Claude El-Bayeh

Dr. Claude El-Bayeh

Concordia University
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

11Years (2016-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
29 April 2023 in Algorithms
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
APAshok Kumar P
Ashok Kumar P
Claude El-BayehClaude El-Bayeh
Claude El-Bayeh
RDRobertas Damaševičius
Robertas Damaševičius
Machine-learning-based text classification is one of the leading research areas and has a wide range of applications, which include spam detection, hate speech identification, reviews, rating summarization, sentiment analysis, and topic modelling. Widely used machine-learning-based research differs in terms of the datasets, training methods, performance evaluation, and comparison methods used. In this paper, we surveyed 224 papers published between 2003 and 2022 that employed machine learning for text classification. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews (PRISMA) statement is used as the guidelines for the systematic review process. The comprehensive differences in the literature are analyzed in terms of six aspects: datasets, machine learning models, best accuracy, performance evaluation metrics, training and testing splitting methods, and comparisons among machine learning models. Furthermore, we highlight the limitations and research gaps in the literature. Although the research works included in the survey perform well in terms of text classification, improvement is required in many areas. We believe that this survey paper will be useful for researchers in the field of text classification.

18 April 2022 in IEEE Access
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Naoui MohamedNaoui Mohamed
Naoui Mohamed
Aymen FlahAymen Flah
Aymen Flah
TATurki Essa Alharbi
Turki Essa Alharbi
Claude El-BayehClaude El-Bayeh
Claude El-Bayeh
SLSbita Lassaad
Sbita Lassaad
UEUrsula Eicker
Ursula Eicker
In the coming years, major transportation sectors will be electrified, in which more accessible and easy solutions for charging Electric Vehicles (EVs) become vital. Wireless charging is considered one of the best and easiest methods to charge EVs anywhere, even during the driving of cars. To get accurate charging power rates while charging wirelessly, advanced mathematical models are needed to accurately present the charging power. Such models must take into consideration all the coils parameters, shapes, the used compensation topology, and if the system is static or dynamic. This paper presents a comprehensive analysis of the wireless charging systems adapted for EVs by stating the most common charging topologies, and architectures, and by concentrating on the corresponding mathematical models used to calculate the given electrical power as a function of the EV’s situation on streets and its speed. Then, it is possible to evaluate the EV autonomy, and an accurate approximation can be determined when EV is on a wireless charging road. Even with the citation and comparison between the two studied models, this paper opens some perspectives for energy transmitter tools and tries to explain how renewable energy can help the deployment of this technology.

11 January 2021 in World Electric Vehicle Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Claude El-BayehClaude El-Bayeh
Claude El-Bayeh
KAKhaled ALZA'AREER
Khaled ALZA'AREER
AAAl-Motasem Aldaoudeyeh
Al-Motasem Aldaoudeyeh
Brahim BrahmiBrahim Brahmi
Brahim Brahmi
Mohamed ZellaguiMohamed Zellagui
Mohamed Zellagui
The literature covering Plug-in Electric Vehicles (EVs) contains many charging/discharging strategies. However, none of the review papers covers such strategies in a complete fashion where all patterns of EVs charging/discharging are identified. Filling a gap in the literature, we clearly and systematically classify such strategies. After providing a clear definition for each strategy, we provide a detailed comparison between them by categorizing differences as follows: complexity; economics and power losses on the grid side; ability to provide ancillary services for integrity of the power grid; operation aspects (e.g., charging timing); and detrimental impact on the EV, the power grid, or the environment. Each one of these comparison categories is subdivided into even more detailed aspects. After we compare the EV charging/discharging strategies, we further provide recommendations on which strategies are suitable for which applications. Then, we provide ratings for each strategy by weighting all aspects of comparison together. Our review helps authors or aggregators explore likely choices that might suit the specific needs of their systems or test beds.

6 May 2021 in IEEE Access
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Sadam HussainSadam Hussain
Sadam Hussain
Claude El-BayehClaude El-Bayeh
Claude El-Bayeh
CLChunyan Lai
Chunyan Lai
UEUrsula Eicker
Ursula Eicker
Home Energy Management Systems (HEMSs) may not be able to solve network issues, especially in the presence of high penetration level of Electric Vehicles (EVs) and decentral renewable energy. To solve the problem, Grid Energy Management Systems (GEMSs) were introduced. However, because of the contradictory nature of the main objectives of HEMS which are economical oriented on end-users, e.g., cost minimization, and GEMS which are technical oriented on system operators, e.g., maximization of system stability and power quality cannot be satisfied simultaneously. Hence, a multi-level energy management system seems to be necessary to improve the techno-economic performance of the distribution system while satisfying end-users, electricity retailers, and the system operator. Because of the significance of the subject, this paper presents the state-of-the-art regarding different energy management systems at home, aggregator, and network levels. The advantages and disadvantages of each system are discussed and compared, considering their main elements such as objective functions, constraints, optimization algorithms, communication protocols, and impact of EVs. The challenges and limitations in hierarchical energy management are explained. Finally, some future research directions are suggested to improve the multi-level energy management system.

17 May 2022 in Sustainability
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Ayman Al-QuraanAyman Al-Quraan
Ayman Al-Quraan
MAMOHAMMED AL-MAHMODI
MOHAMMED AL-MAHMODI
KAKhaled Alzaareer
Khaled Alzaareer
Claude El-BayehClaude El-Bayeh
Claude El-Bayeh
Ursula EickerUrsula Eicker
Ursula Eicker
In mounted photovoltaic (PV) facilities, energy output losses due to inter-row shading are unavoidable. In order to limit the shadow cast by one module row on another, sufficient inter-row space must be planned. However, it is not uncommon to see PV plants with such close row spacing that energy losses occur owing to row-to-row shading effects. Low module prices and high ground costs lead to such configurations, so the maximum energy output per available surface area is prioritized over optimum energy production per peak power. For any applications where the plant power output needs to be calculated, an exact analysis of the influence of inter-row shading on power generation is required. In this paper, an effective methodology is proposed and discussed in detail, ultimately, to enable PV system designers to identify the optimal inter-row spacing between arrays by generating a multiplier factor. The spacing multiplier factor is mathematically formulated and is generated to be a general formula for any geographical location including flat and non-flat terrains. The developed model is implemented using two case studies with two different terrains, to provide a wider context. The first one is in the Kingdome of Saudi Arabia (KSA) provinces, giving a flat terrain case study; the inter-row spacing multiplier factor is estimated for the direct use of a systems designer. The second one is the water pump for agricultural watering using renewable energy sources, giving a non-flat terrain case study in Dhamar, Al-Hada, Yemen. In this case study, the optimal inter-row spacing factor is estimated for limited-area applications. Therefore, the effective area using the proposed formula is minimized so that the shading of PV arrays on each other is avoided, with a simple design using the spacing factor methodology.