Aim: The aim was to systematically evaluate the effect of low insertion torque values on the survival rate of immediately loaded dental implants.Materials and Methods: The protocol was registered with PROSPERO (ID CRD42020189499). An electronic search was performed in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials until June 2022 in English and Spanish. Studies analysing the failure or survival rate of immediately loaded dental implants according to different insertion torque values were included.Results: Five‐hundred seventy‐three articles were assessed for eligibility, of which seven articles, four randomized clinical trials (RCTs), one controlled clinical trial, and two prospective case series studies were included in the qualitative analysis. The RCTs were classified as having low risk of bias and the non‐RCTs as having moderate and serious risk of bias. The mean survival rate for implants with low insertion toque (≤35 Ncm) was 96% (p > .001, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.91–0.98) and that for implants with medium or high insertion torque (>35 Ncm) was 92% (p > .001, 95% CI: 0.86–0.96) (incidence rate ratio [IRR] = 1.05, 95% CI: 0.79–1.39, p = .175, I² = 0.0%). Splinted implants with insertion torque >20 Ncm and single implants with insertion torque >35 Ncm had a higher survival rate than implants with lower insertion torque values (IRR = 1.05, 95% CI: 0.78–1.43, p = .956, I² = 0.0%, and RR = 0.92, 95% CI: 0.48–1.75, p = .799, I² = 0.0%, respectively). Different insertion torque values achieved equivalent outcomes. The mean follow‐up was 24 months.Conclusions: Low insertion torque values have no significant effect on survival rates of immediate loading implants at a mean follow‐up of 24 months.

Background: In mucogingival and implant surgery, an autologous soft tissue graft from the palate is the gold standard for reconstructing missing keratinised soft tissue and volume. Previously, presurgical measurements of the graft harvesting site were described with two-dimensional (2D) linear measurements. The present observational clinical study aimed to evaluate a three-dimensional (3D) measurement method for determining the present palatal soft tissue volume for each patient individually. Methods: Pre-existing cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans of 20 patients were converted into 3D Standard Tessellation Language models of the bone surface. Intraoral impressions of the maxilla were taken and digitised to visualise the gingival surface. The resulting virtual models of bone (reference value) and gingival (actual value) surfaces were merged, with tooth surfaces used for registration. The region between the central incisors and the hard palate was subdivided into 5 regions of interest (ROIs). The distance between palatal bone and gingival surface was analysed both volumetrically and linearly, and the results were statistically evaluated for the ROIs. Results: The average gingival surface area on the palate was 19.1 cm², and the mean volume was 58.2 cm³ (± 16.89). Among the ROIs, the mean linear value was highest in the most distal region, from the second molar to the hard palate (4.0 ± 1.09 mm) and lowest in the canine region (1.9 ± 0.63 mm). For mean distance, significant differences were found for the anterior palate and the most posterior palate in comparison with all other ROIs (p < 0.01). The volume measurements also declined significantly and steadily between the posterior (1.9 ± 1.0 cm³) and anterior palates (0.4 ± 0.2 cm³). Conclusions: By merging digital data, palatal soft tissue could be quantified virtually. The results were reliable and comparable to previous findings with linear measurement methods. This 3D soft tissue volume analysis method fully exploited the diagnostic potential of data that are frequently collected for presurgical planning in oral surgery (i.e., CBCT + surface scans). This evaluation method might be useful for volumetric and linear measurements in other applications in anatomy and for determining palatal soft tissue dimensions in the planning stage before surgical interventions. Trial registration: This observational clinical trial was retrospectively registered in the German Clinical Trials Register, reference number: DRKS00023918.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: In this retrospective study, we aimed to investigate a new 3D evaluation method for evaluating bone regeneration after cystectomy of odontogenic cysts. METHODS: The study included 26 patients who underwent cystectomies between 2012 and 2017 and had received either fillings or non-fillings with autologous iliac crest. Bony regeneration was analyzed using 3D imaging software and comparing identical regions of interest (ROIs) that were determined by exact overlays of the postoperative cone beam computer tomography (CBCT) or computer tomography (CT) images. Outcome measures, including volume changes according to the defect size and configuration, patient age, the entity and distribution of the cysts, were collected. RESULTS: Twenty-six patients (5 women and 21 men) had 30 defects, including nine keratocysts, seven radicular cysts and 14 dentigerous cysts. A total of 73% of the defects were in the mandible. The mean 3D follow-up time was 12 months. According to the 3D evaluation of bony regeneration, the defect size and configuration showed no significant differences between the groups (filled or non-filled with 15 defects per group). CONCLUSIONS: By establishing a standardized 3D method for evaluating bone regeneration, healing can be better monitored and evaluated.

Aim: This retrospective cohort study aimed to volumetrically investigate the bone stability rate of prefabricated allogeneic bone blocks (PBB) and computer‐aided design (CAD)/computer‐aided manufacturing (CAM) custom‐milled allogeneic bone blocks (CCBB) for ridge augmentation.Materials and Methods: Nineteen patients were treated with 20 allografts: 11 CCBB, 9 PBB; 10 in the maxilla and 10 in the mandible. Clinical treatment history and cone beam computed tomography scans before surgery (t₀), directly after graft surgery (t₁) and after 6 months of healing prior to implant insertion (t₂) were evaluated using a three‐dimensional evaluation software for absolute bone volume, stability as well as vertical and horizontal bone gain. Furthermore, the inserted implants were analysed for survival, marginal bone loss (MBL) and complications for a mean follow‐up period of 43.75 (±33.94) months.Results: A mean absolute volume of 2228.1 mm³ (±1205) was grafted at t₁. The bone stability rate was 87.6% (±9.9) for CCBB and 83.0% (±14.5) for PBB. The stability was higher in the maxilla (91.6%) than in the mandible (79.53%). Surgery time of PBB was longer than for CCBB (mean Δ = 52 min). The survival rate of the inserted implants was 100% with a mean MBL of 0.41 mm (±0.37).Conclusion: The clinical performance of both allograft block designs was equally satisfactory for vertical and horizontal bone grafting prior to implant placement.Clinical Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT06027710.