qi Lin
XLXiao-Yue Liu
Xiao-Yue Liu
MTMeng Tang
Meng Tang
CHChun-Lei Hu
Chun-Lei Hu
Hanping ShiHanping Shi
Hanping Shi
Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is among the most common malignant cancers worldwide, and its development is influenced by inflammation, nutrition, and the immune status. Therefore, we combined C-reactive protein (CRP), albumin, and lymphocyte, which could reflect above status, to be the CRP-albumin-lymphocyte (CALLY) index, and evaluated its association with overall survival (OS) in patients with CRC.Methods: The clinicopathological and laboratory characteristics of 1260 patients with CRC were collected from the Investigation on Nutrition Status and Clinical Outcome of Common Cancers (INSCOC) study. Cox regression analysis was performed to assess the association between the CALLY index and OS. A nomogram including sex, age, the CALLY index and TNM stage was constructed. The Concordance Index (C-index) was utilized to evaluate the prognostic value of the CALLY index and classical CRC prognostic factors, such as modified Glasgow prognostic score (mGPS), neutrocyte to lymphocyte ratio (NLR), systemic immune inflammation index (SII), and platelet to lymphocyte ratio (PLR), as well as to assess the prognostic value of the nomogram and TNM stage.Results: Multivariate Cox regression analyses demonstrated that the CALLY index was independently associated with OS in patients with CRC [Hazard ratio (HR) = 0.91, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.87-0.95, P<0.001]. The CALLY index showed the highest prognostic value (C-index = 0.666, 95% CI = 0.638-0.694, P<0.001), followed by mGPS, NLR, SII, and PLR. The nomogram demonstrated higher prognostic value (C-index = 0.784, 95% CI = 0.762-0.807, P<0.001) than the TNM stage.Conclusion: The CALLY index was independently associated with OS in patients with CRC and showed higher prognostic value than classical CRC prognostic factors. The nomogram could provide more accurate prognostic prediction than TNM stage.

22 April 2022 in Clinical Nutrition
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
HXHailun Xie
Hailun Xie
GRGuotian Ruan
Guotian Ruan
YGYizhong Ge
Yizhong Ge
QZQi Zhang
Qi Zhang
HZHeyang Zhang
Heyang Zhang
Hanping ShiHanping Shi
Hanping Shi

14 July 2022 in Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
MSMengmeng Song
Mengmeng Song
QZQi Zhang
Qi Zhang
CSChunhua Song
Chunhua Song
TLTong Liu
Tong Liu
XZXi Zhang
Xi Zhang
Hanping ShiHanping Shi
Hanping Shi
Backgrounds: Malnutrition and systemic inflammatory responses are associated with poor overall survival (OS) in lung cancer patients, but it remains unclear which biomarkers are better for predicting their prognosis. This study tried to determine the best one among the existing common nutrition/inflammation‐based indicators of OS for patients with lung cancer.Materials and methods: There were 16 nutrition or systemic inflammation‐based indicators included in this study. The cut‐off points for the indicators were calculated using maximally selected rank statistics. The OS was evaluated using the Kaplan–Meier estimator, and univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazard models were used to determine the relationship between the indicators and OS. A time‐dependent receiver operating characteristic curves (time‐ROC) and C‐index were calculated to assess the predictive ability of the different indicators.Results: There were 1772 patients with lung cancer included in this study. In univariate analysis, all 16 indicators were significantly associated with OS of the patients (all P < 0.001). Except for platelet‐to‐lymphocyte ratio, all other indicators were independent predictors of OS in multivariate analysis (all P < 0.05). Low advanced lung cancer inflammation index (ALI) was associated with higher mortality risk of lung cancer [hazard ratio, 1.30; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.13–1.49]. The results of the time‐AUC and C‐index analyses indicated that the ALI (C‐index: 0.611) had the best predictive ability on the OS in patients with lung cancer. In different sub‐groups, the ALI was the best indicator for predicting the OS of lung cancer patients regardless of sex (C‐index, 0.609 for men and 0.613 for women) or smoking status (C‐index, 0.629 for non‐smoker and 0.601 for smoker) and in patients aged <65 years (C‐index, 0.613). However, the modified Glasgow prognostic score was superior to the other indicators in non‐small cell lung cancer patients (C‐index, 0.639) or patients aged ≥65 years (C‐index, 0.610), and the glucose‐to‐lymphocyte ratio performed better prognostic ability in patients with small cell lung cancer (C‐index, 0.601).Conclusions: The prognostic ability of the ALI is superior to the other inflammation/nutrition‐based indicators for all patients with lung cancer.

1 March 2021 in Clinical Nutrition
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
XZXi Zhang
Xi Zhang
MTMeng Tang
Meng Tang
QZQi Zhang
Qi Zhang
KZKang-Ping Zhang
Kang-Ping Zhang
ZGZeng-Qing Guo
Zeng-Qing Guo
Hanping ShiHanping Shi
Hanping Shi